TSTP Solution File: KRS256+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : KRS256+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : richmond.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU          6600  @ 2.40GHz @ 2400MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jun 15 10:56:43 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 0.34s
% Output   : Solution 0.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19004/KRS256+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19004/KRS256+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19004/KRS256+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.5/eproof_ram --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-format /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 19102
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.01 WC
% # Auto-Ordering is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHNFNFFMM21LS
% # Auto-mode selected ordering type KBO6
% # Auto-mode selected ordering precedence scheme <invfreq>
% # Auto-mode selected weight ordering scheme <invfreqrank>
% #
% # Auto-Heuristic is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHNFNFFMM21LS
% # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S
% # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% #
% # No equality, disabling AC handling.
% #
% # Initializing proof state
% # Proof found!
% # SZS status Theorem
% # Parsed axioms                      : 33
% # Removed by relevancy pruning       : 0
% # Initial clauses                    : 109
% # Removed in clause preprocessing    : 0
% # Initial clauses in saturation      : 109
% # Processed clauses                  : 277
% # ...of these trivial                : 37
% # ...subsumed                        : 7
% # ...remaining for further processing: 233
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 1282
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 909
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 1282
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 233
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 49
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 6
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 178
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 741
% # ...number of literals in the above : 1870
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5438
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4102
% # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions: 5
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 276
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # BW rewrite match attempts          : 74
% # BW rewrite match successes         : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index :  1395 nodes,   224 leaves,   1.51+/-3.294 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index      :   334 nodes,    60 leaves,   1.13+/-0.499 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index      :   778 nodes,   124 leaves,   1.07+/-0.363 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-neg-atom index  :   322 nodes,    55 leaves,   1.76+/-4.710 terms/leaf
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&status(X3,X4,X2))<=>mighta(X1,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', mighta)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:model(X5,X3)<=>?[X6]:model(X6,X4))<=>status(X3,X4,esa)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', esa)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:(![X5]:(model(X5,X3)=>model(X5,X4))<=>status(X3,X4,thm)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', thm)).
% fof(9, axiom,?[X5]:?[X3]:?[X4]:((model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))&?[X6]:model(X6,X4)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', non_thm_spt)).
% fof(33, conjecture,mighta(esa,thm),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', mighta_esa_thm)).
% fof(34, negated_conjecture,~(mighta(esa,thm)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[33])).
% fof(39, plain,?[X5]:?[X3]:?[X4]:((model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))&?[X6]:model(X6,X4)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[9,theory(equality)])).
% fof(50, negated_conjecture,~(mighta(esa,thm)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[34,theory(equality)])).
% fof(51, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,X1))|~(status(X3,X4,X2)))|mighta(X1,X2))&(~(mighta(X1,X2))|?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&status(X3,X4,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(52, plain,(![X1]:![X2]:(![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,X1))|~(status(X3,X4,X2)))|mighta(X1,X2))&![X1]:![X2]:(~(mighta(X1,X2))|?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&status(X3,X4,X2)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[51])).
% fof(53, plain,(![X5]:![X6]:(![X7]:![X8]:(~(status(X7,X8,X5))|~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|mighta(X5,X6))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(mighta(X9,X10))|?[X11]:?[X12]:(status(X11,X12,X9)&status(X11,X12,X10)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[52])).
% fof(54, plain,(![X5]:![X6]:(![X7]:![X8]:(~(status(X7,X8,X5))|~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|mighta(X5,X6))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(mighta(X9,X10))|(status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X9)&status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X10)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[53])).
% fof(55, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:![X10]:(((~(status(X7,X8,X5))|~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|mighta(X5,X6))&(~(mighta(X9,X10))|(status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X9)&status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X10)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[54])).
% fof(56, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:![X10]:(((~(status(X7,X8,X5))|~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|mighta(X5,X6))&((status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X9)|~(mighta(X9,X10)))&(status(esk1_2(X9,X10),esk2_2(X9,X10),X10)|~(mighta(X9,X10))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[55])).
% cnf(59,plain,(mighta(X1,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X2)|~status(X3,X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[56])).
% fof(60, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((((![X5]:~(model(X5,X3))|![X6]:~(model(X6,X4)))&(?[X5]:model(X5,X3)|?[X6]:model(X6,X4)))|status(X3,X4,esa))&(~(status(X3,X4,esa))|((![X5]:~(model(X5,X3))|?[X6]:model(X6,X4))&(![X6]:~(model(X6,X4))|?[X5]:model(X5,X3))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(61, plain,(![X3]:![X4]:(((![X5]:~(model(X5,X3))|![X6]:~(model(X6,X4)))&(?[X5]:model(X5,X3)|?[X6]:model(X6,X4)))|status(X3,X4,esa))&![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,esa))|((![X5]:~(model(X5,X3))|?[X6]:model(X6,X4))&(![X6]:~(model(X6,X4))|?[X5]:model(X5,X3))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[60])).
% fof(62, plain,(![X7]:![X8]:(((![X9]:~(model(X9,X7))|![X10]:~(model(X10,X8)))&(?[X11]:model(X11,X7)|?[X12]:model(X12,X8)))|status(X7,X8,esa))&![X13]:![X14]:(~(status(X13,X14,esa))|((![X15]:~(model(X15,X13))|?[X16]:model(X16,X14))&(![X17]:~(model(X17,X14))|?[X18]:model(X18,X13))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[61])).
% fof(63, plain,(![X7]:![X8]:(((![X9]:~(model(X9,X7))|![X10]:~(model(X10,X8)))&(model(esk3_2(X7,X8),X7)|model(esk4_2(X7,X8),X8)))|status(X7,X8,esa))&![X13]:![X14]:(~(status(X13,X14,esa))|((![X15]:~(model(X15,X13))|model(esk5_2(X13,X14),X14))&(![X17]:~(model(X17,X14))|model(esk6_2(X13,X14),X13))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[62])).
% fof(64, plain,![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:![X10]:![X13]:![X14]:![X15]:![X17]:((((~(model(X9,X7))|~(model(X10,X8)))&(model(esk3_2(X7,X8),X7)|model(esk4_2(X7,X8),X8)))|status(X7,X8,esa))&(~(status(X13,X14,esa))|((~(model(X15,X13))|model(esk5_2(X13,X14),X14))&(~(model(X17,X14))|model(esk6_2(X13,X14),X13))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[63])).
% fof(65, plain,![X7]:![X8]:![X9]:![X10]:![X13]:![X14]:![X15]:![X17]:((((~(model(X9,X7))|~(model(X10,X8)))|status(X7,X8,esa))&((model(esk3_2(X7,X8),X7)|model(esk4_2(X7,X8),X8))|status(X7,X8,esa)))&(((~(model(X15,X13))|model(esk5_2(X13,X14),X14))|~(status(X13,X14,esa)))&((~(model(X17,X14))|model(esk6_2(X13,X14),X13))|~(status(X13,X14,esa))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[64])).
% cnf(69,plain,(status(X1,X2,esa)|~model(X3,X2)|~model(X4,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65])).
% fof(70, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:(model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,thm))&(~(status(X3,X4,thm))|![X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|model(X5,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(71, plain,(![X3]:![X4]:(?[X5]:(model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,thm))&![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,thm))|![X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|model(X5,X4)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[70])).
% fof(72, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:(?[X8]:(model(X8,X6)&~(model(X8,X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|![X11]:(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[71])).
% fof(73, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:((model(esk7_2(X6,X7),X6)&~(model(esk7_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|![X11]:(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[72])).
% fof(74, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:(((model(esk7_2(X6,X7),X6)&~(model(esk7_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[73])).
% fof(75, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:(((model(esk7_2(X6,X7),X6)|status(X6,X7,thm))&(~(model(esk7_2(X6,X7),X7))|status(X6,X7,thm)))&(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[74])).
% cnf(77,plain,(status(X1,X2,thm)|~model(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[75])).
% cnf(78,plain,(status(X1,X2,thm)|model(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[75])).
% fof(104, plain,?[X7]:?[X8]:?[X9]:((model(X7,X8)&~(model(X7,X9)))&?[X10]:model(X10,X9)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[39])).
% fof(105, plain,((model(esk23_0,esk24_0)&~(model(esk23_0,esk25_0)))&model(esk26_0,esk25_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[104])).
% cnf(106,plain,(model(esk26_0,esk25_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[105])).
% cnf(325,negated_conjecture,(~mighta(esa,thm)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[50])).
% cnf(359,plain,(status(X1,X1,thm)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[77,78,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(364,plain,(status(esk25_0,X1,esa)|~model(X2,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[69,106,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(716,plain,(mighta(X1,thm)|~status(X2,X2,X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[59,359,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(795,plain,(status(esk25_0,esk25_0,esa)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[364,106,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2046,plain,(mighta(esa,thm)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[716,795,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2049,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[2046,325,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2050,plain,($false),2049,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% PrfWatch: 0.05 CPU 0.08 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.05 CPU 0.08 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP19004/KRS256+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------