TSTP Solution File: KRS256+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS256+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.65s 2.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 0 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(esa,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-twi8g523/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( mighta(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-twi8g523/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_77,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-twi8g523/lgb.p',i_0_77) ).
cnf(i_0_17,plain,
( status(X1,X2,esa)
| ~ model(X3,X2)
| ~ model(X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-twi8g523/lgb.p',i_0_17) ).
cnf(i_0_72,plain,
model(X1,esk48_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-twi8g523/lgb.p',i_0_72) ).
cnf(i_0_50,plain,
( model(X1,X2)
| model(X1,not(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-twi8g523/lgb.p',i_0_50) ).
cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(esa,thm),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
( mighta(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X4,X1) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
( ~ status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ status(X1,X2,esa) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_85]) ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_77 ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
( ~ status(X1,X2,esa)
| ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_87]) ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
( status(X1,X2,esa)
| ~ model(X3,X2)
| ~ model(X4,X1) ),
i_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
( ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ model(X3,X1)
| ~ model(X4,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_89]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
model(X1,esk48_0),
i_0_72 ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( model(X1,X2)
| model(X1,not(X2)) ),
i_0_50 ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
~ model(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_91]),c_0_91])]) ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_93]),c_0_93]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : KRS256+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 19:28:37 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.44 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.44 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.65/2.30 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.65/2.30 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.65/2.30 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.65/2.30 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YA
% 7.65/2.30 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.65/2.30 #
% 7.65/2.30 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 7.65/2.30 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.65/2.30
% 7.65/2.30 # Proof found!
% 7.65/2.30 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.65/2.30 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.65/2.30 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.65/2.30
% 7.65/2.30 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.65/2.30 # User time : 0.020 s
% 7.65/2.30 # System time : 0.003 s
% 7.65/2.30 # Total time : 0.023 s
% 7.65/2.30 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.65/2.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------