TSTP Solution File: KRS202+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : KRS202+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:32:11 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 28.47s 28.63s
% Output   : Proof 28.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : KRS202+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 06:49:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 28.47/28.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 28.47/28.63  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 28.47/28.63  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 28.47/28.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 28.47/28.63  1. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)))   ### Axiom
% 28.47/28.63  2. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)))   ### Axiom
% 28.47/28.63  3. (-. ((Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0))   ### NotEquiv 1 2
% 28.47/28.63  4. (-. (status T_0 T_1 (esa))) (status T_0 T_1 (esa))   ### Axiom
% 28.47/28.63  5. (((Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))) <=> (status T_0 T_1 (esa))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (esa))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))   ### Equiv 3 4
% 28.47/28.63  6. (All C, (((Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status T_0 C (esa)))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (esa)))   ### All 5
% 28.47/28.63  7. (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (esa))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1))   ### All 6
% 28.47/28.63  8. (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm))) (status T_0 T_1 (thm))   ### Axiom
% 28.47/28.63  9. (-. (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm)))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm)))   ### NotNot 8
% 28.47/28.63  10. (-. ((status T_0 T_1 (esa)) /\ (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm))))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa)))))   ### NotAnd 7 9
% 28.47/28.63  11. (-. (Ex C, ((status T_0 C (esa)) /\ (-. (status T_0 C (thm)))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm)))   ### NotExists 10
% 28.47/28.63  12. (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 (thm))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa)))))   ### NotExists 11
% 28.47/28.63  13. (model T_2 T_0) (-. (model T_2 T_0))   ### Axiom
% 28.47/28.63  14. (-. (model T_2 T_1)) (model T_2 T_1)   ### Axiom
% 28.47/28.63  15. ((model T_2 T_0) => (model T_2 T_1)) (-. (model T_2 T_1)) (model T_2 T_0)   ### Imply 13 14
% 28.47/28.63  16. (All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1))) (model T_2 T_0) (-. (model T_2 T_1))   ### All 15
% 28.47/28.63  17. ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 T_1))) <=> (status T_0 T_1 (thm))) (-. (model T_2 T_1)) (model T_2 T_0) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm)))))))   ### Equiv 12 16
% 28.47/28.63  18. (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status T_0 C (thm)))) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (model T_2 T_0) (-. (model T_2 T_1))   ### All 17
% 28.47/28.63  19. (-. (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0)))) (-. (model T_2 T_1)) (model T_2 T_0) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status T_0 C (thm))))   ### NotNot 18
% 28.47/28.63  20. (model T_2 T_0) (-. (model T_2 T_0))   ### Axiom
% 28.47/28.63  21. (-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0))) (model T_2 T_0)   ### NotExists 20
% 28.47/28.63  22. ((-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0))) <=> (status T_0 zenon_X3 (cax))) (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status T_0 C (thm)))) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (model T_2 T_0) (-. (model T_2 T_1))   ### Equiv 19 21
% 28.47/28.63  23. (All C, ((-. (Ex I2, (model I2 T_0))) <=> (status T_0 C (cax)))) (-. (model T_2 T_1)) (model T_2 T_0) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status T_0 C (thm))))   ### All 22
% 28.47/28.63  24. (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 T_0) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status T_0 C (thm)))) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (model T_2 T_0) (-. (model T_2 T_1))   ### All 23
% 28.47/28.63  25. (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (-. (model T_2 T_1)) (model T_2 T_0) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax)))))   ### All 24
% 28.47/28.63  26. ((model T_2 T_0) /\ ((-. (model T_2 T_1)) /\ (Ex I2, (model I2 T_1)))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm)))))   ### ConjTree 25
% 28.47/28.63  27. (Ex C, ((model T_2 T_0) /\ ((-. (model T_2 C)) /\ (Ex I2, (model I2 C))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax)))))   ### Exists 26
% 28.47/28.63  28. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((model T_2 Ax) /\ ((-. (model T_2 C)) /\ (Ex I2, (model I2 C)))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm)))))   ### Exists 27
% 28.47/28.63  29. (Ex I1, (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((model I1 Ax) /\ ((-. (model I1 C)) /\ (Ex I2, (model I2 C))))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (-. (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((status Ax C (esa)) /\ (-. (status Ax C (thm))))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax)))))   ### Exists 28
% 28.47/28.63  30. (-. (nota (esa) (thm))) (All Ax, (All C, ((-. (Ex I1, (model I1 Ax))) <=> (status Ax C (cax))))) (All Ax, (All C, (((Ex I1, (model I1 Ax)) <=> (Ex I2, (model I2 C))) <=> (status Ax C (esa))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((All I1, ((model I1 Ax) => (model I1 C))) <=> (status Ax C (thm))))) (Ex I1, (Ex Ax, (Ex C, ((model I1 Ax) /\ ((-. (model I1 C)) /\ (Ex I2, (model I2 C)))))))   ### Definition-Pseudo(nota) 29
% 28.47/28.63  % SZS output end Proof
% 28.47/28.63  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------