TSTP Solution File: KRS194+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS194+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.88s 2.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   6 unt;   4 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   22 (   0 equ;  10 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ isa(sca,thm),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mkoqfr7l/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).

cnf(i_0_26,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mkoqfr7l/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mkoqfr7l/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_64,plain,
    ( ~ model(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(X2,X3,sca) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mkoqfr7l/lgb.p',i_0_64) ).

cnf(i_0_78,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,thm)
    | model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-mkoqfr7l/lgb.p',i_0_78) ).

cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
    ~ isa(sca,thm),
    i_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    ( ~ model(X1,X2)
    | ~ status(X2,X3,sca) ),
    i_0_64 ).

cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
    status(esk13_2(sca,thm),esk14_2(sca,thm),sca),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_85]) ).

cnf(c_0_89,negated_conjecture,
    ~ status(esk13_2(sca,thm),esk14_2(sca,thm),thm),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_86]) ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( status(X1,X2,thm)
    | model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_78 ).

cnf(c_0_91,plain,
    ~ model(X1,esk13_2(sca,thm)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]),c_0_91]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : KRS194+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 06:10:19 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.22/0.49  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.22/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.88/2.53  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.88/2.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.88/2.53  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.88/2.53  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YA
% 8.88/2.53  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.88/2.53  #
% 8.88/2.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 8.88/2.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.88/2.53  
% 8.88/2.53  # Proof found!
% 8.88/2.53  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.88/2.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.88/2.53  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.88/2.53  
% 8.88/2.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.88/2.53  # User time                : 0.032 s
% 8.88/2.53  # System time              : 0.011 s
% 8.88/2.53  # Total time               : 0.043 s
% 8.88/2.53  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.88/2.53  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------