TSTP Solution File: KRS193+1 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : KRS193+1 : TPTP v5.3.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2800MHz
% Memory   : 2005MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.32.26-175.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jun 15 10:47:22 EDT 2012

% Result   : Theorem 3.69s
% Output   : Solution 3.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13273/KRS193+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13273/KRS193+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13273/KRS193+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.5/eproof_ram --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-format /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 13387
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.04 WC
% PrfWatch: 1.91 CPU 2.06 WC
% # Auto-Ordering is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHNFNFFMM21LS
% # Auto-mode selected ordering type KBO6
% # Auto-mode selected ordering precedence scheme <invfreq>
% # Auto-mode selected weight ordering scheme <invfreqrank>
% #
% # Auto-Heuristic is analysing problem.
% # Problem is type GHNFNFFMM21LS
% # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S
% # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% #
% # No equality, disabling AC handling.
% #
% # Initializing proof state
% # Proof found!
% # SZS status Theorem
% # Parsed axioms                      : 33
% # Removed by relevancy pruning       : 0
% # Initial clauses                    : 109
% # Removed in clause preprocessing    : 0
% # Initial clauses in saturation      : 109
% # Processed clauses                  : 4081
% # ...of these trivial                : 456
% # ...subsumed                        : 894
% # ...remaining for further processing: 2731
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 7
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 21
% # Generated clauses                  : 68165
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 54532
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 33
% # Paramodulations                    : 67999
% # Factorizations                     : 166
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 2703
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 644
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 342
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 1717
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 47508
% # ...number of literals in the above : 191702
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 359708
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 240386
% # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions: 702
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 79311
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # BW rewrite match attempts          : 777
% # BW rewrite match successes         : 24
% # Backwards rewriting index :  8082 nodes,  1645 leaves,   1.58+/-3.281 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index      :  3610 nodes,   772 leaves,   1.19+/-1.192 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index      :  6301 nodes,  1247 leaves,   1.14+/-0.955 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-neg-atom index  :  1521 nodes,   326 leaves,   2.35+/-3.836 terms/leaf
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(![X3]:![X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)=>status(X3,X4,X2))<=>isa(X1,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', isa)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:(![X5]:(model(X5,X3)=>model(X5,X4))<=>status(X3,X4,thm)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', thm)).
% fof(3, axiom,![X3]:![X4]:(~(?[X5]:model(X5,X3))<=>status(X3,X4,cax)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', cax)).
% fof(33, conjecture,isa(cax,thm),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', isa_cax_thm)).
% fof(34, negated_conjecture,~(isa(cax,thm)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[33])).
% fof(50, negated_conjecture,~(isa(cax,thm)),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[34,theory(equality)])).
% fof(51, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&~(status(X3,X4,X2)))|isa(X1,X2))&(~(isa(X1,X2))|![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,X1))|status(X3,X4,X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(52, plain,(![X1]:![X2]:(?[X3]:?[X4]:(status(X3,X4,X1)&~(status(X3,X4,X2)))|isa(X1,X2))&![X1]:![X2]:(~(isa(X1,X2))|![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,X1))|status(X3,X4,X2)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[51])).
% fof(53, plain,(![X5]:![X6]:(?[X7]:?[X8]:(status(X7,X8,X5)&~(status(X7,X8,X6)))|isa(X5,X6))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(isa(X9,X10))|![X11]:![X12]:(~(status(X11,X12,X9))|status(X11,X12,X10)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[52])).
% fof(54, plain,(![X5]:![X6]:((status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X5)&~(status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X6)))|isa(X5,X6))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(isa(X9,X10))|![X11]:![X12]:(~(status(X11,X12,X9))|status(X11,X12,X10)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[53])).
% fof(55, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:![X12]:(((status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X5)&~(status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X6)))|isa(X5,X6))&(~(isa(X9,X10))|(~(status(X11,X12,X9))|status(X11,X12,X10)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[54])).
% fof(56, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:![X12]:(((status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X5)|isa(X5,X6))&(~(status(esk1_2(X5,X6),esk2_2(X5,X6),X6))|isa(X5,X6)))&(~(isa(X9,X10))|(~(status(X11,X12,X9))|status(X11,X12,X10)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[55])).
% cnf(58,plain,(isa(X1,X2)|~status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[56])).
% cnf(59,plain,(isa(X1,X2)|status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[56])).
% fof(60, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:(model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,thm))&(~(status(X3,X4,thm))|![X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|model(X5,X4)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2])).
% fof(61, plain,(![X3]:![X4]:(?[X5]:(model(X5,X3)&~(model(X5,X4)))|status(X3,X4,thm))&![X3]:![X4]:(~(status(X3,X4,thm))|![X5]:(~(model(X5,X3))|model(X5,X4)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[60])).
% fof(62, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:(?[X8]:(model(X8,X6)&~(model(X8,X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|![X11]:(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[61])).
% fof(63, plain,(![X6]:![X7]:((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)&~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&![X9]:![X10]:(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|![X11]:(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[62])).
% fof(64, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:(((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)&~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7)))|status(X6,X7,thm))&(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[63])).
% fof(65, plain,![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:(((model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X6)|status(X6,X7,thm))&(~(model(esk3_2(X6,X7),X7))|status(X6,X7,thm)))&(~(status(X9,X10,thm))|(~(model(X11,X9))|model(X11,X10)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[64])).
% cnf(68,plain,(status(X1,X2,thm)|model(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65])).
% fof(69, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((?[X5]:model(X5,X3)|status(X3,X4,cax))&(~(status(X3,X4,cax))|![X5]:~(model(X5,X3)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(70, plain,(![X3]:(?[X5]:model(X5,X3)|![X4]:status(X3,X4,cax))&![X3]:(![X4]:~(status(X3,X4,cax))|![X5]:~(model(X5,X3)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[69])).
% fof(71, plain,(![X6]:(?[X7]:model(X7,X6)|![X8]:status(X6,X8,cax))&![X9]:(![X10]:~(status(X9,X10,cax))|![X11]:~(model(X11,X9)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[70])).
% fof(72, plain,(![X6]:(model(esk4_1(X6),X6)|![X8]:status(X6,X8,cax))&![X9]:(![X10]:~(status(X9,X10,cax))|![X11]:~(model(X11,X9)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[71])).
% fof(73, plain,![X6]:![X8]:![X9]:![X10]:![X11]:((model(esk4_1(X6),X6)|status(X6,X8,cax))&(~(status(X9,X10,cax))|~(model(X11,X9)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[72])).
% cnf(74,plain,(~model(X1,X2)|~status(X2,X3,cax)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[73])).
% cnf(325,negated_conjecture,(~isa(cax,thm)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[50])).
% cnf(414,plain,(isa(cax,X2)|~model(X1,esk1_2(cax,X2))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[74,59,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(806,plain,(isa(cax,X1)|status(esk1_2(cax,X1),X2,thm)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[414,68,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85680,plain,(isa(cax,thm)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[58,806,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85703,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[85680,325,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(85704,plain,($false),85703,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% PrfWatch: 3.07 CPU 3.22 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 3.07 CPU 3.22 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP13273/KRS193+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------