TSTP Solution File: KRS191+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS191+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.05s 2.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 6 unt; 2 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wtc,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rrnfupvc/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_26,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rrnfupvc/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| ~ status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rrnfupvc/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_95,plain,
( model(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X2,wtc) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rrnfupvc/lgb.p',i_0_95) ).
cnf(i_0_77,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rrnfupvc/lgb.p',i_0_77) ).
cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(wtc,thm),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_102,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_103,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| ~ status(esk13_2(X1,X2),esk14_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_104,plain,
( model(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X2,wtc) ),
i_0_95 ).
cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
status(esk13_2(wtc,thm),esk14_2(wtc,thm),wtc),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_102]) ).
cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
~ status(esk13_2(wtc,thm),esk14_2(wtc,thm),thm),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_103]) ).
cnf(c_0_107,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk51_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_77 ).
cnf(c_0_108,plain,
model(X1,esk14_2(wtc,thm)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_105]) ).
cnf(c_0_109,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_106,c_0_107]),c_0_108])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : KRS191+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 10:38:22 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.05/2.73 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.05/2.73 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.05/2.73 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.05/2.73 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YA
% 9.05/2.73 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 9.05/2.73 #
% 9.05/2.73 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 9.05/2.73 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.05/2.73
% 9.05/2.73 # Proof found!
% 9.05/2.73 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.05/2.73 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.05/2.73 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.05/2.73
% 9.05/2.73 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.05/2.73 # User time : 0.032 s
% 9.05/2.73 # System time : 0.011 s
% 9.05/2.73 # Total time : 0.043 s
% 9.05/2.73 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 9.05/2.73
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------