TSTP Solution File: KRS179+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : KRS179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:32:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.34s 2.56s
% Output   : Proof 2.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : KRS179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 06:13:03 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.34/2.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.34/2.56  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.34/2.56  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.34/2.56  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.34/2.56  1. (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_2))   ### Axiom
% 2.34/2.56  2. (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_3)) (status T_0 T_1 T_3)   ### Axiom
% 2.34/2.56  3. ((status T_0 T_1 T_2) => (status T_0 T_1 T_3)) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_3)) (status T_0 T_1 T_2)   ### Imply 1 2
% 2.34/2.56  4. (All C, ((status T_0 C T_2) => (status T_0 C T_3))) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_3))   ### All 3
% 2.34/2.56  5. (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_3)) (status T_0 T_1 T_2)   ### All 4
% 2.34/2.56  6. (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4)) (status T_0 T_1 T_4)   ### Axiom
% 2.34/2.56  7. ((status T_0 T_1 T_3) => (status T_0 T_1 T_4)) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4)) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3))))   ### Imply 5 6
% 2.34/2.56  8. (All C, ((status T_0 C T_3) => (status T_0 C T_4))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4))   ### All 7
% 2.34/2.56  9. (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_3) => (status Ax C T_4)))) (-. (status T_0 T_1 T_4)) (status T_0 T_1 T_2) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3))))   ### All 8
% 2.34/2.56  10. (-. ((status T_0 T_1 T_2) => (status T_0 T_1 T_4))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_3) => (status Ax C T_4))))   ### NotImply 9
% 2.34/2.56  11. (-. (All C, ((status T_0 C T_2) => (status T_0 C T_4)))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_3) => (status Ax C T_4)))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3))))   ### NotAllEx 10
% 2.34/2.56  12. (-. (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_4))))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_3) => (status Ax C T_4))))   ### NotAllEx 11
% 2.34/2.56  13. (-. (isa T_2 T_4)) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_3) => (status Ax C T_4)))) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3))))   ### Definition-Pseudo(isa) 12
% 2.34/2.56  14. (isa T_3 T_4) (All Ax, (All C, ((status Ax C T_2) => (status Ax C T_3)))) (-. (isa T_2 T_4))   ### Definition-Pseudo(isa) 13
% 2.34/2.56  15. (isa T_2 T_3) (-. (isa T_2 T_4)) (isa T_3 T_4)   ### Definition-Pseudo(isa) 14
% 2.34/2.56  16. (-. (((isa T_2 T_3) /\ (isa T_3 T_4)) => (isa T_2 T_4)))   ### ConjTree 15
% 2.34/2.56  17. (-. (All S3, (((isa T_2 T_3) /\ (isa T_3 S3)) => (isa T_2 S3))))   ### NotAllEx 16
% 2.34/2.56  18. (-. (All S2, (All S3, (((isa T_2 S2) /\ (isa S2 S3)) => (isa T_2 S3)))))   ### NotAllEx 17
% 2.34/2.56  19. (-. (All S1, (All S2, (All S3, (((isa S1 S2) /\ (isa S2 S3)) => (isa S1 S3))))))   ### NotAllEx 18
% 2.34/2.56  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.34/2.56  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------