TSTP Solution File: KRS178+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS178+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.73s 2.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 4 unt; 2 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| ~ status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jvvv4yvv/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_3,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jvvv4yvv/lgb.p',i_0_3) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(esk3_0,esk3_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jvvv4yvv/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| ~ status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( isa(X1,X2)
| status(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk2_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(esk3_0,esk3_0),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
isa(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : KRS178+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 16:29:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 4.73/2.24 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.73/2.24 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.73/2.24 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.73/2.24 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___041_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 4.73/2.24 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 4.73/2.24 #
% 4.73/2.24 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 4.73/2.24
% 4.73/2.24 # Proof found!
% 4.73/2.24 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.73/2.24 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.73/2.24 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.73/2.24
% 4.73/2.24 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.73/2.24 # User time : 0.011 s
% 4.73/2.24 # System time : 0.006 s
% 4.73/2.24 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 4.73/2.24 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 4.73/2.24
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------