TSTP Solution File: KRS171+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : KRS171+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.70s 0.93s
% Output : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS171+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 17:01:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35 Tue Jun 7 17:01:16 2022
% 0.13/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 18409.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 8
% 0.19/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 10
% 0.19/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 80
% 0.19/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 10
% 0.19/0.44 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.19/0.44 distinct function count: 0
% 0.19/0.44 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.44
% 0.19/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.70/0.93 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.70/0.93 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Model 3 [ 1 1 201 ] (0.00 seconds, 201944 Inserts)
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Model 4 [ 1 1 125 ] (0.00 seconds, 117025 Inserts)
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Model 5 [ 2 0 89 ] (0.00 seconds, 116206 Inserts)
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.55 sec ----> 22 [hyper,21,2,20] {-} $F.
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Length of proof is 11. Level of proof is 8.
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.70/0.93 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.70/0.93 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 1 [] {+} -cowlNothing(A).
% 0.70/0.93 2 [] {+} -xsd_string(A)| -xsd_integer(A).
% 0.70/0.93 3 [] {+} -rhasHead(A,B)|rhasLeader(A,B).
% 0.70/0.93 4 [] {+} -rhasLeader(A,B)|rhasHead(A,B).
% 0.70/0.93 5 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 6 [copy,5,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 7 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasLeader($c4,$c3)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 8 [copy,7,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasLeader($c4,$c3)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 9 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 10 [copy,9,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 11 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasLeader($c4,$c3)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 12 [copy,11,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasLeader($c4,$c3)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 13 [] {+} cowlThing(A).
% 0.70/0.93 14 [] {+} xsd_string(A)|xsd_integer(A).
% 0.70/0.93 15 [hyper,14,10,13,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 16 [hyper,15,6,13,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c4,$c3)|xsd_string($c2).
% 0.70/0.93 17 [hyper,16,2,15,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 18 [hyper,17,4,factor_simp] {+} rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 19 [hyper,18,3] {+} rhasLeader($c4,$c3).
% 0.70/0.93 20 [hyper,19,12,13,14,18,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.70/0.93 21 [hyper,20,8,13,19,18] {+} xsd_string($c2).
% 0.70/0.93 22 [hyper,21,2,20] {-} $F.
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.70/0.93 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 ============ end of search ============
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 true clauses given 5 (55.6%)
% 0.70/0.93 false clauses given 4
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 FALSE TRUE
% 0.70/0.93 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Model 5 [ 2 0 89 ] (0.00 seconds, 116206 Inserts)
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.70/0.93
% 0.70/0.93 Process 18409 finished Tue Jun 7 17:01:17 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------