TSTP Solution File: KRS171+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS171+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.24s 2.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (   7 unt;  13 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   81 (   0 equ;  37 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ~ cowlNothing(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | ~ rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( rhasHead(X1,X2)
    | ~ rhasLeader(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    ( xsd_string(X1)
    | xsd_integer(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    ( rhasLeader(X1,X2)
    | ~ rhasHead(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | ~ rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ xsd_string(X1)
    | ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-jg8uh1_n/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ~ cowlNothing(X1),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | ~ rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( rhasHead(X1,X2)
    | ~ rhasLeader(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( xsd_string(X1)
    | xsd_integer(X1) ),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | ~ rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( rhasLeader(X1,X2)
    | ~ rhasHead(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
    | ~ rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ xsd_string(X1)
    | ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    xsd_string(esk2_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_25]),c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | ~ rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( cowlNothing(esk1_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_31])]),c_0_33]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( rhasLeader(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    | xsd_integer(esk2_0)
    | ~ xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ~ rhasHead(esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_31])]),c_0_35]),c_0_37]),c_0_33]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09  % Problem  : KRS171+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 16:46:07 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.24/2.15  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.24/2.15  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.24/2.15  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.24/2.15  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y
% 4.24/2.15  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 4.24/2.15  #
% 4.24/2.15  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 4.24/2.15  
% 4.24/2.15  # Proof found!
% 4.24/2.15  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.24/2.15  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.24/2.15  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.24/2.15  
% 4.24/2.15  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.24/2.15  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 4.24/2.15  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 4.24/2.15  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 4.24/2.15  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.24/2.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------