TSTP Solution File: KRS170+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : KRS170+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 6.63s 6.86s
% Output   : Refutation 6.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : KRS170+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 15:05:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.37  Tue Jun  7 15:05:05 2022
% 0.20/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 31421.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.20/0.37  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.20/0.37  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.37  
% 0.20/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 3.47/3.65  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 3.47/3.65  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 3.47/3.65  number of clauses in intial UL: 12
% 3.47/3.65  number of clauses initially in problem: 14
% 3.47/3.65  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 3.47/3.65  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 3.47/3.65  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 3.47/3.65  absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 3.47/3.65     distinct predicate count: 6
% 3.47/3.65     distinct function count: 0
% 3.47/3.65     distinct constant count: 6
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.47/3.65  
% 3.47/3.65  =========== start of search ===========
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 6.63/6.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 6.63/6.86  % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Model 3 [ 1 1 1405 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Model 4 [ 1 1 443 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Model 5 [ 1 1 1256 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   6.46 sec ----> 38 [hyper,37,2,36] {-} $F.
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Length of proof is 22.  Level of proof is 15.
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 6.63/6.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 6.63/6.86  % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  1 [] {+} -cowlNothing(A).
% 6.63/6.86  2 [] {+} -xsd_string(A)| -xsd_integer(A).
% 6.63/6.86  3 [] {+} -rhasLeader(A,B)|rhasHead(A,B).
% 6.63/6.86  4 [] {+} rhasLeader(A,B)| -rhasHead(A,B).
% 6.63/6.86  5 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  6 [copy,5,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  7 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)| -rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  8 [copy,7,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)| -rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  9 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  10 [copy,9,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  11 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3)| -rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  12 [copy,11,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3)| -rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  13 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  14 [copy,13,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  15 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)| -rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  16 [copy,15,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)| -rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  17 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  18 [copy,17,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  19 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3)| -rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  20 [copy,19,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -rhasHead($c4,$c3)| -rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  21 [] {+} cowlThing(A).
% 6.63/6.86  22 [] {+} xsd_string(A)|xsd_integer(A).
% 6.63/6.86  23 [hyper,22,14,21,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  24 [hyper,23,6,21,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5)|xsd_string($c2).
% 6.63/6.86  25 [hyper,24,2,23,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  26 [hyper,25,3] {+} rhasHead($c6,$c5)|rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 6.63/6.86  28 [hyper,26,18,21,22,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} rhasHead($c6,$c5)|xsd_integer($c2).
% 6.63/6.86  29 [hyper,28,10,21,26,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} rhasHead($c6,$c5)|xsd_string($c2).
% 6.63/6.86  30 [hyper,29,2,28,factor_simp] {+} rhasHead($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  31 [hyper,30,4] {+} rhasLeader($c6,$c5).
% 6.63/6.86  32 [hyper,31,16,21,22,factor_simp] {-} xsd_integer($c2)|rhasLeader($c4,$c3).
% 6.63/6.86  33 [hyper,32,8,21,31,factor_simp] {+} rhasLeader($c4,$c3)|xsd_string($c2).
% 6.63/6.86  34 [hyper,33,2,32,factor_simp] {+} rhasLeader($c4,$c3).
% 6.63/6.86  35 [hyper,34,3] {+} rhasHead($c4,$c3).
% 6.63/6.86  36 [hyper,35,20,21,22,31,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2).
% 6.63/6.86  37 [hyper,36,12,21,35,31] {+} xsd_string($c2).
% 6.63/6.86  38 [hyper,37,2,36] {-} $F.
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.63/6.86  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  ============ end of search ============
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  true clauses given          11      (68.8%)
% 6.63/6.86  false clauses given          5
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86        FALSE     TRUE
% 6.63/6.86  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Model 5 [ 1 1 1256 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 6.63/6.86  
% 6.63/6.86  Process 31421 finished Tue Jun  7 15:05:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------