TSTP Solution File: KRS169+1 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : KRS169+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 08:39:54 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.87s
% Output : Solution 0.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6834/KRS169+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6834/KRS169+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6834/KRS169+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 6930
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:(cowlThing(X1)&~(cowlNothing(X1))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', axiom_0)).
% fof(2, axiom,![X1]:(xsd_string(X1)<=>~(xsd_integer(X1))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', axiom_1)).
% fof(5, axiom,rhasLeader(iX,iY),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', axiom_3)).
% fof(6, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(rhasLeader(X1,X2)<=>rhasHead(X1,X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', axiom_5)).
% fof(7, conjecture,((((![X1]:(cowlThing(X1)&~(cowlNothing(X1)))&![X1]:(xsd_string(X1)<=>~(xsd_integer(X1))))&cowlThing(iX))&rhasHead(iX,iY))&cowlThing(iY)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', the_axiom)).
% fof(8, negated_conjecture,~(((((![X1]:(cowlThing(X1)&~(cowlNothing(X1)))&![X1]:(xsd_string(X1)<=>~(xsd_integer(X1))))&cowlThing(iX))&rhasHead(iX,iY))&cowlThing(iY))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[7])).
% fof(9, plain,![X1]:(cowlThing(X1)&~(cowlNothing(X1))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[1,theory(equality)])).
% fof(10, plain,![X1]:(xsd_string(X1)<=>~(xsd_integer(X1))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[2,theory(equality)])).
% fof(11, negated_conjecture,~(((((![X1]:(cowlThing(X1)&~(cowlNothing(X1)))&![X1]:(xsd_string(X1)<=>~(xsd_integer(X1))))&cowlThing(iX))&rhasHead(iX,iY))&cowlThing(iY))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[8,theory(equality)])).
% fof(12, plain,![X2]:(cowlThing(X2)&~(cowlNothing(X2))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[9])).
% cnf(13,plain,(~cowlNothing(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12])).
% cnf(14,plain,(cowlThing(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12])).
% fof(15, plain,![X1]:((~(xsd_string(X1))|~(xsd_integer(X1)))&(xsd_integer(X1)|xsd_string(X1))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[10])).
% fof(16, plain,![X2]:((~(xsd_string(X2))|~(xsd_integer(X2)))&(xsd_integer(X2)|xsd_string(X2))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[15])).
% cnf(17,plain,(xsd_string(X1)|xsd_integer(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[16])).
% cnf(18,plain,(~xsd_integer(X1)|~xsd_string(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[16])).
% cnf(21,plain,(rhasLeader(iX,iY)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(22, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(rhasLeader(X1,X2))|rhasHead(X1,X2))&(~(rhasHead(X1,X2))|rhasLeader(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(23, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(rhasLeader(X3,X4))|rhasHead(X3,X4))&(~(rhasHead(X3,X4))|rhasLeader(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22])).
% cnf(25,plain,(rhasHead(X1,X2)|~rhasLeader(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[23])).
% fof(26, negated_conjecture,((((?[X1]:(~(cowlThing(X1))|cowlNothing(X1))|?[X1]:((~(xsd_string(X1))|xsd_integer(X1))&(xsd_string(X1)|~(xsd_integer(X1)))))|~(cowlThing(iX)))|~(rhasHead(iX,iY)))|~(cowlThing(iY))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[11])).
% fof(27, negated_conjecture,((((?[X2]:(~(cowlThing(X2))|cowlNothing(X2))|?[X3]:((~(xsd_string(X3))|xsd_integer(X3))&(xsd_string(X3)|~(xsd_integer(X3)))))|~(cowlThing(iX)))|~(rhasHead(iX,iY)))|~(cowlThing(iY))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(28, negated_conjecture,(((((~(cowlThing(esk1_0))|cowlNothing(esk1_0))|((~(xsd_string(esk2_0))|xsd_integer(esk2_0))&(xsd_string(esk2_0)|~(xsd_integer(esk2_0)))))|~(cowlThing(iX)))|~(rhasHead(iX,iY)))|~(cowlThing(iY))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[27])).
% fof(29, negated_conjecture,((((((~(xsd_string(esk2_0))|xsd_integer(esk2_0))|(~(cowlThing(esk1_0))|cowlNothing(esk1_0)))|~(cowlThing(iX)))|~(rhasHead(iX,iY)))|~(cowlThing(iY)))&(((((xsd_string(esk2_0)|~(xsd_integer(esk2_0)))|(~(cowlThing(esk1_0))|cowlNothing(esk1_0)))|~(cowlThing(iX)))|~(rhasHead(iX,iY)))|~(cowlThing(iY)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[28])).
% cnf(30,negated_conjecture,(cowlNothing(esk1_0)|xsd_string(esk2_0)|~cowlThing(iY)|~rhasHead(iX,iY)|~cowlThing(iX)|~cowlThing(esk1_0)|~xsd_integer(esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(31,negated_conjecture,(cowlNothing(esk1_0)|xsd_integer(esk2_0)|~cowlThing(iY)|~rhasHead(iX,iY)|~cowlThing(iX)|~cowlThing(esk1_0)|~xsd_string(esk2_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(34,negated_conjecture,(cowlNothing(esk1_0)|xsd_string(esk2_0)|$false|$false|$false|~xsd_integer(esk2_0)|~rhasHead(iX,iY)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[30,14,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(35,negated_conjecture,(cowlNothing(esk1_0)|xsd_integer(esk2_0)|$false|$false|$false|~xsd_string(esk2_0)|~rhasHead(iX,iY)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[31,14,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]),14,theory(equality)]),['unfolding']).
% cnf(36,negated_conjecture,(xsd_string(esk2_0)|~xsd_integer(esk2_0)|~rhasHead(iX,iY)),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[34,13,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(37,negated_conjecture,(xsd_string(esk2_0)|~rhasHead(iX,iY)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[36,17])).
% cnf(38,negated_conjecture,(xsd_integer(esk2_0)|~xsd_string(esk2_0)|~rhasHead(iX,iY)),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[35,13,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(39,negated_conjecture,(xsd_integer(esk2_0)|~rhasHead(iX,iY)),inference(csr,[status(thm)],[38,17])).
% cnf(41,plain,(rhasHead(iX,iY)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[25,21,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(43,negated_conjecture,(xsd_integer(esk2_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[39,41,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(44,negated_conjecture,(xsd_integer(esk2_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[43,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(45,negated_conjecture,(xsd_string(esk2_0)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[37,41,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(46,negated_conjecture,(xsd_string(esk2_0)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[45,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(47,negated_conjecture,(~xsd_string(esk2_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[18,44,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(48,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[47,46,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(49,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[48,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(50,negated_conjecture,($false),49,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 20
% # ...of these trivial : 0
% # ...subsumed : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 20
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 2
% # Generated clauses : 4
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 4
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% # Paramodulations : 4
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 9
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 4
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 1
% # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 1
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 1
% # Backwards rewriting index: 13 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 6 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 10 leaves, 1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.008 s
% # System time : 0.004 s
% # Total time : 0.012 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.17 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.09 CPU 0.17 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6834/KRS169+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------