TSTP Solution File: KRS152+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:59:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 114 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 138 ( 57 ~; 54 |; 22 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 6 sgn 17 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
( ! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& cowlThing(iV21080)
& cC12(iV21080)
& cC10(iV21081)
& cowlThing(iV21081) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',the_axiom) ).
fof(axiom_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_0) ).
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cC10(X1)
<=> ( cC2(X1)
& cC4(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_1) ).
fof(axiom_3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cC12(X1)
<=> ? [X2] :
( rR1(X1,X2)
& cC10(X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_3) ).
fof(axiom_15,axiom,
cC4(iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_15) ).
fof(axiom_14,axiom,
cC2(iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_14) ).
fof(axiom_11,axiom,
rR1(iV21080,iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',axiom_11) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& cowlThing(iV21080)
& cC12(iV21080)
& cC10(iV21081)
& cowlThing(iV21081) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[the_axiom]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ xsd_string(esk3_0)
| xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21081) )
& ( xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21081) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( cowlThing(X2)
& ~ cowlNothing(X2) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_0])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( ( cC2(X2)
| ~ cC10(X2) )
& ( cC4(X2)
| ~ cC10(X2) )
& ( ~ cC2(X2)
| ~ cC4(X2)
| cC10(X2) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21081)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
cowlThing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X2,X2] :
( ( ~ xsd_string(X2)
| ~ xsd_integer(X2) )
& ( xsd_integer(X2)
| xsd_string(X2) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X3,X3,X5] :
( ( rR1(X3,esk4_1(X3))
| ~ cC12(X3) )
& ( cC10(esk4_1(X3))
| ~ cC12(X3) )
& ( ~ rR1(X3,X5)
| ~ cC10(X5)
| cC12(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( cC10(X1)
| ~ cC4(X1)
| ~ cC2(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
cC4(iV21081),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
cC2(iV21081),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( xsd_string(X1)
| xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( cC12(X1)
| ~ cC10(X2)
| ~ rR1(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
rR1(iV21080,iV21081),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
cC10(iV21081),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21081)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
cC12(iV21080),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( cowlNothing(esk2_0)
| xsd_integer(esk3_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk3_0)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cC12(iV21080) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
xsd_string(esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_24])]),c_0_27])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ xsd_integer(X1)
| ~ xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
xsd_integer(esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_24])]),c_0_19]),c_0_27]),c_0_29])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_29])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 09:08:20 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 33
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 19
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 14
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 25
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 26
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 23
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 30
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 29
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 21
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 17
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 21
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 19
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1376
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2696 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------