TSTP Solution File: KRS152+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:13:20 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 113 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 140 ( 61 ~; 48 |; 24 &)
% ( 7 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 2 sgn 15 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
( ! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& cowlThing(iV21080)
& cC12(iV21080)
& cC10(iV21081)
& cowlThing(iV21081) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p',the_axiom) ).
fof(axiom_0,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p',axiom_0) ).
fof(axiom_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p',axiom_1) ).
fof(axiom_6,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cTEST(X1)
<=> ( cC12(X1)
& ~ cC8(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p',axiom_6) ).
fof(axiom_7,axiom,
cTEST(iV21080),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p',axiom_7) ).
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cC10(X1)
<=> ( cC2(X1)
& cC4(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_15,axiom,
cC4(iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p',axiom_15) ).
fof(axiom_14,axiom,
cC2(iV21081),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p',axiom_14) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) )
& ! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) )
& cowlThing(iV21080)
& cC12(iV21080)
& cC10(iV21081)
& cowlThing(iV21081) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[the_axiom])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1] :
( cowlThing(X1)
& ~ cowlNothing(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_0]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1] :
( xsd_string(X1)
<=> ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_1]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
| xsd_integer(esk2_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| cowlNothing(esk1_0)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21081) )
& ( xsd_string(esk2_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| cowlNothing(esk1_0)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21081) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X13] :
( cowlThing(X13)
& ~ cowlNothing(X13) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X12] :
( ( ~ xsd_string(X12)
| ~ xsd_integer(X12) )
& ( xsd_integer(X12)
| xsd_string(X12) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1] :
( cTEST(X1)
<=> ( cC12(X1)
& ~ cC8(X1) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( xsd_string(esk2_0)
| cowlNothing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21081) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
cowlThing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
~ cowlNothing(X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ xsd_string(X1)
| ~ xsd_integer(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( xsd_integer(esk2_0)
| cowlNothing(esk1_0)
| ~ xsd_string(esk2_0)
| ~ cowlThing(esk1_0)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21080)
| ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ cowlThing(iV21081) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X10] :
( ( cC12(X10)
| ~ cTEST(X10) )
& ( ~ cC8(X10)
| ~ cTEST(X10) )
& ( ~ cC12(X10)
| cC8(X10)
| cTEST(X10) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ xsd_integer(esk2_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( xsd_integer(X1)
| xsd_string(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081)
| ~ xsd_string(esk2_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]),c_0_16]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( cC12(X1)
| ~ cTEST(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
cTEST(iV21080),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_7]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X5] :
( ( cC2(X5)
| ~ cC10(X5) )
& ( cC4(X5)
| ~ cC10(X5) )
& ( ~ cC2(X5)
| ~ cC4(X5)
| cC10(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ cC12(iV21080)
| ~ cC10(iV21081) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
cC12(iV21080),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( cC10(X1)
| ~ cC2(X1)
| ~ cC4(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
cC4(iV21081),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
cC2(iV21081),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ cC10(iV21081),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31])]),c_0_32]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 13:38:46 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.YcJrlfcQsw/E---3.1_8829.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 8910 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 8914 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 17
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 30
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 30
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 58
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 55
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of those cached : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 18
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 33
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 137
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1645
% 0.21/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 328
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------