TSTP Solution File: KRS152+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:39:04 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.60 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.69 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.22/0.69 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.69 % Transform :cnf
% 0.22/0.69 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.22/0.69 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 % Result :Theorem 0.030000s
% 0.22/0.69 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.030000s
% 0.22/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.69 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.69 % File : KRS152+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.22/0.69 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.22/0.69 % Problem : DL Test: k_ph ABox test from DL98 systems comparison
% 0.22/0.69 % Version : Especial.
% 0.22/0.69 % English :
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.22/0.69 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.22/0.69 % Source : [Bec03]
% 0.22/0.69 % Names : positive_description-logic-Manifest207 [Bec03]
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 % Status : Theorem
% 0.22/0.69 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0
% 0.22/0.69 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% 0.22/0.69 % Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% 0.22/0.69 % Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% 0.22/0.69 % Number of connectives : 29 ( 9 ~; 0 |; 12 &)
% 0.22/0.69 % ( 7 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.22/0.69 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% 0.22/0.69 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.22/0.69 % Number of predicates : 12 ( 12 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.22/0.69 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.22/0.69 % Number of variables : 12 ( 10 !; 2 ?)
% 0.22/0.69 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.22/0.69 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.22/0.69 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.22/0.69 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.69 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.22/0.69 fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.22/0.69 ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.69 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.22/0.69 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.22/0.69 fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.22/0.69 ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.69 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.22/0.69 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 %----Equality cC10
% 0.22/0.69 fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.22/0.69 ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.69 ( cC10(X)
% 0.22/0.69 <=> ( cC2(X)
% 0.22/0.69 & cC4(X) ) ) ).
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 %----Equality cC12
% 0.22/0.69 fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.22/0.69 ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.69 ( cC12(X)
% 0.22/0.69 <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.22/0.69 ( rR1(X,Y)
% 0.22/0.69 & cC10(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 %----Equality cC6
% 0.22/0.69 fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.22/0.69 ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.69 ( cC6(X)
% 0.22/0.69 <=> ( ~ cC2(X)
% 0.22/0.69 & cC4(X) ) ) ).
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 %----Equality cC8
% 0.22/0.69 fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.22/0.69 ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.69 ( cC8(X)
% 0.22/0.69 <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.22/0.69 ( rR1(X,Y)
% 0.22/0.69 & cC6(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.22/0.69
% 0.22/0.69 %----Equality cTEST
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.70 ( cTEST(X)
% 0.22/0.70 <=> ( cC12(X)
% 0.22/0.70 & ~ cC8(X) ) ) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21080
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_7,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 cTEST(iV21080) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21080
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_8,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 cowlThing(iV21080) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21080
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_9,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.70 ( rR1(iV21080,X)
% 0.22/0.70 => ~ cC6(X) ) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21080
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_10,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 ~ cC8(iV21080) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_11,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 rR1(iV21080,iV21081) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21081
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_12,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 ~ cC6(iV21081) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21081
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_13,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 cowlThing(iV21081) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21081
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_14,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 cC2(iV21081) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21081
% 0.22/0.70 fof(axiom_15,axiom,
% 0.22/0.70 cC4(iV21081) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.22/0.70 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21080
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21080
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21081
% 0.22/0.70 %----iV21081
% 0.22/0.70 fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
% 0.22/0.70 ( ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.70 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.22/0.70 & ~ cowlNothing(X) )
% 0.22/0.70 & ! [X] :
% 0.22/0.70 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.22/0.70 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) )
% 0.22/0.70 & cowlThing(iV21080)
% 0.22/0.70 & cC12(iV21080)
% 0.22/0.70 & cC10(iV21081)
% 0.22/0.70 & cowlThing(iV21081) ) ).
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.70 % Proof found
% 0.22/0.70 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.70 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.70 %ClaNum:27(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.22/0.70 %VarNum:46(SingletonVarNum:21)
% 0.22/0.70 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.22/0.70 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.22/0.70 %SharedTerms:17
% 0.22/0.70 %goalClause: 21 22
% 0.22/0.70 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.22/0.70 [2]P4(a1)
% 0.22/0.70 [3]P5(a2)
% 0.22/0.70 [4]P8(a2,a1)
% 0.22/0.70 [5]~P6(a1)
% 0.22/0.70 [6]~P7(a2)
% 0.22/0.70 [7]~P9(x71)
% 0.22/0.70 [8]P11(x81)+P10(x81)
% 0.22/0.70 [9]~P2(x91)+P1(x91)
% 0.22/0.70 [10]~P2(x101)+P4(x101)
% 0.22/0.70 [11]~P6(x111)+P4(x111)
% 0.22/0.70 [12]~P5(x121)+P3(x121)
% 0.22/0.70 [13]~P11(x131)+~P10(x131)
% 0.22/0.70 [14]~P6(x141)+~P1(x141)
% 0.22/0.70 [15]~P5(x151)+~P7(x151)
% 0.22/0.70 [23]~P6(x231)+~P8(a2,x231)
% 0.22/0.70 [18]~P3(x181)+P2(f3(x181))
% 0.22/0.70 [19]~P7(x191)+P6(f4(x191))
% 0.22/0.70 [24]~P3(x241)+P8(x241,f3(x241))
% 0.22/0.70 [25]~P7(x251)+P8(x251,f4(x251))
% 0.22/0.70 [16]P6(x161)+~P4(x161)+P1(x161)
% 0.22/0.70 [17]P5(x171)+~P3(x171)+P7(x171)
% 0.22/0.70 [20]~P1(x201)+~P4(x201)+P2(x201)
% 0.22/0.70 [26]~P8(x261,x262)+P3(x261)+~P2(x262)
% 0.22/0.70 [27]~P8(x271,x272)+P7(x271)+~P6(x272)
% 0.22/0.70 [21]P9(a5)+P10(a6)+~P11(a6)+~P2(a1)+~P3(a2)
% 0.22/0.70 [22]P9(a5)+P11(a6)+~P10(a6)+~P2(a1)+~P3(a2)
% 0.22/0.70 %EqnAxiom
% 0.22/0.70
% 0.22/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.70 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.22/0.70 (P2(a1)),
% 0.22/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,20])).
% 0.22/0.70 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.22/0.70 (P3(a2)),
% 0.22/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,20,12])).
% 0.22/0.70 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.22/0.70 (~P11(a6)+P10(a6)),
% 0.22/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,29,7,21])).
% 0.22/0.70 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.22/0.70 (~P10(a6)+P11(a6)),
% 0.22/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[28,29,7,22])).
% 0.22/0.70 cnf(47,plain,
% 0.22/0.70 (P10(a6)),
% 0.22/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[39,8])).
% 0.22/0.70 cnf(48,plain,
% 0.22/0.70 (P11(a6)),
% 0.22/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[47,40])).
% 0.22/0.70 cnf(49,plain,
% 0.22/0.70 (~P11(a6)),
% 0.22/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[47,13])).
% 0.22/0.70 cnf(51,plain,
% 0.22/0.70 ($false),
% 0.22/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[48,49]),
% 0.22/0.70 ['proof']).
% 0.22/0.70 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.70 % Total time :0.030000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------