TSTP Solution File: KRS150+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : KRS150+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS150+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 15:59:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.37 #
% 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 42 Number of unprocessed: 42
% 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37 # 42 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 9 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.37 # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37 # 33 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37 # 9 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 0.12/0.37 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.37 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.39 # There were 5 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.39 # There were 5 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.39 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.39 # There were 5 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.39 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.39 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.39 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.39 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (cTOP(iV16560))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (cTEST(iV16560))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (rR1(iV16560,iV16562))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (rR1(iV16560,iV16561))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_41, plain, (~cC10(iV16562))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_42, plain, (~cC2(iV16562))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (~cC2(iV16561))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~cC4(iV16561))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~cowlNothing(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (~xsd_integer(X1)|~xsd_string(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (~cC12(X1)|~cC10(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (~cC12(X1)|~cC2(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (~cC6(iV16561)|~cC18(iV16560)|~cC8(iV16560)|~cC16(iV16560)|~cC14(iV16560)|~cC12(iV16562)|~xsd_integer(esk6_0))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (~cC6(iV16561)|~cC18(iV16560)|~cC8(iV16560)|~cC16(iV16560)|~cC14(iV16560)|~cC12(iV16562)|~xsd_string(esk6_0))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (cC14(X1)|~cC16(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (cC16(X1)|~cC18(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (xsd_integer(X1)|xsd_string(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (cC8(X1)|~cC16(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (~cC6(X1)|~cC2(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_24, plain, (~cC6(X1)|~cC4(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (~cC2(esk1_1(X1))|~cC10(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (~cC4(X1)|~cC2(esk3_1(X1)))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (cC18(X1)|~cTEST(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (cC16(X1)|~cC8(X1)|~cC14(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (cTOP(X1)|~cC18(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (cC18(X1)|~cTOP(X1)|~cC16(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (cC12(esk2_1(X1))|~cC14(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (cTOP(X1)|~cTEST(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (cC6(esk4_1(X1))|~cC8(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (cC2(X1)|~rR1(iV16562,X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (cC2(X1)|~rR1(iV16561,X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (cTEST(X1)|~cC18(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (cC14(X1)|~cC12(X2)|~rR1(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (cC12(X1)|cC2(X1)|cC10(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (cC8(X1)|~cC6(X2)|~rR1(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_23, plain, (cC6(X1)|cC4(X1)|cC2(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (rR1(X1,esk2_1(X1))|~cC14(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (rR1(X1,esk4_1(X1))|~cC8(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (rR1(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~cC10(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (rR1(X1,esk3_1(X1))|~cC4(X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (cC2(X1)|cC10(X2)|~rR1(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (cC4(X1)|cC2(X2)|~rR1(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.39 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.39 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.39 # Found 16 steps
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (~cC6(iV16561)|~cC18(iV16560)|~cC8(iV16560)|~cC16(iV16560)|~cC14(iV16560)|~cC12(iV16562)|~xsd_string(esk6_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (~cC12(iV16562)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_529, plain, (cC2(iV16562)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_42])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_530, plain, (cC10(iV16562)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (~cC6(iV16561)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_871, plain, (cC4(iV16561)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_37])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_872, plain, (cC2(iV16561)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_40])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (~cC18(iV16560)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_896, plain, (~cTEST(iV16560)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (~cC8(iV16560)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_947, plain, (~rR1(iV16560,esk2_1(iV16560))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (~cC16(iV16560)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_50, ...])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (~cC14(iV16560)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_51, ...])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (~xsd_string(esk6_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_53, ...])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_946, plain, (~cC6(esk2_1(iV16560))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_946, ...])).
% 0.12/0.39 cnf(i_0_1165, plain, (~cC14(iV16560)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1165, ...])).
% 0.12/0.39 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.39 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.39 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.39 # Child (31270) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.39 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------