TSTP Solution File: KRS150+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS150+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : KRS150+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 02:39:04 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.74 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.74 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.74 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.74 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.74 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.74 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.74
% 0.20/0.74 % Result :Theorem 0.090000s
% 0.20/0.74 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.090000s
% 0.20/0.74 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.75 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.75 % File : KRS150+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.20/0.75 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.20/0.75 % Problem : DL Test: k_lin ABox test from DL98 systems comparison
% 0.20/0.75 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.75 % English :
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.75 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.20/0.75 % Source : [Bec03]
% 0.20/0.75 % Names : positive_description-logic-Manifest205 [Bec03]
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.75 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0
% 0.20/0.75 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.75 % Number of atoms : 59 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.75 % Maximal formula atoms : 13 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.75 % Number of connectives : 48 ( 14 ~; 0 |; 21 &)
% 0.20/0.75 % ( 11 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.75 % Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% 0.20/0.75 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.75 % Number of predicates : 16 ( 16 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.75 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.20/0.75 % Number of variables : 19 ( 15 !; 4 ?)
% 0.20/0.75 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.20/0.75 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.20/0.75 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.20/0.75 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.75 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.20/0.75 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cC10
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cC10(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( rR1(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.75 & ~ cC2(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cC12
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cC12(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ( ~ cC2(X)
% 0.20/0.75 & ~ cC10(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cC14
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cC14(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( rR1(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.75 & cC12(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cC16
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cC16(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ( cC14(X)
% 0.20/0.75 & cC8(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cC18
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cC18(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ( cTOP(X)
% 0.20/0.75 & cC16(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cC4
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_7,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cC4(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( rR1(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.75 & ~ cC2(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cC6
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_8,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cC6(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ( ~ cC2(X)
% 0.20/0.75 & ~ cC4(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cC8
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_9,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cC8(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( rR1(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.75 & cC6(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Equality cTEST
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_10,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( cTEST(X)
% 0.20/0.75 <=> ( cC18(X)
% 0.20/0.75 & cTOP(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16560
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_11,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 cTOP(iV16560) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16560
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_12,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 cTEST(iV16560) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16560
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_13,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 cowlThing(iV16560) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_14,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 rR1(iV16560,iV16562) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_15,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 rR1(iV16560,iV16561) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16561
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_16,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ~ cC4(iV16561) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16561
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_17,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 cowlThing(iV16561) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16561
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_18,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( rR1(iV16561,X)
% 0.20/0.75 => cC2(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16561
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_19,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ~ cC2(iV16561) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16562
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_20,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ~ cC10(iV16562) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16562
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_21,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ~ cC2(iV16562) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16562
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_22,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 cowlThing(iV16562) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16562
% 0.20/0.75 fof(axiom_23,axiom,
% 0.20/0.75 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.75 ( rR1(iV16562,X)
% 0.20/0.75 => cC2(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.75
% 0.20/0.75 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.20/0.75 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16560
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16560
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16560
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16560
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16560
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16561
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16561
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16562
% 0.20/0.75 %----iV16562
% 0.20/0.76 fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.76 ( ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.76 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.20/0.76 & ~ cowlNothing(X) )
% 0.20/0.76 & ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.76 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.20/0.76 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) )
% 0.20/0.76 & cC18(iV16560)
% 0.20/0.76 & cC16(iV16560)
% 0.20/0.76 & cowlThing(iV16560)
% 0.20/0.76 & cC14(iV16560)
% 0.20/0.76 & cC8(iV16560)
% 0.20/0.76 & cowlThing(iV16561)
% 0.20/0.76 & cC6(iV16561)
% 0.20/0.76 & cowlThing(iV16562)
% 0.20/0.76 & cC12(iV16562) ) ).
% 0.20/0.76
% 0.20/0.76 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.76 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.76 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.76 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.76 %ClaNum:42(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.76 %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 0.20/0.76 %MaxLitNum:9
% 0.20/0.76 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.76 %SharedTerms:24
% 0.20/0.76 %goalClause: 41 42
% 0.20/0.76 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.76 [2]P2(a1)
% 0.20/0.76 [3]P12(a1,a8)
% 0.20/0.76 [4]P12(a1,a9)
% 0.20/0.76 [5]~P3(a8)
% 0.20/0.76 [6]~P4(a8)
% 0.20/0.76 [7]~P4(a9)
% 0.20/0.76 [8]~P9(a9)
% 0.20/0.76 [9]~P13(x91)
% 0.20/0.76 [10]P15(x101)+P14(x101)
% 0.20/0.76 [11]~P7(x111)+P5(x111)
% 0.20/0.76 [12]~P8(x121)+P7(x121)
% 0.20/0.76 [13]~P7(x131)+P10(x131)
% 0.20/0.76 [14]~P2(x141)+P8(x141)
% 0.20/0.76 [15]~P8(x151)+P1(x151)
% 0.20/0.76 [16]~P2(x161)+P1(x161)
% 0.20/0.76 [19]~P15(x191)+~P14(x191)
% 0.20/0.76 [20]~P6(x201)+~P3(x201)
% 0.20/0.76 [21]~P6(x211)+~P4(x211)
% 0.20/0.76 [22]~P11(x221)+~P4(x221)
% 0.20/0.76 [23]~P11(x231)+~P9(x231)
% 0.20/0.76 [31]P4(x311)+~P12(a8,x311)
% 0.20/0.76 [32]P4(x321)+~P12(a9,x321)
% 0.20/0.76 [24]~P5(x241)+P6(f2(x241))
% 0.20/0.76 [25]~P10(x251)+P11(f4(x251))
% 0.20/0.76 [29]~P3(x291)+~P4(f3(x291))
% 0.20/0.76 [30]~P9(x301)+~P4(f5(x301))
% 0.20/0.76 [33]~P3(x331)+P12(x331,f3(x331))
% 0.20/0.76 [34]~P5(x341)+P12(x341,f2(x341))
% 0.20/0.76 [35]~P9(x351)+P12(x351,f5(x351))
% 0.20/0.76 [36]~P10(x361)+P12(x361,f4(x361))
% 0.20/0.76 [17]P4(x171)+P6(x171)+P3(x171)
% 0.20/0.76 [18]P9(x181)+P11(x181)+P4(x181)
% 0.20/0.76 [26]~P5(x261)+~P10(x261)+P7(x261)
% 0.20/0.76 [27]~P7(x271)+~P1(x271)+P8(x271)
% 0.20/0.76 [28]~P8(x281)+~P1(x281)+P2(x281)
% 0.20/0.76 [37]~P12(x371,x372)+P3(x371)+P4(x372)
% 0.20/0.76 [38]~P12(x382,x381)+P4(x381)+P9(x382)
% 0.20/0.76 [39]~P12(x391,x392)+P5(x391)+~P6(x392)
% 0.20/0.76 [40]~P12(x401,x402)+P10(x401)+~P11(x402)
% 0.20/0.76 [41]P13(a6)+P14(a7)+~P15(a7)+~P6(a8)+~P5(a1)+~P7(a1)+~P10(a1)+~P8(a1)+~P11(a9)
% 0.20/0.76 [42]P13(a6)+P15(a7)+~P14(a7)+~P6(a8)+~P5(a1)+~P7(a1)+~P10(a1)+~P8(a1)+~P11(a9)
% 0.20/0.76 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.76
% 0.20/0.76 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(49,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P8(a1)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,6,7,8,38,37,32,31,14])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(51,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P7(a1)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,6,7,8,38,37,32,31,14,12])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(53,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P5(a1)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,6,7,8,38,37,32,31,14,12,11])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(57,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P6(f2(a1))),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,6,7,8,38,37,32,31,14,12,11,34,24])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(61,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P6(a8)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,6,7,8,38,37,32,31,14,12,11,34,24,18,17])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(68,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (~P15(a7)+~P10(a1)+~P11(a9)+P14(a7)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[61,53,51,49,9,41])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(69,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (~P14(a7)+~P10(a1)+~P11(a9)+P15(a7)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[61,53,51,49,9,42])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(74,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P10(a1)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[57,51,21,20,13])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(84,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P11(a9)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,4,7,57,51,21,20,13,36,25,23,37,18])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(88,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P15(a7)+~P14(a7)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,4,7,57,51,21,20,13,36,25,23,37,18,38,69])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(109,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P14(a7)+~P15(a7)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[84,74,68])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(148,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (~P14(a7)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[88,19])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(149,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (~P15(a7)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[148,109])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(150,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 (P15(a7)),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[148,10])).
% 0.20/0.76 cnf(152,plain,
% 0.20/0.76 ($false),
% 0.20/0.76 inference(scs_inference,[],[149,150]),
% 0.20/0.76 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.76 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.76 % Total time :0.090000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------