TSTP Solution File: KRS148+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : KRS148+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.98s 1.16s
% Output : Refutation 0.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : KRS148+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 04:56:47 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36 Tue Jun 7 04:56:47 2022
% 0.19/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 32046.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.19/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.19/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 222 during input processing: 0 [] {-} cowlThing(iV5475).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 222 during input processing: 0 [] {-} cowlThing(iV5476).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 222 during input processing: 0 [] {-} cowlThing(iV5478).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 219
% 0.19/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 230
% 0.19/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 95
% 0.19/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 99
% 0.19/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 120
% 0.19/0.41 distinct predicate count: 77
% 0.19/0.41 distinct function count: 38
% 0.19/0.41 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.41
% 0.19/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.98/1.16 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.98/1.16 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 4 [ 1 1 1586 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 6 [ 3 0 2753 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 7 [ 4 0 520 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 8 [ 4 1 1042 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 9 [ 3 1 998 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 10 [ 4 0 1001 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.78 sec ----> 261 [hyper,258,2,257] {-} $F.
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 4.
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.98/1.16 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.98/1.16 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 1 [] {+} -cowlNothing(A).
% 0.98/1.16 2 [] {+} -xsd_string(A)| -xsd_integer(A).
% 0.98/1.16 71 [] {+} -cC140(A)|cC138(A).
% 0.98/1.16 205 [] {+} -cTEST(A)|cC140(A).
% 0.98/1.16 206 [] {+} -cTEST(A)|cC116(A).
% 0.98/1.16 218 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cC138(iV5475)| -cowlThing(iV5475)| -cC116(iV5475)| -cC140(iV5475).
% 0.98/1.16 219 [copy,218,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cC138(iV5475)| -cowlThing(iV5475)| -cC116(iV5475)| -cC140(iV5475).
% 0.98/1.16 220 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cC138(iV5475)| -cowlThing(iV5475)| -cC116(iV5475)| -cC140(iV5475).
% 0.98/1.16 221 [copy,220,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cC138(iV5475)| -cowlThing(iV5475)| -cC116(iV5475)| -cC140(iV5475).
% 0.98/1.16 222 [] {+} cowlThing(A).
% 0.98/1.16 223 [] {+} xsd_string(A)|xsd_integer(A).
% 0.98/1.16 229 [] {+} cTEST(iV5475).
% 0.98/1.16 233 [hyper,229,206] {+} cC116(iV5475).
% 0.98/1.16 234 [hyper,229,205] {-} cC140(iV5475).
% 0.98/1.16 235 [hyper,234,71] {+} cC138(iV5475).
% 0.98/1.16 257 [hyper,233,221,222,223,235,222,234,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.98/1.16 258 [hyper,257,219,222,235,222,233,234] {+} xsd_string($c2).
% 0.98/1.16 261 [hyper,258,2,257] {-} $F.
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.98/1.16 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 ============ end of search ============
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 true clauses given 2 (16.7%)
% 0.98/1.16 false clauses given 10
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 FALSE TRUE
% 0.98/1.16 3 0 1
% 0.98/1.16 4 1 19
% 0.98/1.16 6 3 1
% 0.98/1.16 7 0 1
% 0.98/1.16 8 0 1
% 0.98/1.16 tot: 4 23 (85.2% true)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Model 10 [ 4 0 1001 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.98/1.16
% 0.98/1.16 Process 32046 finished Tue Jun 7 04:56:48 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------