TSTP Solution File: KRS143+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : KRS143+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:30:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.36s
% Output   : Refutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.10  % Problem  : KRS143+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.10  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.10/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.29  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 05:22:35 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.14/0.36  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.14/0.36  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.36  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.14/0.36  SPASS derived 17 clauses, backtracked 13 clauses, performed 4 splits and kept 32 clauses.
% 0.14/0.36  SPASS allocated 97731 KBytes.
% 0.14/0.36  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.14/0.36  		0:00:00.02 for the input.
% 0.14/0.36  		0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.14/0.36  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.14/0.36  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.14/0.36  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  
% 0.14/0.36  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 42 :
% 0.14/0.36  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.14/0.36  1[0:Inp] ||  -> cowlThing(u)*.
% 0.14/0.36  2[0:Inp] cowlNothing(u) ||  -> .
% 0.14/0.36  3[0:Inp] ||  -> xsd_string(u)* xsd_integer(u).
% 0.14/0.36  4[0:Inp] || xsd_integer(skc11) -> xsd_string(skc11)* SkC0.
% 0.14/0.36  5[0:Inp] || xsd_string(skc11)* -> xsd_integer(skc11) SkC0.
% 0.14/0.36  6[0:Inp] xsd_integer(u) xsd_string(u) ||  -> .
% 0.14/0.36  7[0:Inp] cc(u) ||  -> rp(u,skf2(u))*.
% 0.14/0.36  8[0:Inp] || cowlThing(skc6) SkC0 -> cc(skc8) cowlNothing(skc7)*.
% 0.14/0.36  9[0:Inp] || rp(skc8,u)* cowlThing(skc6) SkC0 -> rp(skc8,skc10)* cowlNothing(skc7).
% 0.14/0.36  10[0:Inp] || rp(skc8,u)* cowlThing(skc6) SkC0 -> rp(skc8,skc9)* cowlNothing(skc7).
% 0.14/0.36  11[0:Inp] cc(u) || rp(u,v)*+ rp(u,w)* -> equal(w,v)*.
% 0.14/0.36  12[0:Inp] || equal(skc10,skc9) rp(skc8,u)* cowlThing(skc6) SkC0 -> cowlNothing(skc7).
% 0.14/0.36  13[0:MRR:5.0,3.1] ||  -> SkC0 xsd_integer(skc11)*.
% 0.14/0.36  14[0:MRR:4.0,13.0] ||  -> SkC0 xsd_string(skc11)*.
% 0.14/0.36  15[0:MRR:8.0,8.3,1.0,2.0] || SkC0 -> cc(skc8)*.
% 0.14/0.36  16[0:MRR:10.1,10.4,1.0,2.0] || SkC0 rp(skc8,u)* -> rp(skc8,skc9)*.
% 0.14/0.36  17[0:MRR:9.1,9.4,1.0,2.0] || SkC0 rp(skc8,u)* -> rp(skc8,skc10)*.
% 0.14/0.36  18[0:MRR:12.2,12.4,1.0,2.0] || SkC0 rp(skc8,u)* equal(skc10,skc9) -> .
% 0.14/0.36  19[1:Spt:13.0] ||  -> SkC0*.
% 0.14/0.36  20[1:MRR:15.0,19.0] ||  -> cc(skc8)*.
% 0.14/0.36  21[1:MRR:16.0,19.0] || rp(skc8,u)*+ -> rp(skc8,skc9)*.
% 0.14/0.36  22[1:MRR:17.0,19.0] || rp(skc8,u)*+ -> rp(skc8,skc10)*.
% 0.14/0.36  23[1:MRR:18.0,19.0] || rp(skc8,u)* equal(skc10,skc9) -> .
% 0.14/0.36  24[2:Spt:21.1] ||  -> rp(skc8,skc9)*.
% 0.14/0.36  25[3:Spt:22.0] || rp(skc8,u)* -> .
% 0.14/0.36  26[3:UnC:25.0,24.0] ||  -> .
% 0.14/0.36  27[3:Spt:26.0,22.1] ||  -> rp(skc8,skc10)*.
% 0.14/0.36  28[4:Spt:23.0] || rp(skc8,u)* -> .
% 0.14/0.36  29[4:UnC:28.0,27.0] ||  -> .
% 0.14/0.36  30[4:Spt:29.0,23.1] || equal(skc10,skc9)** -> .
% 0.14/0.36  31[2:Res:24.0,11.1] cc(skc8) || rp(skc8,u)* -> equal(u,skc9).
% 0.14/0.36  34[2:SSi:31.0,20.0] || rp(skc8,u)* -> equal(u,skc9).
% 0.14/0.36  38[3:Res:27.0,34.0] ||  -> equal(skc10,skc9)**.
% 0.14/0.36  40[4:MRR:38.0,30.0] ||  -> .
% 0.14/0.36  42[2:Spt:40.0,21.1,24.0] || rp(skc8,skc9)* -> .
% 0.14/0.36  43[2:Spt:40.0,21.0] || rp(skc8,u)* -> .
% 0.14/0.36  44[2:Res:7.1,43.0] cc(skc8) ||  -> .
% 0.14/0.36  45[2:SSi:44.0,20.0] ||  -> .
% 0.14/0.36  46[1:Spt:45.0,13.0,19.0] || SkC0* -> .
% 0.14/0.36  47[1:Spt:45.0,13.1] ||  -> xsd_integer(skc11)*.
% 0.14/0.36  48[1:MRR:14.0,46.0] ||  -> xsd_string(skc11)*.
% 0.14/0.36  50[1:EmS:6.0,6.1,47.0,48.0] ||  -> .
% 0.14/0.36  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.14/0.36  Formulae used in the proof : axiom_0 axiom_1 the_axiom axiom_2 axiom_3
% 0.14/0.36  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------