TSTP Solution File: KRS141+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : KRS141+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.37s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS141+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 13:40:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Tue Jun 7 13:40:36 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11058.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} cowlThing(ii).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} cowlThing(io).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.20/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.20/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 55
% 0.20/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.20/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.20/0.40 distinct predicate count: 7
% 0.20/0.40 distinct function count: 0
% 0.20/0.40 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.37/0.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Model 5 [ 1 1 89 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Model 6 [ 1 0 46 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.19 sec ----> 15 [hyper,14,2,13] {-} $F.
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.37/0.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 1 [] {+} -cowlNothing(A).
% 0.37/0.58 2 [] {+} -xsd_string(A)| -xsd_integer(A).
% 0.37/0.58 3 [] {+} -cr(A)| -rp(A,B)|cc(B).
% 0.37/0.58 4 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cc(io)| -cowlThing(io).
% 0.37/0.58 5 [copy,4,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)|xsd_string($c2)| -xsd_integer($c2)| -cc(io)| -cowlThing(io).
% 0.37/0.58 6 [] {-} -cowlThing($c1)|cowlNothing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cc(io)| -cowlThing(io).
% 0.37/0.58 7 [copy,6,unit_del,1] {+} -cowlThing($c1)| -xsd_string($c2)|xsd_integer($c2)| -cc(io)| -cowlThing(io).
% 0.37/0.58 8 [] {+} cowlThing(A).
% 0.37/0.58 9 [] {+} xsd_string(A)|xsd_integer(A).
% 0.37/0.58 10 [] {+} cr(ii).
% 0.37/0.58 11 [] {+} rp(ii,io).
% 0.37/0.58 12 [hyper,10,3,11] {+} cc(io).
% 0.37/0.58 13 [hyper,12,7,8,9,8,factor_simp] {+} xsd_integer($c2).
% 0.37/0.58 14 [hyper,13,5,8,12,8] {+} xsd_string($c2).
% 0.37/0.58 15 [hyper,14,2,13] {-} $F.
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.37/0.58 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 ============ end of search ============
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 true clauses given 2 (28.6%)
% 0.37/0.58 false clauses given 5
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 FALSE TRUE
% 0.37/0.58 tot: 0 0 (-nan% true)
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Model 6 [ 1 0 46 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 Process 11058 finished Tue Jun 7 13:40:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------