TSTP Solution File: KRS140+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : KRS140+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:25:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.69s 1.02s
% Output   : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KRS140+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 15:01:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.69/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.69/0.98  Process 3564 was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.69/0.98  Tue Jun  7 15:01:52 2022
% 0.69/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_3411_n021.cluster.edu".
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_3411_n021.cluster.edu
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.69/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.69/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.69/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.69/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.69/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.69/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.69/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.69/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.69/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (15 formulas)
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.69/0.98  1 (all A all B (A = B & cowlNothing(A) -> cowlNothing(B))) # label(cowlNothing_substitution_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  2 (all A all B (A = B & cowlThing(A) -> cowlThing(B))) # label(cowlThing_substitution_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  3 (all A all B all C (A = B & rsymProp(A,C) -> rsymProp(B,C))) # label(rsymProp_substitution_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  4 (all A all B all C (A = B & rsymProp(C,A) -> rsymProp(C,B))) # label(rsymProp_substitution_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  5 (all A all B (A = B & xsd_integer(A) -> xsd_integer(B))) # label(xsd_integer_substitution_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  6 (all A all B (A = B & xsd_string(A) -> xsd_string(B))) # label(xsd_string_substitution_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  7 (all X (cowlThing(X) & -cowlNothing(X))) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  8 (all X (xsd_string(X) <-> -xsd_integer(X))) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  9 (all X all Y (rsymProp(X,Y) -> Y = ia | Y = ib)) # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  10 (all X all Y (rsymProp(X,Y) -> rsymProp(Y,X))) # label(axiom_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  11 -((all X (cowlThing(X) & -cowlNothing(X))) & (all X (xsd_string(X) <-> -xsd_integer(X))) & (all X all Y all Z (rsymProp(X,Y) & rsymProp(Y,Z) -> rsymProp(X,Z))) & (exists X (rsymProp(ia,X) & cowlThing(X)))) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.69/0.98  
% 0.69/0.98  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.69/1.02  Function symbol KB weights:  ia=1. ib=1. c1=1. c2=1. c3=1. c4=1. c5=1.
% 0.69/1.02  
% 0.69/1.02  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.69/1.02  
% 0.69/1.02  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.69/1.02  
% 0.69/1.02  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.69/1.02  
% 0.69/1.02  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.69/1.02  
% 0.69/1.02  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.69/1.02  
% 0.69/1.02  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.69/1.02  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.69/1.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/1.02  
% 0.69/1.02  % Proof 1 at 0.05 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.69/1.02  % Length of proof is 117.
% 0.69/1.02  % Level of proof is 40.
% 0.69/1.02  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.69/1.02  % Given clauses 288.
% 0.69/1.02  
% 0.69/1.02  3 (all A all B all C (A = B & rsymProp(A,C) -> rsymProp(B,C))) # label(rsymProp_substitution_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  4 (all A all B all C (A = B & rsymProp(C,A) -> rsymProp(C,B))) # label(rsymProp_substitution_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  7 (all X (cowlThing(X) & -cowlNothing(X))) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  8 (all X (xsd_string(X) <-> -xsd_integer(X))) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  9 (all X all Y (rsymProp(X,Y) -> Y = ia | Y = ib)) # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  10 (all X all Y (rsymProp(X,Y) -> rsymProp(Y,X))) # label(axiom_3) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  11 -((all X (cowlThing(X) & -cowlNothing(X))) & (all X (xsd_string(X) <-> -xsd_integer(X))) & (all X all Y all Z (rsymProp(X,Y) & rsymProp(Y,Z) -> rsymProp(X,Z))) & (exists X (rsymProp(ia,X) & cowlThing(X)))) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  12 cowlThing(A) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 0.69/1.02  13 rsymProp(ia,ia) # label(axiom_5) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  14 rsymProp(ib,ib) # label(axiom_7) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.02  15 xsd_string(A) | xsd_integer(A) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 0.69/1.02  16 -cowlNothing(A) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(7)].
% 0.69/1.02  17 -xsd_string(A) | -xsd_integer(A) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(8)].
% 0.69/1.02  18 -rsymProp(A,B) | rsymProp(B,A) # label(axiom_3) # label(axiom).  [clausify(10)].
% 0.69/1.02  23 A != B | -rsymProp(B,C) | rsymProp(A,C) # label(rsymProp_substitution_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.69/1.02  24 A != B | -rsymProp(C,B) | rsymProp(C,A) # label(rsymProp_substitution_2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.69/1.02  25 -rsymProp(A,B) | ia = B | ib = B # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(9)].
% 0.69/1.02  26 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4) | -rsymProp(ia,A) | -cowlThing(A) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.69/1.02  27 xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4) | -rsymProp(ia,A).  [copy(26),unit_del(a,12),unit_del(b,16),unit_del(g,12)].
% 0.69/1.02  28 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5) | -rsymProp(ia,A) | -cowlThing(A) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.69/1.02  29 xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5) | -rsymProp(ia,A).  [copy(28),unit_del(a,12),unit_del(b,16),unit_del(g,12)].
% 0.69/1.02  30 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,c5) | -rsymProp(ia,A) | -cowlThing(A) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.69/1.02  31 xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,c5) | -rsymProp(ia,A).  [copy(30),unit_del(a,12),unit_del(b,16),unit_del(g,12)].
% 0.69/1.02  32 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4) | -rsymProp(ia,A) | -cowlThing(A) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.69/1.02  33 -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4) | -rsymProp(ia,A).  [copy(32),unit_del(a,12),unit_del(b,16),unit_del(g,12)].
% 0.69/1.02  34 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5) | -rsymProp(ia,A) | -cowlThing(A) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.69/1.02  35 -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5) | -rsymProp(ia,A).  [copy(34),unit_del(a,12),unit_del(b,16),unit_del(g,12)].
% 0.69/1.02  36 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,c5) | -rsymProp(ia,A) | -cowlThing(A) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(11)].
% 0.69/1.02  37 -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,c5) | -rsymProp(ia,A).  [copy(36),unit_del(a,12),unit_del(b,16),unit_del(g,12)].
% 0.69/1.02  43 xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4).  [resolve(27,d,13,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  44 xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5).  [resolve(29,d,13,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  45 xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,c5).  [resolve(31,d,13,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  46 -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4).  [resolve(33,d,13,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  47 -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5).  [resolve(35,d,13,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  48 -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,c5).  [resolve(37,d,13,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  49 xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4).  [resolve(46,a,15,a),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.02  50 xsd_integer(c2) | c4 = ia | c4 = ib.  [resolve(49,b,25,a),flip(b),flip(c)].
% 0.69/1.02  51 xsd_integer(c2) | c4 != A | rsymProp(c3,A).  [resolve(49,b,24,b),flip(b)].
% 0.69/1.02  52 xsd_integer(c2) | c3 != A | rsymProp(A,c4).  [resolve(49,b,23,b),flip(b)].
% 0.69/1.02  53 xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c3).  [resolve(49,b,18,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  54 xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5).  [resolve(47,a,15,a),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.02  55 xsd_integer(c2) | c3 = ia | c3 = ib.  [resolve(53,b,25,a),flip(b),flip(c)].
% 0.69/1.02  58 xsd_integer(c2) | c5 = ia | c5 = ib.  [resolve(54,b,25,a),flip(b),flip(c)].
% 0.69/1.02  60 xsd_integer(c2) | c4 != A | rsymProp(A,c5).  [resolve(54,b,23,b),flip(b)].
% 0.69/1.02  65 c4 = ia | c4 = ib | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4).  [resolve(50,a,43,b)].
% 0.69/1.02  68 c3 = ia | c3 = ib | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4).  [resolve(55,a,43,b)].
% 0.69/1.02  70 c5 = ia | c5 = ib | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5).  [resolve(58,a,44,b)].
% 0.69/1.02  77 c4 = ia | c4 = ib | xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(65,d,25,a),flip(d),flip(e),merge(d),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.02  79 c4 = ia | c4 = ib | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(77,c,17,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  82 c4 = ia | c4 = ib.  [resolve(79,c,50,a),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.02  88 c4 = ia | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(ib,c5).  [resolve(82,b,60,b)].
% 0.69/1.02  90 c4 = ia | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(c3,ib).  [resolve(82,b,51,b)].
% 0.69/1.02  108 c3 = ia | c3 = ib | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c3).  [resolve(68,d,18,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  116 c5 = ia | c5 = ib | xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(70,d,25,a),flip(d),flip(e),merge(d),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.02  118 c5 = ia | c5 = ib | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(116,c,17,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  119 c5 = ia | c5 = ib.  [resolve(118,c,58,a),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.02  126 c5 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,ib).  [para(119(b,1),45(c,2))].
% 0.69/1.02  127 c5 = ia | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,ib).  [para(119(b,1),48(c,2))].
% 0.69/1.02  163 c5 = ia | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | c4 = ia.  [resolve(127,d,90,c),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.02  169 c5 = ia | xsd_integer(c2) | c4 = ia.  [resolve(163,b,15,a),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.02  170 c5 = ia | c4 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4).  [resolve(169,b,43,b)].
% 0.69/1.02  175 c3 = ia | c3 = ib | xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(108,d,25,a),flip(d),flip(e),merge(d),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.02  177 c3 = ia | c3 = ib | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(175,c,17,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  179 c3 = ia | c3 = ib.  [resolve(177,c,55,a),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.02  181 c3 = ia | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(ib,c4).  [resolve(179,b,52,b)].
% 0.69/1.02  195 c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(ib,c5).  [para(179(b,1),45(c,1))].
% 0.69/1.02  196 c3 = ia | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(ib,c5).  [para(179(b,1),48(c,1))].
% 0.69/1.02  199 c3 = ia | c5 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [para(179(b,1),126(d,1)),unit_del(e,14)].
% 0.69/1.02  200 c3 = ia | c5 = ia | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2).  [para(179(b,1),127(d,1)),unit_del(e,14)].
% 0.69/1.02  210 c3 = ia | xsd_integer(c2) | c4 != A | rsymProp(ib,A).  [resolve(181,c,24,b),flip(c)].
% 0.69/1.02  226 c3 = ia | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | c4 = ia.  [resolve(196,d,88,c),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.02  228 c3 = ia | c5 = ia | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(200,c,15,a),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.02  229 c3 = ia | c5 = ia | xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(228,c,199,d),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.02  232 c3 = ia | c5 = ia | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(229,c,17,a)].
% 0.69/1.02  233 c3 = ia | c5 = ia.  [resolve(232,c,228,c),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.02  242 c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,ia).  [para(233(b,1),45(c,2))].
% 0.69/1.03  249 c3 = ia | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(ib,ia).  [para(233(b,1),196(d,2)),merge(b)].
% 0.69/1.03  265 c3 = ia | xsd_integer(c2) | c4 = ia.  [resolve(226,b,15,a),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.03  266 c3 = ia | c4 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c4,c5).  [resolve(265,b,44,b)].
% 0.69/1.03  271 c4 = ia | c5 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c3,ib).  [para(82(b,1),170(d,2)),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.03  278 c4 = ia | c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(ib,c5).  [para(82(b,1),266(d,1)),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.03  283 c4 = ia | c5 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(271,d,126,d),merge(d),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.03  286 c4 = ia | c5 = ia | xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(283,d,169,b),merge(d),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.03  288 c4 = ia | c5 = ia | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(286,c,17,a)].
% 0.69/1.03  289 c4 = ia | c5 = ia.  [resolve(288,c,169,b),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.03  298 c4 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,ia).  [para(289(b,1),45(c,2))].
% 0.69/1.03  299 c4 = ia | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(c3,ia).  [para(289(b,1),48(c,2))].
% 0.69/1.03  326 c4 = ia | c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(278,d,195,d),merge(d),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.03  329 c4 = ia | c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(326,d,265,b),merge(d),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.03  331 c4 = ia | c3 = ia | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(329,c,17,a)].
% 0.69/1.03  332 c4 = ia | c3 = ia.  [resolve(331,c,265,b),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.03  333 c3 = ia | xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(ib,ia).  [resolve(332,a,210,c),merge(b)].
% 0.69/1.03  363 c3 = ia | xsd_integer(c2) | -xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(333,c,249,d),merge(c),merge(e)].
% 0.69/1.03  365 c3 = ia | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(363,c,15,a),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.03  366 c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c3,c4).  [resolve(365,b,43,b)].
% 0.69/1.03  372 c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(c3,ia).  [para(332(a,1),366(c,2)),merge(b)].
% 0.69/1.03  380 c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(372,c,242,d),merge(c),merge(d)].
% 0.69/1.03  383 c3 = ia | xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(380,c,365,b),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.03  385 c3 = ia | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(383,b,17,a)].
% 0.69/1.03  386 c3 = ia.  [resolve(385,b,365,b),merge(b)].
% 0.69/1.03  387 c4 = ia | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2).  [back_rewrite(299),rewrite([386(8)]),unit_del(d,13)].
% 0.69/1.03  388 c4 = ia | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [back_rewrite(298),rewrite([386(8)]),unit_del(d,13)].
% 0.69/1.03  397 -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(ia,c5).  [back_rewrite(48),rewrite([386(5)])].
% 0.69/1.03  398 xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -rsymProp(ia,c5).  [back_rewrite(45),rewrite([386(5)])].
% 0.69/1.03  400 c4 = ia | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(387,b,15,a),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.03  403 c4 = ia | xsd_string(c2).  [resolve(388,c,400,b),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.03  405 c4 = ia | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(403,b,17,a)].
% 0.69/1.03  406 c4 = ia.  [resolve(405,b,400,b),merge(b)].
% 0.69/1.03  418 xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(ia,c5).  [back_rewrite(54),rewrite([406(3)])].
% 0.69/1.03  419 xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rsymProp(ia,c5).  [back_rewrite(44),rewrite([406(5)])].
% 0.69/1.03  420 -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(397,c,418,b),merge(c)].
% 0.69/1.03  421 xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(420,a,15,a),merge(b)].
% 0.69/1.03  422 xsd_string(c2) | rsymProp(ia,c5).  [back_unit_del(419),unit_del(b,421)].
% 0.69/1.03  423 xsd_string(c2) | -rsymProp(ia,c5).  [back_unit_del(398),unit_del(b,421)].
% 0.69/1.03  426 -xsd_string(c2).  [ur(17,b,421,a)].
% 0.69/1.03  428 -rsymProp(ia,c5).  [back_unit_del(423),unit_del(a,426)].
% 0.69/1.03  429 $F.  [back_unit_del(422),unit_del(a,426),unit_del(b,428)].
% 0.69/1.03  
% 0.69/1.03  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.69/1.03  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.69/1.03  
% 0.69/1.03  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.69/1.03  
% 0.69/1.03  Given=288. Generated=1192. Kept=409. proofs=1.
% 0.69/1.03  Usable=37. Sos=1. Demods=2. Limbo=3, Disabled=390. Hints=0.
% 0.69/1.03  Megabytes=0.25.
% 0.69/1.03  User_CPU=0.06, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.69/1.03  
% 0.69/1.03  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.69/1.03  
% 0.69/1.03  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.69/1.03  
% 0.69/1.03  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.69/1.03  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.69/1.03  
% 0.69/1.03  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.69/1.03  
% 0.69/1.03  Process 3564 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jun  7 15:01:52 2022
% 0.69/1.03  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------