TSTP Solution File: KRS137+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS137+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS137+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:30:27 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.64 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.64
% 0.19/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.19/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.19/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 % File : KRS137+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.19/0.65 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.19/0.65 % Problem : A variation of equivalentClass-001
% 0.19/0.65 % Version : Especial.
% 0.19/0.65 % English : This is a variation of equivalentClass-001, showing the use of
% 0.19/0.65 % owl:Ontology triples in the premises and conclusions.
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.65 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.19/0.65 % Source : [Bec03]
% 0.19/0.65 % Names : positive_Ontology-Manifest001 [Bec03]
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Status : Theorem
% 0.19/0.65 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.19/0.65 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% 0.19/0.65 % Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of connectives : 14 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 7 &)
% 0.19/0.65 % ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.65 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of variables : 5 ( 5 !; 0 ?)
% 0.19/0.65 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.19/0.65 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.19/0.65 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.19/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.19/0.65 fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.19/0.65 ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.65 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.19/0.65 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.19/0.65 fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.65 ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.65 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.19/0.65 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %----Equality cCar
% 0.19/0.65 fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.65 ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.65 ( cCar(X)
% 0.19/0.65 <=> cAutomobile(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %----iauto
% 0.19/0.65 fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.19/0.65 cowlThing(iauto) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %----iauto
% 0.19/0.65 fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.19/0.65 cAutomobile(iauto) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %----icar
% 0.19/0.65 fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.19/0.65 cowlThing(icar) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %----icar
% 0.19/0.65 fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.19/0.65 cCar(icar) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.19/0.65 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.19/0.65 %----iauto
% 0.19/0.65 %----iauto
% 0.19/0.65 %----icar
% 0.19/0.65 %----icar
% 0.19/0.65 fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.65 ( ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.65 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.19/0.65 & ~ cowlNothing(X) )
% 0.19/0.65 & ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.65 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.19/0.65 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) )
% 0.19/0.65 & cCar(iauto)
% 0.19/0.65 & cowlThing(iauto)
% 0.19/0.65 & cowlThing(icar)
% 0.19/0.65 & cAutomobile(icar) ) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.65 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.65 %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.65 %VarNum:9(SingletonVarNum:5)
% 0.19/0.65 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.19/0.65 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.65 %SharedTerms:13
% 0.19/0.65 %goalClause: 8 9
% 0.19/0.65 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.65 [2]P2(a2)
% 0.19/0.65 [3]~P3(x31)
% 0.19/0.65 [4]P5(x41)+P4(x41)
% 0.19/0.65 [5]~P2(x51)+P1(x51)
% 0.19/0.65 [6]~P1(x61)+P2(x61)
% 0.19/0.65 [7]~P5(x71)+~P4(x71)
% 0.19/0.65 [8]P3(a3)+P4(a4)+~P5(a4)+~P1(a2)+~P2(a1)
% 0.19/0.65 [9]P3(a3)+P5(a4)+~P4(a4)+~P1(a2)+~P2(a1)
% 0.19/0.65 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(10,plain,
% 0.19/0.65 (P2(a1)),
% 0.19/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6])).
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.19/0.65 (P1(a2)),
% 0.19/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6,5])).
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.65 (~P5(a4)+P4(a4)),
% 0.19/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,10,3,8])).
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(13,plain,
% 0.19/0.65 (~P4(a4)+P5(a4)),
% 0.19/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,10,3,9])).
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.65 (P5(a4)),
% 0.19/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,13])).
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(18,plain,
% 0.19/0.65 (P4(a4)),
% 0.19/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,12])).
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.19/0.65 (~P4(a4)),
% 0.19/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,7])).
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.65 ($false),
% 0.19/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,19]),
% 0.19/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.65 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------