TSTP Solution File: KRS135+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : KRS135+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : KRS135+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 18:28:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.38  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.38  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.21/0.38  #
% 0.21/0.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.38  # Number of axioms: 8 Number of unprocessed: 8
% 0.21/0.38  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.21/0.38  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.21/0.38  # Hello from C++
% 0.21/0.38  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.21/0.38  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.21/0.38  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.21/0.38  # 8 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.21/0.38  # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.21/0.38  # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.21/0.38  # Found 1 unit axioms.
% 0.21/0.38  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.21/0.38  # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.21/0.38  # 7 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.21/0.38  # 1 unit axiom clauses
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.21/0.38  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 4 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 4 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.21/0.38  # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.21/0.38  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.21/0.38  
% 0.21/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.21/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~cowlNothing(X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (xsd_string(esk2_0)|~cA(esk4_0)|~xsd_integer(esk2_0))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (xsd_integer(esk2_0)|~cA(esk4_0)|~xsd_string(esk2_0))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, negated_conjecture, (rprop(esk3_0,esk4_0)|xsd_string(esk2_0)|~xsd_integer(esk2_0))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (rprop(esk3_0,esk4_0)|xsd_integer(esk2_0)|~xsd_string(esk2_0))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (xsd_integer(X1)|xsd_string(X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (cA(X1)|~rprop(X2,X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (~xsd_integer(X1)|~xsd_string(X1))).
% 0.21/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.21/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.21/0.38  # Found 7 steps
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (xsd_string(esk2_0)|~cA(esk4_0)|~xsd_integer(esk2_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~cA(esk4_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_205, plain, (~rprop(esk3_0,esk4_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (xsd_string(esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_19, ...])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (~xsd_integer(esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_21, ...])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_263, plain, (xsd_integer(esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_263, ...])).
% 0.21/0.38  cnf(i_0_264, plain, (~xsd_string(esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_264, ...])).
% 0.21/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.21/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.21/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.21/0.38  # Returning from population with 4 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.21/0.38  # We now have 4 tableaux to operate on
% 0.21/0.38  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.21/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.21/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------