TSTP Solution File: KRS134+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : KRS134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:25:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s 0.98s
% Output   : Refutation 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : KRS134+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 12:19:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.44/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.44/0.98  Process 7302 was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.44/0.98  Tue Jun  7 12:19:55 2022
% 0.44/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_7149_n019.cluster.edu".
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_7149_n019.cluster.edu
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.44/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.44/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.44/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.44/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.44/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.44/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.44/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.44/0.98  1 (all X (cowlThing(X) & -cowlNothing(X))) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  2 (all X (xsd_string(X) <-> -xsd_integer(X))) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  3 (all X all Y (rprop(X,Y) -> cA(Y))) # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  4 -((all X (cowlThing(X) & -cowlNothing(X))) & (all X (xsd_string(X) <-> -xsd_integer(X))) & (all X (cowlThing(X) -> (all Y (rprop(X,Y) -> cA(Y)))))) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.44/0.98  5 -xsd_string(A) | -xsd_integer(A) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  6 xsd_string(A) | xsd_integer(A) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  7 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | cowlThing(c3) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | cowlThing(c3) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(7,c,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  8 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(8,c,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  9 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | cowlThing(c3) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | cowlThing(c3) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(9,c,6,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  10 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(10,c,6,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  11 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(11,c,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  12 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(12,c,6,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  13 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | cowlThing(c3) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(7,c,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  14 -cowlNothing(A) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | cowlThing(c3) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(13,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  15 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(8,c,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(15,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  16 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | cowlThing(c3) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(9,c,6,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | cowlThing(c3) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(16,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  17 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(10,c,6,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(17,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  18 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(11,c,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(18,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  19 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(12,c,6,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(19,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  20 -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(18,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  21 -rprop(A,B) | cA(B) # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | cA(c4).  [resolve(20,c,21,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  22 -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(19,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | cA(c4).  [resolve(22,c,21,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  23 -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | cA(c4).  [resolve(20,c,21,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  24 -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(15,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  25 -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(17,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(23,d,24,c)].
% 0.44/0.98  26 -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | cA(c4).  [resolve(22,c,21,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  Derived: -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(26,d,25,c)].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.44/0.98  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. c2=1. c3=1.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.44/0.98  % Length of proof is 27.
% 0.44/0.98  % Level of proof is 7.
% 0.44/0.98  % Maximum clause weight is 2.000.
% 0.44/0.98  % Given clauses 0.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  1 (all X (cowlThing(X) & -cowlNothing(X))) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  2 (all X (xsd_string(X) <-> -xsd_integer(X))) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  3 (all X all Y (rprop(X,Y) -> cA(Y))) # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  4 -((all X (cowlThing(X) & -cowlNothing(X))) & (all X (xsd_string(X) <-> -xsd_integer(X))) & (all X (cowlThing(X) -> (all Y (rprop(X,Y) -> cA(Y)))))) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.44/0.98  5 -xsd_string(A) | -xsd_integer(A) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  6 xsd_string(A) | xsd_integer(A) # label(axiom_1) # label(axiom).  [clausify(2)].
% 0.44/0.98  8 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  10 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  11 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_string(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  12 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_string(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) # label(the_axiom) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(4)].
% 0.44/0.98  14 -cowlNothing(A) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98  15 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(8,c,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  17 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(10,c,6,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  18 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(11,c,5,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  19 -cowlThing(c1) | cowlNothing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(12,c,6,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  20 -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(18,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  21 -rprop(A,B) | cA(B) # label(axiom_2) # label(axiom).  [clausify(3)].
% 0.44/0.98  22 -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | rprop(c3,c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(19,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  23 -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | cA(c4).  [resolve(20,c,21,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  24 -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(15,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  25 -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cA(c4) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(17,b,14,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  26 -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | cA(c4).  [resolve(22,c,21,a)].
% 0.44/0.98  27 cowlThing(A) # label(axiom_0) # label(axiom).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.44/0.98  30 -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -cowlThing(c1) | -xsd_integer(c2) | -xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(23,d,24,c)].
% 0.44/0.98  31 -xsd_integer(c2).  [copy(30),merge(c),merge(d),merge(e),merge(f),unit_del(a,27)].
% 0.44/0.98  32 -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | xsd_integer(c2) | -cowlThing(c1) | xsd_integer(c2) | xsd_integer(c2).  [resolve(26,d,25,c)].
% 0.44/0.98  33 $F.  [copy(32),merge(c),merge(d),merge(e),merge(f),unit_del(a,27),unit_del(b,31)].
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Given=0. Generated=5. Kept=2. proofs=1.
% 0.44/0.98  Usable=0. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=2, Disabled=27. Hints=0.
% 0.44/0.98  Megabytes=0.03.
% 0.44/0.98  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=1.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.44/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.44/0.98  
% 0.44/0.98  Process 7302 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jun  7 12:19:56 2022
% 0.44/0.99  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------