TSTP Solution File: KRS134+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS134+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:23 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS134+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:42:55 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % File : KRS134+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.19/0.62 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.19/0.62 % Problem : This is a typical definition of range from description logic
% 0.19/0.62 % Version : Especial.
% 0.19/0.62 % English :
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.19/0.62 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.19/0.62 % Source : [Bec03]
% 0.19/0.62 % Names : positive_I5.24-Manifest003 [Bec03]
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Status : Theorem
% 0.19/0.62 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.09 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.19/0.62 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 4 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of atoms : 13 ( 0 equ)
% 0.19/0.62 % Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 3 avg)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of connectives : 13 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 4 &)
% 0.19/0.62 % ( 2 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.19/0.62 % Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 5 avg)
% 0.19/0.62 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.19/0.62 % Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?)
% 0.19/0.62 % SPC : FOF_THM_EPR_NEQ
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.19/0.62 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.19/0.62 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.19/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.19/0.62 fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.62 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.19/0.62 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.19/0.62 fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.62 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.19/0.62 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %----Range: rprop
% 0.19/0.62 fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.19/0.62 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.19/0.62 ( rprop(X,Y)
% 0.19/0.62 => cA(Y) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.19/0.62 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.19/0.62 %----Super cowlThing
% 0.19/0.62 fof(the_axiom,conjecture,
% 0.19/0.62 ( ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.62 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.19/0.62 & ~ cowlNothing(X) )
% 0.19/0.62 & ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.62 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.19/0.62 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) )
% 0.19/0.62 & ! [X] :
% 0.19/0.62 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.19/0.62 => ! [Y] :
% 0.19/0.62 ( rprop(X,Y)
% 0.19/0.62 => cA(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.62 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.62 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.62 %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.62 %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:5)
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.19/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.62 %SharedTerms:11
% 0.19/0.62 %goalClause: 4 5 6 7
% 0.19/0.62 [1]~P1(x11)
% 0.19/0.62 [2]P4(x21)+P3(x21)
% 0.19/0.62 [3]~P4(x31)+~P3(x31)
% 0.19/0.62 [8]P2(x81)+~P5(x82,x81)
% 0.19/0.62 [4]P1(a1)+P3(a2)+~P4(a2)+~P2(a3)
% 0.19/0.62 [5]P1(a1)+P4(a2)+~P3(a2)+~P2(a3)
% 0.19/0.62 [6]P1(a1)+P3(a2)+P5(a4,a3)+~P4(a2)
% 0.19/0.62 [7]P5(a4,a3)+P1(a1)+P4(a2)+~P3(a2)
% 0.19/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.62
% 0.19/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(9,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P4(a2)+~P2(a3)+P3(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(10,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P3(a2)+~P2(a3)+P4(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P5(a4,a3)+~P4(a2)+P3(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(12,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P5(a4,a3)+~P3(a2)+P4(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P5(x141,a3)+P3(a2)+~P4(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,9])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P4(a2)+~P2(a3)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,2])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(16,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P5(x161,a3)+P4(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[15,8])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(17,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P3(a2)+P4(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,12])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(18,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P3(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,3])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(20,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (P5(a4,a3)+~P4(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,11])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(21,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 (~P5(x211,a3)+~P4(a2)),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,14])).
% 0.19/0.63 cnf(25,plain,
% 0.19/0.63 ($false),
% 0.19/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[18,2,21,20]),
% 0.19/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------