TSTP Solution File: KRS115+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS115+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 6.68s 2.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 38 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 38 RR)
% Number of literals : 78 ( 9 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ rf2(X3,X2)
| ~ rf2(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_27,plain,
( rf2(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_36,plain,
( rf2(X1,X2)
| ~ rr(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_23,plain,
( rr(X1,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_23) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ rf1(X3,X2)
| ~ rf1(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_25,plain,
( rf1(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
( rf1(X1,X2)
| ~ rr(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_30,plain,
( ~ cp2(X1)
| ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_32,plain,
( ra_Px1(X1,esk5_1(X1))
| ~ cp2xcomp(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_32) ).
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
( cp2xcomp(X1)
| ~ cp1(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_24,plain,
( cp1(esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(i_0_26,plain,
( cp2(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_35,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_30578),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-amj942yg/lgb.p',i_0_35) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ rf2(X3,X2)
| ~ rf2(X3,X1) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( rf2(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( rf2(X1,X2)
| ~ rr(X1,X2) ),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( rr(X1,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_23 ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ rf1(X3,X2)
| ~ rf1(X3,X1) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( rf1(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( rf1(X1,X2)
| ~ rr(X1,X2) ),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ cp2(X1)
| ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ra_Px1(X1,esk5_1(X1))
| ~ cp2xcomp(X1) ),
i_0_32 ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( cp2xcomp(X1)
| ~ cp1(X1) ),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( cp1(esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( X1 = esk1_1(X2)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rf2(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( rf2(X1,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( X1 = esk2_1(X2)
| ~ rf1(X2,X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( rf1(X1,esk3_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ cp2(X1)
| ~ cp2xcomp(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( cp2xcomp(esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
( esk3_1(X1) = esk1_1(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( esk3_1(X1) = esk2_1(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
( ~ cp2(esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( esk2_1(X1) = esk1_1(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
( cp2(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_30578),
i_0_35 ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),c_0_72]) ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS115+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 15:36:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 6.68/2.33 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.68/2.33 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.68/2.33 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.68/2.33 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 6.68/2.33 # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 6.68/2.33 #
% 6.68/2.33 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 6.68/2.33
% 6.68/2.33 # Proof found!
% 6.68/2.33 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.68/2.33 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.68/2.33 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.68/2.33
% 6.68/2.33 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.68/2.33 # User time : 0.025 s
% 6.68/2.33 # System time : 0.005 s
% 6.68/2.33 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 6.68/2.33 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 6.68/2.33
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------