TSTP Solution File: KRS113+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS113+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 6.87s 2.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.87s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 31 RR)
% Number of literals : 65 ( 4 equ; 40 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 41 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_31,plain,
( ~ cp(X1)
| ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_31) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( ra_Px1(X1,esk6_1(X1))
| ~ cpxcomp(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_37,plain,
( rinvS(X1,X2)
| ~ rs(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).
cnf(i_0_26,plain,
( rs(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_24,plain,
( cpxcomp(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).
cnf(i_0_29,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X3)
| ~ rr(X3,X2)
| ~ rr(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_29) ).
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
( rr(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_40,plain,
( rr(X1,X2)
| ~ rs(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).
cnf(i_0_36,plain,
( cp(X1)
| ~ ca_Vx2(X2)
| ~ rinvS(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).
cnf(i_0_27,plain,
( ca_Vx2(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_39,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_22376),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-pnfptjo4/lgb.p',i_0_39) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ cp(X1)
| ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
i_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ra_Px1(X1,esk6_1(X1))
| ~ cpxcomp(X1) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( rinvS(X1,X2)
| ~ rs(X2,X1) ),
i_0_37 ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( rs(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ cp(X1)
| ~ cpxcomp(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( cpxcomp(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X3)
| ~ rr(X3,X2)
| ~ rr(X3,X1) ),
i_0_29 ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( rr(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( rr(X1,X2)
| ~ rs(X1,X2) ),
i_0_40 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( cp(X1)
| ~ ca_Vx2(X2)
| ~ rinvS(X2,X1) ),
i_0_36 ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( rinvS(esk2_1(X1),X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ~ cp(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( X1 = esk1_1(X2)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
| ~ rr(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( rr(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_55]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ ca_Vx2(esk2_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]),c_0_63]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( esk2_1(X1) = esk1_1(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
( ca_Vx2(esk1_1(X1))
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_22376),
i_0_39 ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),c_0_68]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : KRS113+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 10:55:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 6.87/2.17 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.87/2.17 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.87/2.17 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.87/2.17 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 6.87/2.17 # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 6.87/2.17 #
% 6.87/2.17 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 6.87/2.17
% 6.87/2.17 # Proof found!
% 6.87/2.17 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.87/2.17 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.87/2.17 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.87/2.17
% 6.87/2.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.87/2.17 # User time : 0.026 s
% 6.87/2.17 # System time : 0.003 s
% 6.87/2.17 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 6.87/2.17 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 6.87/2.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------