TSTP Solution File: KRS112+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS112+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:18 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : KRS112+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:27:23 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.70 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.70 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.70 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.70 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.70 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.70
% 0.20/0.70 % Result :Theorem 0.060000s
% 0.20/0.70 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.060000s
% 0.20/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.71 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.71 % File : KRS112+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.20/0.71 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.20/0.71 % Problem : DL Test: t10.5
% 0.20/0.71 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.71 % English :
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.71 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.20/0.71 % Source : [Bec03]
% 0.20/0.71 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest613 [Bec03]
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.71 % Rating : 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.20/0.71 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.71 % Number of atoms : 109 ( 26 equ)
% 0.20/0.71 % Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.71 % Number of connectives : 73 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 32 &)
% 0.20/0.71 % ( 9 <=>; 29 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.71 % Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 5 avg)
% 0.20/0.71 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.71 % Number of predicates : 17 ( 16 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.71 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.20/0.71 % Number of variables : 92 ( 87 !; 5 ?)
% 0.20/0.71 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.20/0.71 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.20/0.71 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.20/0.71 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.71 fof(cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & cUnsatisfiable(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => cUnsatisfiable(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(ca_Ax2_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & ca_Ax2(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => ca_Ax2(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(ca_Vx3_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & ca_Vx3(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => ca_Vx3(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(cowlNothing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & cowlNothing(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => cowlNothing(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(cowlThing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & cowlThing(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => cowlThing(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(cp_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & cp(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => cp(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(cpxcomp_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & cpxcomp(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => cpxcomp(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(ra_Px1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & ra_Px1(A,C) )
% 0.20/0.71 => ra_Px1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(ra_Px1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & ra_Px1(C,A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => ra_Px1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rf_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rf(A,C) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rf(B,C) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rf_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rf(C,A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rf(C,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rf1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rf1(A,C) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rf1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rf1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rf1(C,A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rf1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rinvF_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rinvF(A,C) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rinvF(B,C) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rinvF_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rinvF(C,A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rinvF(C,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rinvF1_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rinvF1(A,C) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rinvF1(B,C) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rinvF1_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rinvF1(C,A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rinvF1(C,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rinvS_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rinvS(A,C) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rinvS(B,C) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rinvS_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rinvS(C,A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rinvS(C,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rs_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rs(A,C) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rs(B,C) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(rs_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & rs(C,A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => rs(C,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(xsd_integer_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & xsd_integer(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => xsd_integer(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 fof(xsd_string_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( ( A = B
% 0.20/0.71 & xsd_string(A) )
% 0.20/0.71 => xsd_string(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.20/0.71 fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.20/0.71 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.20/0.71 fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.20/0.71 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 %----Equality cUnsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.71 fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
% 0.20/0.71 <=> ( ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( rf1(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.71 & ca_Ax2(Y) )
% 0.20/0.71 & ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( rf(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.71 & cp(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 %----Equality cp
% 0.20/0.71 fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( cp(X)
% 0.20/0.71 <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 %----Equality cpxcomp
% 0.20/0.71 fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.20/0.71 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.71 ( cpxcomp(X)
% 0.20/0.71 <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ) ).
% 0.20/0.71
% 0.20/0.71 %----Equality ca_Ax2
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( ca_Ax2(X)
% 0.20/0.72 <=> ( cpxcomp(X)
% 0.20/0.72 & ! [Y] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( rinvF1(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 => ca_Vx3(Y) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %----Equality ca_Vx3
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( ca_Vx3(X)
% 0.20/0.72 <=> ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 & cowlThing(Y) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %----Functional: rf
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_7,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( ( rf(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 & rf(X,Z) )
% 0.20/0.72 => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %----Functional: rf1
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_8,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( ( rf1(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 & rf1(X,Z) )
% 0.20/0.72 => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %----Inverse: rinvF
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_9,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( rinvF(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 <=> rf(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %----Inverse: rinvF1
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_10,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( rinvF1(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 <=> rf1(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %----Inverse: rinvS
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_11,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( rinvS(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 <=> rs(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %----Functional: rs
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_12,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 & rs(X,Z) )
% 0.20/0.72 => Y = Z ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %----i2003_11_14_17_21_19256
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_13,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_19256) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_14,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 => rf(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 fof(axiom_15,axiom,
% 0.20/0.72 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.20/0.72 ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.20/0.72 => rf1(X,Y) ) ).
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.72 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.72 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.72 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.72 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.72 %ClaNum:61(EqnAxiom:31)
% 0.20/0.72 %VarNum:103(SingletonVarNum:49)
% 0.20/0.72 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.20/0.72 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.72 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.20/0.72 [32]P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.72 [33]~P2(x331)
% 0.20/0.72 [34]P15(x341)+P5(x341)
% 0.20/0.72 [35]~P3(x351)+P6(x351)
% 0.20/0.72 [36]~P15(x361)+~P5(x361)
% 0.20/0.72 [37]~P1(x371)+P3(f2(x371))
% 0.20/0.72 [38]~P1(x381)+P7(f3(x381))
% 0.20/0.72 [39]P7(x391)+P8(x391,f4(x391))
% 0.20/0.72 [42]~P6(x421)+P8(x421,f5(x421))
% 0.20/0.72 [43]~P1(x431)+P10(x431,f3(x431))
% 0.20/0.72 [44]~P1(x441)+P11(x441,f2(x441))
% 0.20/0.72 [45]~P4(x451)+P9(x451,f6(x451))
% 0.20/0.72 [40]P4(x401)+~P9(x401,x402)
% 0.20/0.72 [41]P6(x411)+~P8(x411,x412)
% 0.20/0.72 [47]~P7(x471)+~P8(x471,x472)
% 0.20/0.72 [50]~P13(x502,x501)+P10(x501,x502)
% 0.20/0.72 [51]~P9(x511,x512)+P10(x511,x512)
% 0.20/0.72 [52]~P12(x522,x521)+P11(x521,x522)
% 0.20/0.72 [53]~P9(x531,x532)+P11(x531,x532)
% 0.20/0.72 [54]~P10(x542,x541)+P13(x541,x542)
% 0.20/0.72 [55]~P11(x552,x551)+P12(x551,x552)
% 0.20/0.72 [56]~P9(x562,x561)+P14(x561,x562)
% 0.20/0.72 [57]~P14(x572,x571)+P9(x571,x572)
% 0.20/0.72 [46]~P6(x461)+P3(x461)+~P4(f7(x461))
% 0.20/0.72 [48]~P6(x481)+P3(x481)+P12(x481,f7(x481))
% 0.20/0.72 [49]~P12(x492,x491)+P4(x491)+~P3(x492)
% 0.20/0.72 [58]~P10(x583,x581)+E(x581,x582)+~P10(x583,x582)
% 0.20/0.72 [59]~P11(x593,x591)+E(x591,x592)+~P11(x593,x592)
% 0.20/0.72 [60]~P9(x603,x601)+E(x601,x602)+~P9(x603,x602)
% 0.20/0.72 [61]~P10(x611,x613)+~P11(x611,x612)+P1(x611)+~P3(x612)+~P7(x613)
% 0.20/0.72 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.72 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.72 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.72 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.72 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.20/0.72 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52))
% 0.20/0.72 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f4(x61),f4(x62))
% 0.20/0.72 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x71),f5(x72))
% 0.20/0.72 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f7(x81),f7(x82))
% 0.20/0.72 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f6(x91),f6(x92))
% 0.20/0.72 [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.20/0.72 [11]~P2(x111)+P2(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.20/0.72 [12]~P5(x121)+P5(x122)+~E(x121,x122)
% 0.20/0.72 [13]~P15(x131)+P15(x132)+~E(x131,x132)
% 0.20/0.72 [14]~P6(x141)+P6(x142)+~E(x141,x142)
% 0.20/0.72 [15]~P3(x151)+P3(x152)+~E(x151,x152)
% 0.20/0.72 [16]P9(x162,x163)+~E(x161,x162)+~P9(x161,x163)
% 0.20/0.72 [17]P9(x173,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P9(x173,x171)
% 0.20/0.72 [18]P12(x182,x183)+~E(x181,x182)+~P12(x181,x183)
% 0.20/0.72 [19]P12(x193,x192)+~E(x191,x192)+~P12(x193,x191)
% 0.20/0.72 [20]P14(x202,x203)+~E(x201,x202)+~P14(x201,x203)
% 0.20/0.72 [21]P14(x213,x212)+~E(x211,x212)+~P14(x213,x211)
% 0.20/0.72 [22]P11(x222,x223)+~E(x221,x222)+~P11(x221,x223)
% 0.20/0.72 [23]P11(x233,x232)+~E(x231,x232)+~P11(x233,x231)
% 0.20/0.72 [24]~P7(x241)+P7(x242)+~E(x241,x242)
% 0.20/0.72 [25]P10(x252,x253)+~E(x251,x252)+~P10(x251,x253)
% 0.20/0.72 [26]P10(x263,x262)+~E(x261,x262)+~P10(x263,x261)
% 0.20/0.72 [27]P8(x272,x273)+~E(x271,x272)+~P8(x271,x273)
% 0.20/0.72 [28]P8(x283,x282)+~E(x281,x282)+~P8(x283,x281)
% 0.20/0.72 [29]~P4(x291)+P4(x292)+~E(x291,x292)
% 0.20/0.72 [30]P13(x302,x303)+~E(x301,x302)+~P13(x301,x303)
% 0.20/0.72 [31]P13(x313,x312)+~E(x311,x312)+~P13(x313,x311)
% 0.20/0.72
% 0.20/0.72 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(62,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (P11(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,44])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(63,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (P10(a1,f3(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,44,43])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(64,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (P7(f3(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,44,43,38])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(66,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (P3(f2(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[32,44,43,38,37])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(84,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (~P11(a1,f3(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[64,66,62,63,55,54,47,35,42,27,49,29,59])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(87,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (P9(a1,f6(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[64,66,62,63,55,54,47,35,42,27,49,29,59,2,45])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(91,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (~P10(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[64,66,62,63,55,54,47,35,42,27,49,29,59,2,45,60,58])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(96,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (~P9(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[91,84,53,51])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(126,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (P11(a1,f6(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[87,53])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(130,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 (~E(f6(a1),f2(a1))),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[96,87,53,51,17])).
% 0.20/0.72 cnf(156,plain,
% 0.20/0.72 ($false),
% 0.20/0.72 inference(scs_inference,[],[130,126,62,59]),
% 0.20/0.72 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.72 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.72 % Total time :0.060000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------