TSTP Solution File: KRS110+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS110+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.42s 2.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ cp(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xjjkf235/input.p',i_0_33) ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( ra_Px1(X1,esk4_1(X1))
    | ~ cpxcomp(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xjjkf235/input.p',i_0_35) ).

cnf(i_0_29,plain,
    ( cpxcomp(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rs(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xjjkf235/input.p',i_0_29) ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    ( rs(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xjjkf235/input.p',i_0_31) ).

cnf(i_0_39,plain,
    ( cp(X1)
    | ~ ca_Ax2(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xjjkf235/input.p',i_0_39) ).

cnf(i_0_30,plain,
    ( ca_Ax2(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xjjkf235/input.p',i_0_30) ).

cnf(i_0_49,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_12565),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xjjkf235/input.p',i_0_49) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    ( ~ cp(X1)
    | ~ ra_Px1(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( ra_Px1(X1,esk4_1(X1))
    | ~ cpxcomp(X1) ),
    i_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( cpxcomp(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
    | ~ rs(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( rs(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    ( ~ cpxcomp(X1)
    | ~ cp(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( cpxcomp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( ~ cp(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( cp(X1)
    | ~ ca_Ax2(X1) ),
    i_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    ( ca_Ax2(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_30 ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_21_12565),
    i_0_49 ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_65]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : KRS110+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 07:01:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.42/2.16  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.42/2.16  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.42/2.16  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.42/2.16  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 4.42/2.16  # and selection function SelectCQPrecWNTNp.
% 4.42/2.16  #
% 4.42/2.16  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 4.42/2.16  
% 4.42/2.16  # Proof found!
% 4.42/2.16  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.42/2.16  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.42/2.16  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.42/2.16  
% 4.42/2.16  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.42/2.16  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 4.42/2.16  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 4.42/2.16  # Total time               : 0.030 s
% 4.42/2.16  # Maximum resident set size: 7116 pages
% 4.42/2.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------