TSTP Solution File: KRS106+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KRS106+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:45:11 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.78s 1.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   26
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (   8 unt;  18 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (  29   ~;  24   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   21 (  17   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (;  41   !;   5   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ rf3 > rf2 > rf1 > ra_Px1 > xsd_string > xsd_integer > cp2 > cp1xcomp > cp1 > cowlThing > cowlNothing > cUnsatisfiable > #nlpp > i2003_11_14_17_20_57644 > #skF_5 > #skF_2 > #skF_4 > #skF_1 > #skF_3

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff(cowlThing,type,
    cowlThing: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644,type,
    i2003_11_14_17_20_57644: $i ).

tff(cUnsatisfiable,type,
    cUnsatisfiable: $i > $o ).

tff(xsd_integer,type,
    xsd_integer: $i > $o ).

tff(ra_Px1,type,
    ra_Px1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(rf1,type,
    rf1: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xsd_string,type,
    xsd_string: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i > $i ).

tff(rf2,type,
    rf2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(rf3,type,
    rf3: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(cp1xcomp,type,
    cp1xcomp: $i > $o ).

tff(cp2,type,
    cp2: $i > $o ).

tff(cowlNothing,type,
    cowlNothing: $i > $o ).

tff(cp1,type,
    cp1: $i > $o ).

tff(f_189,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).

tff(f_153,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
    <=> ( ? [Y] :
            ( rf3(X,Y)
            & cp2(Y) )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( rf1(X,Y)
            & cp1(Y) )
        & ? [Y] :
            ( rf2(X,Y)
            & cp1xcomp(Y) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

tff(f_197,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rf3(X,Y)
     => rf2(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_10) ).

tff(f_180,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( rf2(X,Y)
        & rf2(X,Z) )
     => ( Y = Z ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_6) ).

tff(f_193,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rf3(X,Y)
     => rf1(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_9) ).

tff(f_173,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( rf1(X,Y)
        & rf1(X,Z) )
     => ( Y = Z ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).

tff(f_166,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cp1xcomp(X)
    <=> ? [Y0] : ra_Px1(X,Y0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).

tff(f_160,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cp1(X)
    <=> ~ ? [Y] : ra_Px1(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

tff(c_70,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_189]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    ! [X_95] :
      ( rf3(X_95,'#skF_1'(X_95))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_95) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_74,plain,
    ! [X_72,Y_73] :
      ( rf2(X_72,Y_73)
      | ~ rf3(X_72,Y_73) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_197]) ).

tff(c_128,plain,
    ! [X_95] :
      ( rf2(X_95,'#skF_1'(X_95))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_95) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_120,c_74]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [X_43] :
      ( rf2(X_43,'#skF_3'(X_43))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_43) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_143,plain,
    ! [Z_105,Y_106,X_107] :
      ( ( Z_105 = Y_106 )
      | ~ rf2(X_107,Z_105)
      | ~ rf2(X_107,Y_106) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_180]) ).

tff(c_222,plain,
    ! [Y_118,X_119] :
      ( ( Y_118 = '#skF_3'(X_119) )
      | ~ rf2(X_119,Y_118)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_119) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_143]) ).

tff(c_232,plain,
    ! [X_120] :
      ( ( '#skF_1'(X_120) = '#skF_3'(X_120) )
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_120) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_222]) ).

tff(c_236,plain,
    '#skF_1'(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644) = '#skF_3'(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_232]) ).

tff(c_72,plain,
    ! [X_70,Y_71] :
      ( rf1(X_70,Y_71)
      | ~ rf3(X_70,Y_71) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_193]) ).

tff(c_127,plain,
    ! [X_95] :
      ( rf1(X_95,'#skF_1'(X_95))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_95) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_120,c_72]) ).

tff(c_50,plain,
    ! [X_43] :
      ( rf1(X_43,'#skF_2'(X_43))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_43) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_132,plain,
    ! [Z_99,Y_100,X_101] :
      ( ( Z_99 = Y_100 )
      | ~ rf1(X_101,Z_99)
      | ~ rf1(X_101,Y_100) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_173]) ).

tff(c_163,plain,
    ! [Y_114,X_115] :
      ( ( Y_114 = '#skF_2'(X_115) )
      | ~ rf1(X_115,Y_114)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_115) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_132]) ).

tff(c_173,plain,
    ! [X_116] :
      ( ( '#skF_2'(X_116) = '#skF_1'(X_116) )
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_116) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_163]) ).

tff(c_177,plain,
    '#skF_2'(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644) = '#skF_1'(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_173]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    ! [X_43] :
      ( cp1('#skF_2'(X_43))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_43) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_184,plain,
    ( cp1('#skF_1'(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_177,c_48]) ).

tff(c_190,plain,
    cp1('#skF_1'(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_70,c_184]) ).

tff(c_249,plain,
    cp1('#skF_3'(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_236,c_190]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ! [X_43] :
      ( cp1xcomp('#skF_3'(X_43))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_43) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ! [X_89] :
      ( ra_Px1(X_89,'#skF_5'(X_89))
      | ~ cp1xcomp(X_89) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_166]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    ! [X_53,Y_56] :
      ( ~ ra_Px1(X_53,Y_56)
      | ~ cp1(X_53) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_160]) ).

tff(c_108,plain,
    ! [X_90] :
      ( ~ cp1(X_90)
      | ~ cp1xcomp(X_90) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_56]) ).

tff(c_116,plain,
    ! [X_43] :
      ( ~ cp1('#skF_3'(X_43))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_43) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_108]) ).

tff(c_277,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_57644),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_249,c_116]) ).

tff(c_281,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_70,c_277]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : KRS106+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 20:03:07 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.78/1.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.85  
% 3.78/1.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.78/1.88  
% 3.78/1.88  Inference rules
% 3.78/1.88  ----------------------
% 3.78/1.88  #Ref     : 0
% 3.78/1.88  #Sup     : 41
% 3.78/1.88  #Fact    : 0
% 3.78/1.88  #Define  : 0
% 3.78/1.88  #Split   : 0
% 3.78/1.88  #Chain   : 0
% 3.78/1.88  #Close   : 0
% 3.78/1.88  
% 3.78/1.88  Ordering : KBO
% 3.78/1.88  
% 3.78/1.88  Simplification rules
% 3.78/1.88  ----------------------
% 3.78/1.88  #Subsume      : 1
% 3.78/1.88  #Demod        : 16
% 3.78/1.88  #Tautology    : 34
% 3.78/1.88  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.78/1.88  #BackRed      : 4
% 3.78/1.88  
% 3.78/1.88  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.78/1.88  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.78/1.88  
% 3.78/1.88  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.78/1.88  ----------------------
% 3.78/1.88  Preprocessing        : 0.53
% 3.78/1.88  Parsing              : 0.28
% 3.78/1.88  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.78/1.88  Main loop            : 0.30
% 3.78/1.88  Inferencing          : 0.13
% 3.78/1.88  Reduction            : 0.07
% 3.78/1.88  Demodulation         : 0.05
% 3.78/1.88  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.78/1.88  Subsumption          : 0.06
% 3.78/1.88  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.78/1.88  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.78/1.88  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.78/1.88  Total                : 0.89
% 3.78/1.88  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.78/1.88  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.78/1.88  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.78/1.88  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------