TSTP Solution File: KRS095+1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:52:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 00:35:42 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.40 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.41 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.41 Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.21/0.41 fof(axiom_0, axiom, ![X]: (cowlThing(X) & ~cowlNothing(X))).
% 0.21/0.41 fof(axiom_1, axiom, ![X2]: (xsd_string(X2) <=> ~xsd_integer(X2))).
% 0.21/0.41 fof(axiom_2, axiom, ![X2]: (cUnsatisfiable(X2) <=> (?[Y0, Y1]: (rr(X2, Y0) & (rr(X2, Y1) & Y0!=Y1)) & ![Y0_2, Y1_2]: ((rr(X2, Y0_2) & rr(X2, Y1_2)) => Y0_2=Y1_2)))).
% 0.21/0.41 fof(axiom_3, axiom, ![X2]: (cc(X2) => ~cd(X2))).
% 0.21/0.41 fof(axiom_4, axiom, cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)).
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.21/0.41 http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.21/0.41 We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.21/0.41 fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.21/0.41 C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.21/0.41 where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.21/0.41 variables of u and v.
% 0.21/0.41 A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.21/0.41 input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 1 (axiom_4): cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253) = true2.
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 2 (axiom_2_3): fresh3(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 3 (axiom_2_2): fresh2(X, X, Y) = true2.
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 4 (axiom_2_4): fresh5(X, X, Y, Z) = Z.
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 5 (axiom_2_3): fresh3(cUnsatisfiable(X), true2, X) = rr(X, y0_2(X)).
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 6 (axiom_2_2): fresh2(cUnsatisfiable(X), true2, X) = rr(X, y1_2(X)).
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 7 (axiom_2_4): fresh(X, X, Y, Z, W) = Z.
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 8 (axiom_2_4): fresh4(X, X, Y, Z, W) = fresh5(cUnsatisfiable(Y), true2, Z, W).
% 0.21/0.41 Axiom 9 (axiom_2_4): fresh4(rr(X, Y), true2, X, Z, Y) = fresh(rr(X, Z), true2, X, Z, Y).
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Goal 1 (axiom_2): tuple2(y0_2(X), cUnsatisfiable(X)) = tuple2(y1_2(X), true2).
% 0.21/0.41 The goal is true when:
% 0.21/0.41 X = i2003_11_14_17_20_14253
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 Proof:
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 4 (axiom_2_4) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh5(true2, true2, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_4) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh5(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), true2, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 8 (axiom_2_4) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh4(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 2 (axiom_2_3) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh4(fresh3(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_4) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh4(fresh3(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 5 (axiom_2_3) }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh4(rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 9 (axiom_2_4) }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh(rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 6 (axiom_2_2) R->L }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh(fresh2(cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_4) }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh(fresh2(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 3 (axiom_2_2) }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(fresh(true2, true2, i2003_11_14_17_20_14253, y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), y0_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 7 (axiom_2_4) }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253))
% 0.21/0.41 = { by axiom 1 (axiom_4) }
% 0.21/0.41 tuple2(y1_2(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253), true2)
% 0.21/0.41 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------