TSTP Solution File: KRS095+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:28:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 9 00:04:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.37/0.58 % Version: 1.5
% 0.37/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.37/0.58 fof(axiom_4,axiom,cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_4)).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c8,plain,cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])).
% 0.37/0.58 fof(axiom_2,axiom,(![X]:(cUnsatisfiable(X)<=>((?[Y0]:(?[Y1]:((rr(X,Y0)&rr(X,Y1))&Y0!=Y1)))&(![Y0]:(![Y1]:((rr(X,Y0)&rr(X,Y1))=>Y0=Y1)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_2)).
% 0.37/0.58 fof(c13,plain,(![X]:((~cUnsatisfiable(X)|((?[Y0]:(?[Y1]:((rr(X,Y0)&rr(X,Y1))&Y0!=Y1)))&(![Y0]:(![Y1]:((~rr(X,Y0)|~rr(X,Y1))|Y0=Y1)))))&(((![Y0]:(![Y1]:((~rr(X,Y0)|~rr(X,Y1))|Y0=Y1)))|(?[Y0]:(?[Y1]:((rr(X,Y0)&rr(X,Y1))&Y0!=Y1))))|cUnsatisfiable(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])).
% 0.37/0.58 fof(c14,plain,((![X]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X)|((?[Y0]:(?[Y1]:((rr(X,Y0)&rr(X,Y1))&Y0!=Y1)))&(![Y0]:(![Y1]:((~rr(X,Y0)|~rr(X,Y1))|Y0=Y1))))))&(![X]:(((![Y0]:(![Y1]:((~rr(X,Y0)|~rr(X,Y1))|Y0=Y1)))|(?[Y0]:(?[Y1]:((rr(X,Y0)&rr(X,Y1))&Y0!=Y1))))|cUnsatisfiable(X)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c13])).
% 0.37/0.58 fof(c15,plain,((![X3]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X3)|((?[X4]:(?[X5]:((rr(X3,X4)&rr(X3,X5))&X4!=X5)))&(![X6]:(![X7]:((~rr(X3,X6)|~rr(X3,X7))|X6=X7))))))&(![X8]:(((![X9]:(![X10]:((~rr(X8,X9)|~rr(X8,X10))|X9=X10)))|(?[X11]:(?[X12]:((rr(X8,X11)&rr(X8,X12))&X11!=X12))))|cUnsatisfiable(X8)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c14])).
% 0.37/0.58 fof(c17,plain,(![X3]:(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:((~cUnsatisfiable(X3)|(((rr(X3,skolem0001(X3))&rr(X3,skolem0002(X3)))&skolem0001(X3)!=skolem0002(X3))&((~rr(X3,X6)|~rr(X3,X7))|X6=X7)))&((((~rr(X8,X9)|~rr(X8,X10))|X9=X10)|((rr(X8,skolem0003(X8))&rr(X8,skolem0004(X8)))&skolem0003(X8)!=skolem0004(X8)))|cUnsatisfiable(X8))))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c16,plain,((![X3]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X3)|(((rr(X3,skolem0001(X3))&rr(X3,skolem0002(X3)))&skolem0001(X3)!=skolem0002(X3))&(![X6]:(![X7]:((~rr(X3,X6)|~rr(X3,X7))|X6=X7))))))&(![X8]:(((![X9]:(![X10]:((~rr(X8,X9)|~rr(X8,X10))|X9=X10)))|((rr(X8,skolem0003(X8))&rr(X8,skolem0004(X8)))&skolem0003(X8)!=skolem0004(X8)))|cUnsatisfiable(X8)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c15])).])).
% 0.37/0.58 fof(c18,plain,(![X3]:(![X6]:(![X7]:(![X8]:(![X9]:(![X10]:(((((~cUnsatisfiable(X3)|rr(X3,skolem0001(X3)))&(~cUnsatisfiable(X3)|rr(X3,skolem0002(X3))))&(~cUnsatisfiable(X3)|skolem0001(X3)!=skolem0002(X3)))&(~cUnsatisfiable(X3)|((~rr(X3,X6)|~rr(X3,X7))|X6=X7)))&((((((~rr(X8,X9)|~rr(X8,X10))|X9=X10)|rr(X8,skolem0003(X8)))|cUnsatisfiable(X8))&((((~rr(X8,X9)|~rr(X8,X10))|X9=X10)|rr(X8,skolem0004(X8)))|cUnsatisfiable(X8)))&((((~rr(X8,X9)|~rr(X8,X10))|X9=X10)|skolem0003(X8)!=skolem0004(X8))|cUnsatisfiable(X8)))))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c17])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c21,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X88)|skolem0001(X88)!=skolem0002(X88),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c18])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(symmetry,axiom,X42!=X41|X41=X42,theory(equality)).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c20,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X54)|rr(X54,skolem0002(X54)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c18])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c71,plain,rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253,skolem0002(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c20, c8])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c19,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X47)|rr(X47,skolem0001(X47)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c18])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c68,plain,rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253,skolem0001(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19, c8])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c22,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X100)|~rr(X100,X101)|~rr(X100,X102)|X101=X102,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c18])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c85,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)|~rr(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253,X120)|X120=skolem0001(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c22, c68])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c99,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)|skolem0002(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)=skolem0001(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c85, c71])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c100,plain,skolem0002(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)=skolem0001(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c99, c8])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c109,plain,skolem0001(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253)=skolem0002(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c100, symmetry])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c118,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c109, c21])).
% 0.37/0.58 cnf(c120,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c118, c8])).
% 0.37/0.58 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.37/0.58
% 0.37/0.58 % Initial clauses : 33
% 0.37/0.58 % Processed clauses : 37
% 0.37/0.58 % Factors computed : 4
% 0.37/0.58 % Resolvents computed: 51
% 0.37/0.58 % Tautologies deleted: 8
% 0.37/0.58 % Forward subsumed : 19
% 0.37/0.58 % Backward subsumed : 2
% 0.37/0.58 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.37/0.58 % User time : 0.206 s
% 0.37/0.58 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.37/0.58 % Total time : 0.225 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------