TSTP Solution File: KRS095+1 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:43:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.50s 3.70s
% Output   : Proof 3.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 28 01:05:24 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.50/3.70  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/3.70  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #11 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.50/3.70    (∀ (X : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70      Iff (cUnsatisfiable X)
% 3.50/3.70        (And (Exists fun Y0 => Exists fun Y1 => And (And (rr X Y0) (rr X Y1)) (Ne Y0 Y1))
% 3.50/3.70          (∀ (Y0 Y1 : Iota), And (rr X Y0) (rr X Y1) → Eq Y0 Y1)))
% 3.50/3.70    True
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #13 (by assumption #[]): Eq (cUnsatisfiable i2003_11_14_17_20_14253) True
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #83 (by clausification #[11]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Eq
% 3.50/3.70      (Iff (cUnsatisfiable a)
% 3.50/3.70        (And (Exists fun Y0 => Exists fun Y1 => And (And (rr a Y0) (rr a Y1)) (Ne Y0 Y1))
% 3.50/3.70          (∀ (Y0 Y1 : Iota), And (rr a Y0) (rr a Y1) → Eq Y0 Y1)))
% 3.50/3.70      True
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #85 (by clausification #[83]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False)
% 3.50/3.70      (Eq
% 3.50/3.70        (And (Exists fun Y0 => Exists fun Y1 => And (And (rr a Y0) (rr a Y1)) (Ne Y0 Y1))
% 3.50/3.70          (∀ (Y0 Y1 : Iota), And (rr a Y0) (rr a Y1) → Eq Y0 Y1))
% 3.50/3.70        True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #100 (by clausification #[85]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Eq (∀ (Y0 Y1 : Iota), And (rr a Y0) (rr a Y1) → Eq Y0 Y1) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #101 (by clausification #[85]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False)
% 3.50/3.70      (Eq (Exists fun Y0 => Exists fun Y1 => And (And (rr a Y0) (rr a Y1)) (Ne Y0 Y1)) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #102 (by clausification #[100]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Eq (∀ (Y1 : Iota), And (rr a a_1) (rr a Y1) → Eq a_1 Y1) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #103 (by clausification #[102]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Eq (And (rr a a_1) (rr a a_2) → Eq a_1 a_2) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #104 (by clausification #[103]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Or (Eq (And (rr a a_1) (rr a a_2)) False) (Eq (Eq a_1 a_2) True))
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #105 (by clausification #[104]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Or (Eq (Eq a_1 a_2) True) (Or (Eq (rr a a_1) False) (Eq (rr a a_2) False)))
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #106 (by clausification #[105]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Or (Eq (rr a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (rr a a_2) False) (Eq a_1 a_2)))
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #107 (by superposition #[106, 13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a) False)
% 3.50/3.70      (Or (Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a_1) False) (Or (Eq a a_1) (Eq False True)))
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #108 (by clausification #[107]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a) False) (Or (Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a_1) False) (Eq a a_1))
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #109 (by clausification #[101]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False)
% 3.50/3.70      (Eq (Exists fun Y1 => And (And (rr a (skS.0 2 a a_1)) (rr a Y1)) (Ne (skS.0 2 a a_1) Y1)) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #110 (by clausification #[109]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.70    Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False)
% 3.50/3.70      (Eq (And (And (rr a (skS.0 2 a a_1)) (rr a (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2))) (Ne (skS.0 2 a a_1) (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2))) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #111 (by clausification #[110]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Eq (Ne (skS.0 2 a a_1) (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2)) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #112 (by clausification #[110]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Eq (And (rr a (skS.0 2 a a_1)) (rr a (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2))) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #113 (by clausification #[111]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Ne (skS.0 2 a a_1) (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2))
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #114 (by superposition #[113, 13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Ne (skS.0 2 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a) (skS.0 3 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a a_1)) (Eq False True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #115 (by clausification #[114]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Ne (skS.0 2 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a) (skS.0 3 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a a_1)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #116 (by clausification #[112]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Eq (rr a (skS.0 3 a a_1 a_2)) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #117 (by clausification #[112]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (cUnsatisfiable a) False) (Eq (rr a (skS.0 2 a a_1)) True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #118 (by superposition #[116, 13]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 (skS.0 3 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a a_1)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.50/3.70  Clause #120 (by superposition #[117, 13]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 (skS.0 2 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a)) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #121 (by clausification #[120]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 (skS.0 2 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a)) True
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #122 (by superposition #[121, 108]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.71    Or (Eq True False) (Or (Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a) False) (Eq (skS.0 2 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a_1) a))
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #126 (by clausification #[118]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 (skS.0 3 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a a_1)) True
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #131 (by clausification #[122]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (rr i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a) False) (Eq (skS.0 2 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a_1) a)
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #133 (by superposition #[131, 126]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.50/3.71    Or (Eq (skS.0 2 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a) (skS.0 3 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a_1 a_2)) (Eq False True)
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #140 (by clausification #[133]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (skS.0 2 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a) (skS.0 3 i2003_11_14_17_20_14253 a_1 a_2)
% 3.50/3.71  Clause #141 (by backward contextual literal cutting #[140, 115]): False
% 3.50/3.71  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------