TSTP Solution File: KRS095+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.52s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:03:05 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.52/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.52/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.52/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 % File : KRS095+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.52/0.60 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.52/0.60 % Problem : DL Test: heinsohn2.1
% 0.52/0.60 % Version : Especial.
% 0.52/0.60 % English : Tbox tests from [HK+94]
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Refs : [HK+94] Heinsohn et al. (1994), An Empirical Analysis of Termi
% 0.52/0.60 % : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.52/0.60 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.52/0.60 % Source : [Bec03]
% 0.52/0.60 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest105 [Bec03]
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.52/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.52/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of atoms : 41 ( 11 equ)
% 0.52/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of connectives : 31 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 14 &)
% 0.52/0.60 % ( 2 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.52/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 5 avg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.52/0.60 % Number of variables : 28 ( 26 !; 2 ?)
% 0.52/0.60 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_SEQ
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.52/0.60 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.52/0.60 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.52/0.60 % : Tests incoherency caused by number restrictions
% 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 fof(cUnsatisfiable_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & cUnsatisfiable(A) )
% 0.52/0.60 => cUnsatisfiable(B) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 fof(cc_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & cc(A) )
% 0.52/0.60 => cc(B) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 fof(cd_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & cd(A) )
% 0.52/0.60 => cd(B) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 fof(cowlNothing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & cowlNothing(A) )
% 0.52/0.60 => cowlNothing(B) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 fof(cowlThing_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & cowlThing(A) )
% 0.52/0.60 => cowlThing(B) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 fof(rr_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & rr(A,C) )
% 0.52/0.60 => rr(B,C) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 fof(rr_substitution_2,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B,C] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & rr(C,A) )
% 0.52/0.60 => rr(C,B) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 fof(xsd_integer_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & xsd_integer(A) )
% 0.52/0.60 => xsd_integer(B) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 fof(xsd_string_substitution_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [A,B] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( A = B
% 0.52/0.60 & xsd_string(A) )
% 0.52/0.60 => xsd_string(B) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.52/0.60 fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [X] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.52/0.60 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.52/0.60 fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [X] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.52/0.60 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 %----Equality cUnsatisfiable
% 0.52/0.60 fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [X] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
% 0.52/0.60 <=> ( ? [Y0,Y1] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( rr(X,Y0)
% 0.52/0.60 & rr(X,Y1)
% 0.52/0.60 & Y0 != Y1 )
% 0.52/0.60 & ! [Y0,Y1] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( ( rr(X,Y0)
% 0.52/0.60 & rr(X,Y1) )
% 0.52/0.60 => Y0 = Y1 ) ) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 %----Super cc
% 0.52/0.60 fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 ! [X] :
% 0.52/0.60 ( cc(X)
% 0.52/0.60 => ~ cd(X) ) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 %----i2003_11_14_17_20_14253
% 0.52/0.60 fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.52/0.60 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_14253) ).
% 0.52/0.60
% 0.52/0.60 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.52/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.52/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.52/0.60 %ClaNum:27(EqnAxiom:15)
% 0.52/0.60 %VarNum:50(SingletonVarNum:19)
% 0.52/0.61 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.52/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.52/0.61 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.52/0.61 [16]P1(a1)
% 0.52/0.61 [17]~P2(x171)
% 0.52/0.61 [18]P7(x181)+P5(x181)
% 0.52/0.61 [19]~P4(x191)+~P3(x191)
% 0.52/0.61 [20]~P7(x201)+~P5(x201)
% 0.52/0.61 [21]~P1(x211)+~E(f2(x211),f3(x211))
% 0.52/0.61 [22]~P1(x221)+P6(x221,f3(x221))
% 0.52/0.61 [23]~P1(x231)+P6(x231,f2(x231))
% 0.52/0.61 [24]~P6(x243,x242)+~P6(x243,x241)+E(x241,x242)+~P1(x243)
% 0.52/0.61 [25]~P6(x253,x252)+~P6(x253,x251)+E(x251,x252)+P1(x253)+~E(f4(x253),f5(x253))
% 0.52/0.61 [26]~P6(x263,x262)+~P6(x263,x261)+E(x261,x262)+P1(x263)+P6(x263,f5(x263))
% 0.52/0.61 [27]~P6(x273,x272)+~P6(x273,x271)+E(x271,x272)+P1(x273)+P6(x273,f4(x273))
% 0.52/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.52/0.61 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.52/0.61 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.52/0.61 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.52/0.61 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 0.52/0.61 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52))
% 0.52/0.61 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61),f5(x62))
% 0.52/0.61 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f4(x71),f4(x72))
% 0.52/0.61 [8]~P1(x81)+P1(x82)+~E(x81,x82)
% 0.52/0.61 [9]~P2(x91)+P2(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 0.52/0.61 [10]~P5(x101)+P5(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.52/0.61 [11]~P7(x111)+P7(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.52/0.61 [12]~P3(x121)+P3(x122)+~E(x121,x122)
% 0.52/0.61 [13]~P4(x131)+P4(x132)+~E(x131,x132)
% 0.52/0.61 [14]P6(x142,x143)+~E(x141,x142)+~P6(x141,x143)
% 0.52/0.61 [15]P6(x153,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P6(x153,x151)
% 0.52/0.61
% 0.52/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.52/0.61 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.52/0.61 (P6(a1,f2(a1))),
% 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,23])).
% 0.52/0.61 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.52/0.61 (P6(a1,f3(a1))),
% 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,23,22])).
% 0.52/0.61 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.52/0.61 (~E(f2(a1),f3(a1))),
% 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,23,22,21])).
% 0.52/0.61 cnf(35,plain,
% 0.52/0.61 ($false),
% 0.52/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[16,30,28,29,2,24]),
% 0.52/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.52/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.52/0.61 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------