TSTP Solution File: KRS093+1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : KRS093+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:12:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 21 ~; 14 |; 3 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 1 sgn 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(axiom_3,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cc(X1)
=> ~ cd(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.W9hnXEJSAF/E---3.1_12124.p',axiom_3) ).
fof(axiom_7,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cf(X1)
=> cd(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.W9hnXEJSAF/E---3.1_12124.p',axiom_7) ).
fof(axiom_6,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ce3(X1)
=> cc(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.W9hnXEJSAF/E---3.1_12124.p',axiom_6) ).
fof(axiom_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
<=> ( cf(X1)
& ce3(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.W9hnXEJSAF/E---3.1_12124.p',axiom_2) ).
fof(axiom_8,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_07201),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.W9hnXEJSAF/E---3.1_12124.p',axiom_8) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1] :
( cc(X1)
=> ~ cd(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_3]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5] :
( ~ cc(X5)
| ~ cd(X5) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X9] :
( ~ cf(X9)
| cd(X9) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_7])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ cc(X1)
| ~ cd(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( cd(X1)
| ~ cf(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X8] :
( ~ ce3(X8)
| cc(X8) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_6])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ cc(X1)
| ~ cf(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( cc(X1)
| ~ ce3(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X4] :
( ( cf(X4)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X4) )
& ( ce3(X4)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X4) )
& ( ~ cf(X4)
| ~ ce3(X4)
| cUnsatisfiable(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ ce3(X1)
| ~ cf(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ce3(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( cf(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_07201),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS093+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 13:43:04 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.W9hnXEJSAF/E---3.1_12124.p
% 0.21/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 12204 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 12215 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses : 13
% 0.21/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.21/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.21/0.49 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 15
% 0.21/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.21/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.21/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.21/0.49 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.21/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 0.21/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29
% 0.21/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 0.21/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.21/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.21/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 604
% 0.21/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 98
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.21/0.49
% 0.21/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.49 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.49 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.21/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.21/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------