TSTP Solution File: KRS093+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS093+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : KRS093+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:47:12 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.62 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.62 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.62 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.62
% 0.20/0.62 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 % File : KRS093+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.20/0.63 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.20/0.63 % Problem : DL Test: heinsohn1.3
% 0.20/0.63 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.63 % English : Tbox tests from [HK+94]
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 % Refs : [HK+94] Heinsohn et al. (1994), An Empirical Analysis of Termi
% 0.20/0.63 % : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.63 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.20/0.63 % Source : [Bec03]
% 0.20/0.63 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest103 [Bec03]
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.63 % Rating : 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.20/0.63 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of atoms : 18 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.63 % Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of connectives : 13 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% 0.20/0.63 % ( 2 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.63 % Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% 0.20/0.63 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of predicates : 11 ( 11 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.20/0.63 % Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?)
% 0.20/0.63 % SPC : FOF_UNS_EPR_NEQ
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.20/0.63 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.20/0.63 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.20/0.63 % : Tests incoherency caused by disjoint concept
% 0.20/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.20/0.63 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.20/0.63 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %----Equality cUnsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63 ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
% 0.20/0.63 <=> ( cf(X)
% 0.20/0.63 & ce3(X) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %----Super cc
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63 ( cc(X)
% 0.20/0.63 => ~ cd(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %----Super cc1
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63 ( cc1(X)
% 0.20/0.63 => ~ cd1(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %----Super cc1
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63 ( cc1(X)
% 0.20/0.63 => cd1(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %----Super ce3
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63 ( ce3(X)
% 0.20/0.63 => cc(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %----Super cf
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_7,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.63 ( cf(X)
% 0.20/0.63 => cd(X) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %----i2003_11_14_17_20_07201
% 0.20/0.63 fof(axiom_8,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_20_07201) ).
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.63 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.63 %VarNum:22(SingletonVarNum:11)
% 0.20/0.63 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.20/0.63 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.63 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.20/0.63 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.63 [2]~P2(x21)
% 0.20/0.63 [3]P10(x31)+P9(x31)
% 0.20/0.63 [4]~P1(x41)+P3(x41)
% 0.20/0.63 [5]~P1(x51)+P4(x51)
% 0.20/0.63 [6]~P4(x61)+P5(x61)
% 0.20/0.63 [7]~P3(x71)+P6(x71)
% 0.20/0.63 [8]~P7(x81)+P8(x81)
% 0.20/0.63 [9]~P10(x91)+~P9(x91)
% 0.20/0.63 [10]~P6(x101)+~P5(x101)
% 0.20/0.63 [11]~P8(x111)+~P7(x111)
% 0.20/0.63 [12]~P3(x121)+~P4(x121)+P1(x121)
% 0.20/0.63 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.63
% 0.20/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(13,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 (P4(a1)),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5])).
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 (P3(a1)),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,5,4])).
% 0.20/0.63 cnf(19,plain,
% 0.20/0.63 ($false),
% 0.20/0.63 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,14,7,6,10]),
% 0.20/0.63 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.63 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.63 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------