TSTP Solution File: KRS090+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : KRS090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:31:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.63s 2.86s
% Output   : Proof 2.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : KRS090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 07:52:05 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.63/2.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.63/2.86  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.63/2.86  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.63/2.86  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.63/2.86  1. (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (-. (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)))   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  2. (-. (cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))) (cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  3. ((cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) /\ ((cC1 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) /\ (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)))) (-. (cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)))   ### ConjTree 2
% 2.63/2.86  4. ((cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) => ((cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) /\ ((cC1 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) /\ (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))))) (-. (cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))   ### Imply 1 3
% 2.63/2.86  5. (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X))))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (-. (cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)))   ### All 4
% 2.63/2.86  6. (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (-. (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)))   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  7. (-. (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))) (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  8. ((cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) /\ ((cC1 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) /\ (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)))) (-. (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)))   ### ConjTree 7
% 2.63/2.86  9. ((cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) => ((cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) /\ ((cC1 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) /\ (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))))) (-. (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994))   ### Imply 6 8
% 2.63/2.86  10. (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X))))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (-. (cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)))   ### All 9
% 2.63/2.86  11. (rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0) (-. (rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  12. (-. (cC3 T_0)) (cC3 T_0)   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  13. ((rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0) => (cC3 T_0)) (-. (cC3 T_0)) (rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0)   ### Imply 11 12
% 2.63/2.86  14. (All Y, ((rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) Y) => (cC3 Y))) (rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0) (-. (cC3 T_0))   ### All 13
% 2.63/2.86  15. ((cC5 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) => (All Y, ((rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) Y) => (cC3 Y)))) (-. (cC3 T_0)) (rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X)))))   ### Imply 10 14
% 2.63/2.86  16. (All X, ((cC5 X) => (All Y, ((rR X Y) => (cC3 Y))))) (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X))))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0) (-. (cC3 T_0))   ### All 15
% 2.63/2.86  17. (-. (cB T_0)) (cB T_0)   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  18. (cC2 T_0) (-. (cC2 T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  19. (-. (cB T_0)) (cB T_0)   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  20. (-. (cA T_0)) (cA T_0)   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  21. ((cB T_0) \/ (cA T_0)) (-. (cA T_0)) (-. (cB T_0))   ### Or 19 20
% 2.63/2.86  22. (-. (cA T_0)) (cA T_0)   ### Axiom
% 2.63/2.86  23. ((-. (cB T_0)) \/ (cA T_0)) (-. (cA T_0)) ((cB T_0) \/ (cA T_0))   ### Or 21 22
% 2.63/2.86  24. (((-. (cB T_0)) \/ (cA T_0)) /\ ((cB T_0) \/ (cA T_0))) (-. (cA T_0))   ### And 23
% 2.63/2.86  25. ((cC2 T_0) => (((-. (cB T_0)) \/ (cA T_0)) /\ ((cB T_0) \/ (cA T_0)))) (-. (cA T_0)) (cC2 T_0)   ### Imply 18 24
% 2.63/2.86  26. (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X))))) (cC2 T_0) (-. (cA T_0))   ### All 25
% 2.63/2.86  27. ((cB T_0) \/ (-. (cA T_0))) (cC2 T_0) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X))))) (-. (cB T_0))   ### Or 17 26
% 2.63/2.86  28. ((-. (cB T_0)) \/ (-. (cA T_0))) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X))))) (cC2 T_0) ((cB T_0) \/ (-. (cA T_0)))   ### Or 27 26
% 2.63/2.86  29. (((-. (cB T_0)) \/ (-. (cA T_0))) /\ ((cB T_0) \/ (-. (cA T_0)))) (cC2 T_0) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X)))))   ### And 28
% 2.63/2.86  30. ((cC3 T_0) => (((-. (cB T_0)) \/ (-. (cA T_0))) /\ ((cB T_0) \/ (-. (cA T_0))))) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X))))) (cC2 T_0) (rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X))))) (All X, ((cC5 X) => (All Y, ((rR X Y) => (cC3 Y)))))   ### Imply 16 29
% 2.63/2.86  31. (All X, ((cC3 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (-. (cA X))) /\ ((cB X) \/ (-. (cA X)))))) (All X, ((cC5 X) => (All Y, ((rR X Y) => (cC3 Y))))) (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X))))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0) (cC2 T_0) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X)))))   ### All 30
% 2.63/2.86  32. ((rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) T_0) /\ (cC2 T_0)) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X))))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X))))) (All X, ((cC5 X) => (All Y, ((rR X Y) => (cC3 Y))))) (All X, ((cC3 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (-. (cA X))) /\ ((cB X) \/ (-. (cA X))))))   ### And 31
% 2.63/2.86  33. (Ex Y, ((rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) Y) /\ (cC2 Y))) (All X, ((cC3 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (-. (cA X))) /\ ((cB X) \/ (-. (cA X)))))) (All X, ((cC5 X) => (All Y, ((rR X Y) => (cC3 Y))))) (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X))))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X)))))   ### Exists 32
% 2.63/2.86  34. ((cC4 (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) => (Ex Y, ((rR (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994) Y) /\ (cC2 Y)))) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X))))) (All X, ((cC5 X) => (All Y, ((rR X Y) => (cC3 Y))))) (All X, ((cC3 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (-. (cA X))) /\ ((cB X) \/ (-. (cA X)))))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X)))))   ### Imply 5 33
% 2.63/2.86  35. (All X, ((cC4 X) => (Ex Y, ((rR X Y) /\ (cC2 Y))))) (All X, ((cTEST X) => ((cC4 X) /\ ((cC1 X) /\ (cC5 X))))) (cTEST (i2003_11_14_17_19_57994)) (All X, ((cC3 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (-. (cA X))) /\ ((cB X) \/ (-. (cA X)))))) (All X, ((cC5 X) => (All Y, ((rR X Y) => (cC3 Y))))) (All X, ((cC2 X) => (((-. (cB X)) \/ (cA X)) /\ ((cB X) \/ (cA X)))))   ### All 34
% 2.63/2.86  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.63/2.86  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------