TSTP Solution File: KRS090+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : KRS090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:30:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.48s
% Output : Refutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 4 unt; 1 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 39 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
cTEST(i2003_11_14_17_19_57994),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
cC2(skf1(u)),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(6,axiom,
( ~ cTEST(u)
| cC4(u) ),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
( ~ cTEST(u)
| cC5(u) ),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(42,axiom,
( ~ cC2(u)
| cB(u)
| cA(u) ),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(43,axiom,
( ~ cC4(u)
| rR(u,skf1(u)) ),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(44,axiom,
( ~ cB(u)
| ~ cC2(u)
| cA(u) ),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(45,axiom,
( ~ cA(u)
| ~ cC3(u)
| cB(u) ),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(46,axiom,
( ~ cB(u)
| ~ cA(u)
| ~ cC3(u) ),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(47,axiom,
( ~ cC5(u)
| ~ rR(u,v)
| cC3(v) ),
file('KRS090+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(48,plain,
( ~ cC2(u)
| cA(u) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[44,42]),
[iquote('0:MRR:44.0,42.1')] ).
cnf(49,plain,
( ~ cC3(u)
| ~ cA(u) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[46,45]),
[iquote('0:MRR:46.0,45.2')] ).
cnf(124,plain,
( ~ cC4(u)
| ~ cC5(u)
| cC3(skf1(u)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[43,47]),
[iquote('0:Res:43.1,47.1')] ).
cnf(125,plain,
( ~ cC4(u)
| ~ cC5(u)
| ~ cC2(skf1(u)) ),
inference(ems,[status(thm)],[49,124,48]),
[iquote('0:EmS:49.0,49.1,124.2,48.1')] ).
cnf(126,plain,
( ~ cC4(u)
| ~ cC5(u) ),
inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[125,4,124]),
[iquote('0:SSi:125.2,4.2,124.0')] ).
cnf(127,plain,
( ~ cTEST(u)
| ~ cTEST(u) ),
inference(ems,[status(thm)],[126,6,8]),
[iquote('0:EmS:126.0,126.1,6.1,8.1')] ).
cnf(128,plain,
~ cTEST(u),
inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[127]),
[iquote('0:Obv:127.0')] ).
cnf(129,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[128,2]),
[iquote('0:UnC:128.0,2.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14 % Problem : KRS090+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.15 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 08:04:10 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.48
% 0.24/0.48 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.24/0.48 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.24/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.48 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.48 SPASS derived 3 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 50 clauses.
% 0.24/0.48 SPASS allocated 97725 KBytes.
% 0.24/0.48 SPASS spent 0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.24/0.48 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.24/0.48 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.24/0.48 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.24/0.48 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.24/0.48 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.24/0.48
% 0.24/0.48
% 0.24/0.48 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 18 :
% 0.24/0.48 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.48 Formulae used in the proof : axiom_8 axiom_5 axiom_7 axiom_3 axiom_4 axiom_6
% 0.24/0.48
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------