TSTP Solution File: KRS082+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : KRS082+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:39:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : KRS082+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 02:34:09 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.63 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.63 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.63 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.63 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.63 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.63
% 0.21/0.63 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.63 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.63 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.64 % File : KRS082+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.21/0.64 % Domain : Knowledge Representation (Semantic Web)
% 0.21/0.64 % Problem : DL Test: t4.1 Dynamic blocking example
% 0.21/0.64 % Version : Especial.
% 0.21/0.64 % English :
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 % Refs : [Bec03] Bechhofer (2003), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.21/0.64 % : [TR+04] Tsarkov et al. (2004), Using Vampire to Reason with OW
% 0.21/0.64 % Source : [Bec03]
% 0.21/0.64 % Names : inconsistent_description-logic-Manifest023 [Bec03]
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v6.4.0, 0.25 v6.3.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.25 v6.1.0, 0.00 v3.1.0
% 0.21/0.64 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 1 unt; 0 def)
% 0.21/0.64 % Number of atoms : 38 ( 0 equ)
% 0.21/0.64 % Maximal formula atoms : 17 ( 3 avg)
% 0.21/0.64 % Number of connectives : 31 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 12 &)
% 0.21/0.64 % ( 5 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.21/0.64 % Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 5 avg)
% 0.21/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.21/0.64 % Number of predicates : 13 ( 13 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.21/0.64 % Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.21/0.64 % Number of variables : 27 ( 22 !; 5 ?)
% 0.21/0.64 % SPC : FOF_UNS_RFO_NEQ
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 % Comments : Sean Bechhofer says there are some errors in the encoding of
% 0.21/0.64 % datatypes, so this problem may not be perfect. At least it's
% 0.21/0.64 % still representative of the type of reasoning required for OWL.
% 0.21/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.64 %----Thing and Nothing
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_0,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( cowlThing(X)
% 0.21/0.64 & ~ cowlNothing(X) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----String and Integer disjoint
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_1,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( xsd_string(X)
% 0.21/0.64 <=> ~ xsd_integer(X) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----Super cUnsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_2,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
% 0.21/0.64 => ? [Y] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rs(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.64 & ? [Z] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rp(Y,Z)
% 0.21/0.64 & cowlThing(Z) )
% 0.21/0.64 & ! [Z] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rr(Y,Z)
% 0.21/0.64 => cc(Z) )
% 0.21/0.64 & ! [Z] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rp(Y,Z)
% 0.21/0.64 => ? [W] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rr(Z,W)
% 0.21/0.64 & cowlThing(W) ) )
% 0.21/0.64 & ! [Z] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rp(Y,Z)
% 0.21/0.64 => ? [W] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rp(Z,W)
% 0.21/0.64 & cowlThing(W) ) )
% 0.21/0.64 & ! [Z] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rp(Y,Z)
% 0.21/0.64 => ! [W] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rr(Z,W)
% 0.21/0.64 => cc(W) ) )
% 0.21/0.64 & ? [Z] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rr(Y,Z)
% 0.21/0.64 & cowlThing(Z) ) ) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----Super cUnsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_3,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
% 0.21/0.64 => ca(X) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----Equality cc
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_4,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( cc(X)
% 0.21/0.64 <=> ! [Y] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rinvR(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.64 => ! [Z] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rinvP(Y,Z)
% 0.21/0.64 => ! [W] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rinvS(Z,W)
% 0.21/0.64 => ~ ca(W) ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----Inverse: rinvP
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_5,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rinvP(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.64 <=> rp(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----Inverse: rinvR
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_6,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rinvR(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.64 <=> rr(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----Inverse: rinvS
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_7,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X,Y] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( rinvS(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.64 <=> rs(Y,X) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----Transitive: rp
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_8,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 ! [X,Y,Z] :
% 0.21/0.64 ( ( rp(X,Y)
% 0.21/0.64 & rp(Y,Z) )
% 0.21/0.64 => rp(X,Z) ) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %----i2003_11_14_17_19_28752
% 0.21/0.64 fof(axiom_9,axiom,
% 0.21/0.64 cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_19_28752) ).
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.64 %ClaNum:24(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.64 %VarNum:87(SingletonVarNum:39)
% 0.21/0.64 %MaxLitNum:5
% 0.21/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.21/0.64 %SharedTerms:2
% 0.21/0.64 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.21/0.64 [2]~P2(x21)
% 0.21/0.64 [3]P6(x31)+P5(x31)
% 0.21/0.64 [4]~P1(x41)+P3(x41)
% 0.21/0.64 [5]~P6(x51)+~P5(x51)
% 0.21/0.64 [6]P4(x61)+P3(f2(x61))
% 0.21/0.64 [7]P4(x71)+P7(x71,f3(x71))
% 0.21/0.64 [8]~P1(x81)+P9(x81,f4(x81))
% 0.21/0.64 [9]P4(x91)+P8(f3(x91),f9(x91))
% 0.21/0.64 [10]P4(x101)+P10(f9(x101),f2(x101))
% 0.21/0.64 [11]~P1(x111)+P11(f4(x111),f5(x111))
% 0.21/0.64 [12]~P1(x121)+P12(f4(x121),f6(x121))
% 0.21/0.64 [13]~P10(x132,x131)+P9(x131,x132)
% 0.21/0.64 [14]~P8(x142,x141)+P11(x141,x142)
% 0.21/0.64 [15]~P7(x152,x151)+P12(x151,x152)
% 0.21/0.64 [16]~P12(x162,x161)+P7(x161,x162)
% 0.21/0.64 [17]~P11(x172,x171)+P8(x171,x172)
% 0.21/0.64 [18]~P9(x182,x181)+P10(x181,x182)
% 0.21/0.64 [19]P4(x191)+~P1(x192)+~P12(f4(x192),x191)
% 0.21/0.64 [22]~P1(x222)+~P11(f4(x222),x221)+P11(x221,f7(x222,x221))
% 0.21/0.64 [23]~P1(x232)+~P11(f4(x232),x231)+P12(x231,f8(x232,x231))
% 0.21/0.64 [20]~P11(x201,x203)+P11(x201,x202)+~P11(x203,x202)
% 0.21/0.64 [21]P4(x211)+~P12(x213,x211)+~P1(x212)+~P11(f4(x212),x213)
% 0.21/0.64 [24]~P10(x244,x242)+~P4(x241)+~P7(x241,x243)+~P3(x242)+~P8(x243,x244)
% 0.21/0.64 %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.64
% 0.21/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.64 cnf(25,plain,
% 0.21/0.64 (P3(a1)),
% 0.21/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4])).
% 0.21/0.64 cnf(26,plain,
% 0.21/0.64 (P9(a1,f4(a1))),
% 0.21/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,8])).
% 0.21/0.64 cnf(29,plain,
% 0.21/0.64 (P11(f4(a1),f5(a1))),
% 0.21/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,8,12,11])).
% 0.21/0.64 cnf(33,plain,
% 0.21/0.64 (P12(f5(a1),f8(a1,f5(a1)))),
% 0.21/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,8,12,11,20,23])).
% 0.21/0.64 cnf(39,plain,
% 0.21/0.64 (P4(f8(a1,f5(a1)))),
% 0.21/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,8,12,11,20,23,22,19,21])).
% 0.21/0.64 cnf(41,plain,
% 0.21/0.64 (P10(f4(a1),a1)),
% 0.21/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[26,18])).
% 0.21/0.64 cnf(68,plain,
% 0.21/0.64 ($false),
% 0.21/0.64 inference(scs_inference,[],[25,33,29,39,41,17,24,16]),
% 0.21/0.64 ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.64 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.64 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------