TSTP Solution File: KRS073+1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : KRS073+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:00:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : KRS073+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 11:58:05 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.33  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.33  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.15/0.33  # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 0.15/0.33  #
% 0.15/0.33  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.33  # Number of axioms: 24 Number of unprocessed: 24
% 0.15/0.33  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.15/0.33  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.15/0.33  # Hello from C++
% 0.15/0.33  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.15/0.33  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.15/0.33  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.15/0.33  # 24 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.15/0.33  # No conjectures after preprocessing.  Attempting to resurrect them from ax_archive.
% 0.15/0.33  # No conjectures.
% 0.15/0.33  # There are 24 start rule candidates:
% 0.15/0.33  # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.15/0.33  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.15/0.33  # 24 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.15/0.33  # 22 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.15/0.33  # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.15/0.33  
% 0.15/0.33  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.34  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.34  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.34  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.34  
% 0.15/0.34  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.34  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~cowlNothing(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~cp(X1)|~cUnsatisfiable(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (~xsd_string(X1)|~xsd_integer(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (xsd_string(X1)|xsd_integer(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (rf(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~cUnsatisfiable(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (rf(X1,X2)|~rinvF(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (rf(X1,X2)|~rs(X1,X2))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (rf1(X1,X2)|~rinvF1(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (rs(X1,X2)|~rinvS(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (rf1(X1,X2)|~rs(X1,X2))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (rinvF(X1,X2)|~rf(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (rinvF1(X1,X2)|~rf1(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (rinvS(X1,X2)|~rs(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (cp(X1)|~rinvS(esk1_1(X2),X1)|~cUnsatisfiable(X2))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (X1=X2|~rf(X3,X2)|~rf(X3,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (X1=X2|~rf1(X3,X2)|~rf1(X3,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (X1=X2|~rs(X3,X2)|~rs(X3,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (cp(esk2_2(X1,X2))|~rinvF(esk1_1(X1),X2)|~cUnsatisfiable(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (rs(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1))|~rinvF(esk1_1(X2),X1)|~cUnsatisfiable(X2))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (cp(X1)|cUnsatisfiable(X1)|~rs(esk4_2(X1,X2),X3)|~rf(X1,X2)|~cp(esk3_2(X1,X2))|~cp(X3))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (rinvF(X1,esk4_2(X2,X1))|cp(X2)|cUnsatisfiable(X2)|~rf(X2,X1)|~cp(esk3_2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (rinvS(X1,esk3_2(X2,X1))|rinvF(X1,esk4_2(X2,X1))|cp(X2)|cUnsatisfiable(X2)|~rf(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (rinvS(X1,esk3_2(X2,X1))|cp(X2)|cUnsatisfiable(X2)|~rs(esk4_2(X2,X1),X3)|~rf(X2,X1)|~cp(X3))).
% 0.15/0.34  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.34  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.34  # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~cp(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)|~cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (~cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (~cp(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_136, plain, (~cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_135, plain, (~rinvS(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369),i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_38])).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_160, plain, (~rs(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369,esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_160, ...])).
% 0.15/0.34  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.34  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.34  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.34  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.34  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.34  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.34  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.34  
% 0.15/0.34  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.34  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~cowlNothing(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (~cp(X1)|~cUnsatisfiable(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (~xsd_string(X1)|~xsd_integer(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (xsd_string(X1)|xsd_integer(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (rf(X1,esk1_1(X1))|~cUnsatisfiable(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (rf(X1,X2)|~rinvF(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (rf(X1,X2)|~rs(X1,X2))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (rf1(X1,X2)|~rinvF1(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (rs(X1,X2)|~rinvS(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (rf1(X1,X2)|~rs(X1,X2))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (rinvF(X1,X2)|~rf(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (rinvF1(X1,X2)|~rf1(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (rinvS(X1,X2)|~rs(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (cp(X1)|~rinvS(esk1_1(X2),X1)|~cUnsatisfiable(X2))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (X1=X2|~rf(X3,X2)|~rf(X3,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (X1=X2|~rf1(X3,X2)|~rf1(X3,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (X1=X2|~rs(X3,X2)|~rs(X3,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (cp(esk2_2(X1,X2))|~rinvF(esk1_1(X1),X2)|~cUnsatisfiable(X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (rs(X1,esk2_2(X2,X1))|~rinvF(esk1_1(X2),X1)|~cUnsatisfiable(X2))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (cp(X1)|cUnsatisfiable(X1)|~rs(esk4_2(X1,X2),X3)|~rf(X1,X2)|~cp(esk3_2(X1,X2))|~cp(X3))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (rinvF(X1,esk4_2(X2,X1))|cp(X2)|cUnsatisfiable(X2)|~rf(X2,X1)|~cp(esk3_2(X2,X1)))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (rinvS(X1,esk3_2(X2,X1))|rinvF(X1,esk4_2(X2,X1))|cp(X2)|cUnsatisfiable(X2)|~rf(X2,X1))).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (rinvS(X1,esk3_2(X2,X1))|cp(X2)|cUnsatisfiable(X2)|~rs(esk4_2(X2,X1),X3)|~rf(X2,X1)|~cp(X3))).
% 0.15/0.34  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.34  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.34  # Found 5 steps
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_110, plain, (~cp(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_30])).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_136, plain, (~cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_41])).
% 0.15/0.34  cnf(i_0_135, plain, (~rinvS(esk1_1(i2003_11_14_17_18_54369),i2003_11_14_17_18_54369)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_135, ...])).
% 0.15/0.34  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.34  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.34  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.34  # Child (20947) has found a proof.
% 0.15/0.34  
% 0.15/0.34  # Proof search is over...
% 0.15/0.34  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------