TSTP Solution File: KRS072+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : KRS072+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:45:06 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.56s 1.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   21
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (   4 unt;  17 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  22   ~;  20   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   20 (  16   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  12 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  23   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ rr > rinvR > xsd_string > xsd_integer > cp5 > cp4 > cp3 > cp2 > cp1 > cowlThing > cowlNothing > cUnsatisfiable > #nlpp > i2003_11_14_17_18_50190 > #skF_4 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(rinvR,type,
    rinvR: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(cp5,type,
    cp5: $i > $o ).

tff(rr,type,
    rr: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff(cowlThing,type,
    cowlThing: $i > $o ).

tff(i2003_11_14_17_18_50190,type,
    i2003_11_14_17_18_50190: $i ).

tff(cp4,type,
    cp4: $i > $o ).

tff(cUnsatisfiable,type,
    cUnsatisfiable: $i > $o ).

tff(xsd_integer,type,
    xsd_integer: $i > $o ).

tff(cp3,type,
    cp3: $i > $o ).

tff(xsd_string,type,
    xsd_string: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(cp2,type,
    cp2: $i > $o ).

tff(cowlNothing,type,
    cowlNothing: $i > $o ).

tff(cp1,type,
    cp1: $i > $o ).

tff(f_186,axiom,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_50190),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).

tff(f_143,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cUnsatisfiable(X)
    <=> ( ? [Y] :
            ( rinvR(X,Y)
            & ! [Z0,Z1] :
                ( ( rr(Y,Z0)
                  & rr(Y,Z1) )
               => ( Z0 = Z1 ) )
            & ? [Z] :
                ( rr(Y,Z)
                & cp1(Z) ) )
        & cp2(X) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).

tff(f_184,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( rinvR(X,Y)
    <=> rr(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_7) ).

tff(f_155,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( cp1(X)
     => ~ ( cp3(X)
          | cp2(X)
          | cp4(X)
          | cp5(X) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).

tff(c_78,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_50190),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_186]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [X_35] :
      ( rinvR(X_35,'#skF_3'(X_35))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_35) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_143]) ).

tff(c_74,plain,
    ! [Y_65,X_64] :
      ( rr(Y_65,X_64)
      | ~ rinvR(X_64,Y_65) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_184]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    ! [X_35] :
      ( rr('#skF_3'(X_35),'#skF_4'(X_35))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_35) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_143]) ).

tff(c_122,plain,
    ! [Z1_91,Z0_92,X_93] :
      ( ( Z1_91 = Z0_92 )
      | ~ rr('#skF_3'(X_93),Z1_91)
      | ~ rr('#skF_3'(X_93),Z0_92)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_93) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_143]) ).

tff(c_137,plain,
    ! [Z0_97,X_98] :
      ( ( Z0_97 = '#skF_4'(X_98) )
      | ~ rr('#skF_3'(X_98),Z0_97)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_98) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_122]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    ! [X_99,X_100] :
      ( ( X_99 = '#skF_4'(X_100) )
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_100)
      | ~ rinvR(X_99,'#skF_3'(X_100)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_74,c_137]) ).

tff(c_158,plain,
    ! [X_101] :
      ( ( '#skF_4'(X_101) = X_101 )
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_101) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_148]) ).

tff(c_162,plain,
    '#skF_4'(i2003_11_14_17_18_50190) = i2003_11_14_17_18_50190,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_78,c_158]) ).

tff(c_103,plain,
    ! [X_82] :
      ( cp1('#skF_4'(X_82))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_82) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_143]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ! [X_35] :
      ( cp2(X_35)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_35) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_143]) ).

tff(c_92,plain,
    ! [X_75] :
      ( ~ cp2(X_75)
      | ~ cp1(X_75) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_155]) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    ! [X_35] :
      ( ~ cp1(X_35)
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_35) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_92]) ).

tff(c_107,plain,
    ! [X_82] :
      ( ~ cUnsatisfiable('#skF_4'(X_82))
      | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_82) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_96]) ).

tff(c_179,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_50190)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_50190) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_162,c_107]) ).

tff(c_191,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_78,c_78,c_179]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : KRS072+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 20:28:29 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.56/1.83  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/1.84  
% 3.56/1.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.56/1.87  
% 3.56/1.87  Inference rules
% 3.56/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.87  #Ref     : 0
% 3.56/1.87  #Sup     : 22
% 3.56/1.87  #Fact    : 0
% 3.56/1.87  #Define  : 0
% 3.56/1.87  #Split   : 0
% 3.56/1.87  #Chain   : 0
% 3.56/1.87  #Close   : 0
% 3.56/1.87  
% 3.56/1.87  Ordering : KBO
% 3.56/1.87  
% 3.56/1.87  Simplification rules
% 3.56/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.87  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.56/1.87  #Demod        : 4
% 3.56/1.87  #Tautology    : 19
% 3.56/1.87  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.56/1.87  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.56/1.87  
% 3.56/1.87  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.56/1.87  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.56/1.87  
% 3.56/1.87  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.56/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.87  Preprocessing        : 0.55
% 3.56/1.87  Parsing              : 0.28
% 3.56/1.87  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.56/1.87  Main loop            : 0.24
% 3.56/1.87  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.56/1.87  Reduction            : 0.06
% 3.56/1.87  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.56/1.87  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.56/1.87  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.56/1.87  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.56/1.87  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.56/1.87  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.56/1.87  Total                : 0.83
% 3.56/1.87  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.56/1.87  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.87  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.56/1.87  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------