TSTP Solution File: KRS070+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : KRS070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:55:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.46s 2.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   55 (   6 equ;  34 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_40,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ rrx(X3,X2)
    | ~ rrx(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_40) ).

cnf(i_0_53,plain,
    ( rrx(X1,X2)
    | ~ rrx4(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_46,plain,
    ( rrx(X1,X2)
    | ~ rrx3(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    ( rrx3(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_36) ).

cnf(i_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ cc1(X2)
    | ~ cc2(X2)
    | ~ rrx3(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_37) ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( cc1(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_35) ).

cnf(i_0_39,plain,
    ( rrx4(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_39) ).

cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    ( cc2(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_38) ).

cnf(i_0_45,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_32242),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-rjaqv1m4/lgb.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ rrx(X3,X2)
    | ~ rrx(X3,X1) ),
    i_0_40 ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    ( rrx(X1,X2)
    | ~ rrx4(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ rrx(X3,X1)
    | ~ rrx4(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,plain,
    ( rrx(X1,X2)
    | ~ rrx3(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ rrx3(X3,X1)
    | ~ rrx4(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_66]) ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( rrx3(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ cc1(X2)
    | ~ cc2(X2)
    | ~ rrx3(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( cc1(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( esk2_1(X1) = X2
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
    | ~ rrx4(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( rrx4(X1,esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( ~ cc2(esk2_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_68]),c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( esk2_1(X1) = esk1_1(X1)
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( cc2(esk1_1(X1))
    | ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
    i_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_32242),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),c_0_75]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : KRS070+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 09:51:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.46/2.38  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.46/2.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.46/2.38  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.46/2.38  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.46/2.38  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 4.46/2.38  #
% 4.46/2.38  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 4.46/2.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.46/2.38  
% 4.46/2.38  # Proof found!
% 4.46/2.38  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.46/2.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.46/2.38  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.46/2.38  
% 4.46/2.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.46/2.38  # User time                : 0.024 s
% 4.46/2.38  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 4.46/2.38  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 4.46/2.38  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 4.46/2.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------