TSTP Solution File: KRS068+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : KRS068+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 12:56:49 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 65 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 65 ( 29 ~; 25 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 1 sgn 21 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
=> cc(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpii-nBb/sel_KRS068+1.p_1',axiom_2) ).
fof(2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
=> ~ cd(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpii-nBb/sel_KRS068+1.p_1',axiom_3) ).
fof(5,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( rr(X1,X2)
=> cc(X2) )
=> cd(X1) ),
file('/tmp/tmpii-nBb/sel_KRS068+1.p_1',axiom_6) ).
fof(6,axiom,
! [X1] :
( cc(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( rr(X1,X2)
=> cc(X2) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpii-nBb/sel_KRS068+1.p_1',axiom_4) ).
fof(7,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_23845),
file('/tmp/tmpii-nBb/sel_KRS068+1.p_1',axiom_5) ).
fof(8,plain,
! [X1] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X1)
=> ~ cd(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[2,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(11,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| cc(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(12,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
| cc(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
cnf(13,plain,
( cc(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
fof(14,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cd(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
fof(15,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X2)
| ~ cd(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
cnf(16,plain,
( ~ cd(X1)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
fof(24,plain,
! [X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( rr(X1,X2)
& ~ cc(X2) )
| cd(X1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
fof(25,plain,
! [X3] :
( ? [X4] :
( rr(X3,X4)
& ~ cc(X4) )
| cd(X3) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
fof(26,plain,
! [X3] :
( ( rr(X3,esk1_1(X3))
& ~ cc(esk1_1(X3)) )
| cd(X3) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[25]) ).
fof(27,plain,
! [X3] :
( ( rr(X3,esk1_1(X3))
| cd(X3) )
& ( ~ cc(esk1_1(X3))
| cd(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
cnf(28,plain,
( cd(X1)
| ~ cc(esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
cnf(29,plain,
( cd(X1)
| rr(X1,esk1_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
fof(30,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ cc(X1)
| ! [X2] :
( ~ rr(X1,X2)
| cc(X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
fof(31,plain,
! [X3] :
( ~ cc(X3)
| ! [X4] :
( ~ rr(X3,X4)
| cc(X4) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
fof(32,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ rr(X3,X4)
| cc(X4)
| ~ cc(X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[31]) ).
cnf(33,plain,
( cc(X2)
| ~ cc(X1)
| ~ rr(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
cnf(34,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_23845),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
cnf(36,plain,
( cc(esk1_1(X1))
| cd(X1)
| ~ cc(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[33,29,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(38,plain,
( cd(X1)
| ~ cc(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[36,28]) ).
cnf(39,plain,
( ~ cUnsatisfiable(X1)
| ~ cc(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[16,38,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(40,plain,
~ cUnsatisfiable(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[39,13]) ).
cnf(41,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[34,40,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(42,plain,
$false,
41,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KRS/KRS068+1.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpii-nBb/sel_KRS068+1.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Unsatisfiable
% Problem KRS068+1.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KRS/KRS068+1.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/KRS/KRS068+1.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------