TSTP Solution File: KRS067+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : KRS067+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:28:36 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.59s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14 % Problem : KRS067+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.09/0.15 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Thu May 9 00:16:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.59 % Version: 1.5
% 0.22/0.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.59 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.59 fof(axiom_3,axiom,(![X]:(ca(X)=>(~(cc(X)|cb(X))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_3)).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c5,plain,(![X]:(~ca(X)|(~cc(X)&~cb(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_3])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c6,plain,(![X3]:(~ca(X3)|(~cc(X3)&~cb(X3)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c7,plain,(![X3]:((~ca(X3)|~cc(X3))&(~ca(X3)|~cb(X3)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c6])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c8,plain,~ca(X13)|~cc(X13),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c9,plain,~ca(X14)|~cb(X14),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c7])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(axiom_5,axiom,cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_5)).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c0,plain,cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[axiom_5])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(axiom_2,axiom,(![X]:(cUnsatisfiable(X)<=>(((cc(X)&cb(X))|(cb(X)&ca(X)))|(cc(X)&ca(X))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_2)).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c10,plain,(![X]:((~cUnsatisfiable(X)|(((cc(X)&cb(X))|(cb(X)&ca(X)))|(cc(X)&ca(X))))&((((~cc(X)|~cb(X))&(~cb(X)|~ca(X)))&(~cc(X)|~ca(X)))|cUnsatisfiable(X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[axiom_2])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c11,plain,((![X]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X)|(((cc(X)&cb(X))|(cb(X)&ca(X)))|(cc(X)&ca(X)))))&(![X]:((((~cc(X)|~cb(X))&(~cb(X)|~ca(X)))&(~cc(X)|~ca(X)))|cUnsatisfiable(X)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c10])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c13,plain,(![X4]:(![X5]:((~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|(((cc(X4)&cb(X4))|(cb(X4)&ca(X4)))|(cc(X4)&ca(X4))))&((((~cc(X5)|~cb(X5))&(~cb(X5)|~ca(X5)))&(~cc(X5)|~ca(X5)))|cUnsatisfiable(X5))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c12,plain,((![X4]:(~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|(((cc(X4)&cb(X4))|(cb(X4)&ca(X4)))|(cc(X4)&ca(X4)))))&(![X5]:((((~cc(X5)|~cb(X5))&(~cb(X5)|~ca(X5)))&(~cc(X5)|~ca(X5)))|cUnsatisfiable(X5)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c11])).])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c14,plain,(![X4]:(![X5]:(((((~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|((cc(X4)|cb(X4))|cc(X4)))&(~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|((cc(X4)|cb(X4))|ca(X4))))&((~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|((cc(X4)|ca(X4))|cc(X4)))&(~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|((cc(X4)|ca(X4))|ca(X4)))))&(((~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|((cb(X4)|cb(X4))|cc(X4)))&(~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|((cb(X4)|cb(X4))|ca(X4))))&((~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|((cb(X4)|ca(X4))|cc(X4)))&(~cUnsatisfiable(X4)|((cb(X4)|ca(X4))|ca(X4))))))&((((~cc(X5)|~cb(X5))|cUnsatisfiable(X5))&((~cb(X5)|~ca(X5))|cUnsatisfiable(X5)))&((~cc(X5)|~ca(X5))|cUnsatisfiable(X5)))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c13])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c15,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X20)|cc(X20)|cb(X20)|cc(X20),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c14])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c40,plain,cc(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956)|cb(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c15, c0])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c43,plain,cc(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956)|~ca(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c40, c9])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c17,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X23)|cc(X23)|ca(X23)|cc(X23),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c14])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c45,plain,cc(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956)|ca(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c17, c0])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c49,plain,cc(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c45, c43])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c50,plain,~ca(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c49, c8])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(axiom_4,axiom,(![X]:(cb(X)=>(~cc(X)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_4)).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c1,plain,(![X]:(cb(X)=>~cc(X))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_4])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c2,plain,(![X]:(~cb(X)|~cc(X))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.22/0.59 fof(c3,plain,(![X2]:(~cb(X2)|~cc(X2))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c4,plain,~cb(X12)|~cc(X12),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c51,plain,~cb(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c49, c4])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c20,plain,~cUnsatisfiable(X26)|cb(X26)|cb(X26)|ca(X26),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c14])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c54,plain,cb(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956)|ca(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c20, c0])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c56,plain,ca(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c54, c51])).
% 0.22/0.59 cnf(c58,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c56, c50])).
% 0.22/0.59 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.22/0.59
% 0.22/0.59 % Initial clauses : 19
% 0.22/0.59 % Processed clauses : 23
% 0.22/0.59 % Factors computed : 0
% 0.22/0.59 % Resolvents computed: 20
% 0.22/0.59 % Tautologies deleted: 3
% 0.22/0.59 % Forward subsumed : 7
% 0.22/0.59 % Backward subsumed : 5
% 0.22/0.59 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.22/0.59 % User time : 0.205 s
% 0.22/0.59 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.22/0.59 % Total time : 0.224 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------