TSTP Solution File: KRS067+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : KRS067+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:45:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.86s 1.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 4 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 19 ~; 18 |; 3 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 (; 14 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ xsd_string > xsd_integer > cowlThing > cowlNothing > cc > cb > ca > cUnsatisfiable > #nlpp > i2003_11_14_17_18_1956
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(cc,type,
cc: $i > $o ).
tff(cowlThing,type,
cowlThing: $i > $o ).
tff(cUnsatisfiable,type,
cUnsatisfiable: $i > $o ).
tff(xsd_integer,type,
xsd_integer: $i > $o ).
tff(ca,type,
ca: $i > $o ).
tff(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956,type,
i2003_11_14_17_18_1956: $i ).
tff(xsd_string,type,
xsd_string: $i > $o ).
tff(cb,type,
cb: $i > $o ).
tff(cowlNothing,type,
cowlNothing: $i > $o ).
tff(f_56,axiom,
! [X] :
( cUnsatisfiable(X)
<=> ( ( cc(X)
& cb(X) )
| ( cb(X)
& ca(X) )
| ( cc(X)
& ca(X) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
tff(f_70,axiom,
! [X] :
( cb(X)
=> ~ cc(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_4) ).
tff(f_64,axiom,
! [X] :
( ca(X)
=> ~ ( cc(X)
| cb(X) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_3) ).
tff(f_72,axiom,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_5) ).
tff(c_14,plain,
! [X_3] :
( cb(X_3)
| ca(X_3)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_3) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).
tff(c_64,plain,
! [X_15] :
( ca(X_15)
| cc(X_15)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_15) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).
tff(c_36,plain,
! [X_5] :
( ~ cc(X_5)
| ~ cb(X_5) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).
tff(c_79,plain,
! [X_18] :
( ~ cb(X_18)
| ca(X_18)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_18) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_36]) ).
tff(c_84,plain,
! [X_19] :
( ca(X_19)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_19) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_79]) ).
tff(c_55,plain,
! [X_14] :
( cb(X_14)
| cc(X_14)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_14) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).
tff(c_34,plain,
! [X_4] :
( ~ cc(X_4)
| ~ ca(X_4) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_64]) ).
tff(c_73,plain,
! [X_16] :
( ~ ca(X_16)
| cb(X_16)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_16) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_34]) ).
tff(c_32,plain,
! [X_4] :
( ~ cb(X_4)
| ~ ca(X_4) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_64]) ).
tff(c_77,plain,
! [X_16] :
( ~ ca(X_16)
| ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_16) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_32]) ).
tff(c_88,plain,
! [X_19] : ~ cUnsatisfiable(X_19),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_84,c_77]) ).
tff(c_38,plain,
cUnsatisfiable(i2003_11_14_17_18_1956),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_72]) ).
tff(c_90,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_38]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : KRS067+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 20:27:52 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.86/1.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.86/1.65
% 2.86/1.65 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.86/1.68
% 2.86/1.68 Inference rules
% 2.86/1.68 ----------------------
% 2.86/1.68 #Ref : 0
% 2.86/1.68 #Sup : 9
% 2.86/1.68 #Fact : 0
% 2.86/1.68 #Define : 0
% 2.86/1.68 #Split : 0
% 2.86/1.68 #Chain : 0
% 2.86/1.68 #Close : 0
% 2.86/1.68
% 2.86/1.68 Ordering : KBO
% 2.86/1.68
% 2.86/1.68 Simplification rules
% 2.86/1.68 ----------------------
% 2.86/1.68 #Subsume : 15
% 2.86/1.68 #Demod : 0
% 2.86/1.68 #Tautology : 4
% 2.86/1.68 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 2.86/1.68 #BackRed : 1
% 2.86/1.68
% 2.86/1.68 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.86/1.68 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.86/1.68
% 2.86/1.68 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.86/1.68 ----------------------
% 2.86/1.68 Preprocessing : 0.43
% 2.86/1.68 Parsing : 0.23
% 2.86/1.68 CNF conversion : 0.03
% 2.86/1.68 Main loop : 0.22
% 2.86/1.68 Inferencing : 0.10
% 2.86/1.68 Reduction : 0.04
% 2.86/1.68 Demodulation : 0.03
% 2.86/1.68 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 2.86/1.69 Subsumption : 0.05
% 2.86/1.69 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.86/1.69 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.86/1.69 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.86/1.69 Total : 0.69
% 2.86/1.69 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.86/1.69 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.86/1.69 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.86/1.69 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------