TSTP Solution File: KRS066+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : KRS066+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:45:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.32s 1.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 4 unt; 4 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 4 ~; 1 |; 1 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 4 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 6 (; 6 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ xsd_string > xsd_integer > cowlThing > cowlNothing > #nlpp
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(cowlThing,type,
cowlThing: $i > $o ).
tff(xsd_integer,type,
xsd_integer: $i > $o ).
tff(xsd_string,type,
xsd_string: $i > $o ).
tff(cowlNothing,type,
cowlNothing: $i > $o ).
tff(f_33,axiom,
! [X] :
( cowlThing(X)
& ~ cowlNothing(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_0) ).
tff(f_44,axiom,
! [X] :
( cowlThing(X)
<=> cowlNothing(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
! [X_1] : ~ cowlNothing(X_1),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
! [X_3] :
( cowlNothing(X_3)
| ~ cowlThing(X_3) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_44]) ).
tff(c_13,plain,
! [X_3] : ~ cowlThing(X_3),
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_10]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [X_1] : cowlThing(X_1),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_33]) ).
tff(c_14,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_2]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : KRS066+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.20/0.37 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.20/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 20:10:36 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 2.32/1.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.32/1.56
% 2.32/1.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.32/1.60
% 2.32/1.60 Inference rules
% 2.32/1.60 ----------------------
% 2.32/1.60 #Ref : 0
% 2.32/1.60 #Sup : 0
% 2.32/1.60 #Fact : 0
% 2.32/1.60 #Define : 0
% 2.32/1.60 #Split : 0
% 2.32/1.60 #Chain : 0
% 2.32/1.60 #Close : 0
% 2.32/1.60
% 2.32/1.60 Ordering : KBO
% 2.32/1.60
% 2.32/1.60 Simplification rules
% 2.32/1.60 ----------------------
% 2.32/1.60 #Subsume : 5
% 2.32/1.60 #Demod : 0
% 2.32/1.60 #Tautology : 0
% 2.32/1.60 #SimpNegUnit : 2
% 2.32/1.60 #BackRed : 0
% 2.32/1.60
% 2.32/1.60 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.32/1.60 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.32/1.60
% 2.32/1.60 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.32/1.60 ----------------------
% 2.32/1.61 Preprocessing : 0.40
% 2.32/1.61 Parsing : 0.23
% 2.32/1.61 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.32/1.61 Main loop : 0.05
% 2.32/1.61 Inferencing : 0.00
% 2.32/1.61 Reduction : 0.01
% 2.32/1.61 Demodulation : 0.01
% 2.32/1.61 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.32/1.61 Subsumption : 0.03
% 2.32/1.61 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.32/1.61 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.32/1.61 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.32/1.61 Total : 0.51
% 2.32/1.61 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.32/1.61 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.32/1.61 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.32/1.61 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------