TSTP Solution File: KRS064+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : KRS064+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:45:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.32s 1.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 4 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 (; 2 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ xsd_string > xsd_integer > cowlThing > cowlNothing > #nlpp > i2003_11_14_17_18_08754
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(cowlThing,type,
cowlThing: $i > $o ).
tff(xsd_integer,type,
xsd_integer: $i > $o ).
tff(xsd_string,type,
xsd_string: $i > $o ).
tff(cowlNothing,type,
cowlNothing: $i > $o ).
tff(i2003_11_14_17_18_08754,type,
i2003_11_14_17_18_08754: $i ).
tff(f_34,axiom,
! [X] :
( cowlThing(X)
& ~ cowlNothing(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_0) ).
tff(f_42,axiom,
cowlNothing(i2003_11_14_17_18_08754),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_2) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
! [X_1] : ~ cowlNothing(X_1),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
cowlNothing(i2003_11_14_17_18_08754),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).
tff(c_11,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_10]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : KRS064+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 20:38:38 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.32/1.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.32/1.55
% 2.32/1.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.32/1.59
% 2.32/1.59 Inference rules
% 2.32/1.59 ----------------------
% 2.32/1.59 #Ref : 0
% 2.32/1.59 #Sup : 0
% 2.32/1.59 #Fact : 0
% 2.32/1.59 #Define : 0
% 2.32/1.59 #Split : 0
% 2.32/1.59 #Chain : 0
% 2.32/1.59 #Close : 0
% 2.32/1.59
% 2.32/1.59 Ordering : KBO
% 2.32/1.59
% 2.32/1.59 Simplification rules
% 2.32/1.59 ----------------------
% 2.32/1.59 #Subsume : 4
% 2.32/1.59 #Demod : 0
% 2.32/1.59 #Tautology : 0
% 2.32/1.59 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 2.32/1.59 #BackRed : 0
% 2.32/1.59
% 2.32/1.59 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.32/1.59 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.32/1.59
% 2.32/1.59 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.32/1.59 ----------------------
% 2.51/1.60 Preprocessing : 0.39
% 2.51/1.60 Parsing : 0.22
% 2.51/1.60 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.51/1.60 Main loop : 0.05
% 2.51/1.60 Inferencing : 0.00
% 2.51/1.60 Reduction : 0.02
% 2.51/1.60 Demodulation : 0.02
% 2.51/1.60 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.51/1.60 Subsumption : 0.02
% 2.51/1.60 Abstraction : 0.00
% 2.51/1.60 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.51/1.60 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.51/1.60 Total : 0.50
% 2.51/1.60 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.51/1.60 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.51/1.60 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.51/1.60 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------