TSTP Solution File: KRS052+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : KRS052+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 1.50s 1.68s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : KRS052+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 09:41:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.44/1.63  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 1.44/1.63  The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 1.44/1.63  Tue Jun  7 09:41:55 2022
% 1.44/1.63  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 26092.
% 1.44/1.63  
% 1.44/1.63  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.44/1.63  set(auto).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 1.44/1.63  clear(print_given).
% 1.44/1.63  
% 1.44/1.63  formula_list(usable).
% 1.44/1.63  
% 1.44/1.63  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=22.
% 1.44/1.63  
% 1.44/1.63  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.44/1.63  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 1.44/1.63  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.44/1.63  clauses in usable.
% 1.44/1.63  
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.44/1.63     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.44/1.63  
% 1.44/1.63  ------------> process usable:
% 1.44/1.63  20 back subsumes 4.
% 1.44/1.63  96 back subsumes 41.
% 1.44/1.63  101 back subsumes 44.
% 1.44/1.63  106 back subsumes 47.
% 1.44/1.63  
% 1.44/1.63  ------------> process sos:
% 1.44/1.63  153 back subsumes 5.
% 1.44/1.63    Following clause subsumed by 155 during input processing: 0 [copy,155,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 152.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 151.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 150.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 149.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 148.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 147.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 146.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 145.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 144.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 143.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 142.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 141.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 140.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 139.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 138.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 137.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 136.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 135.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 134.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 133.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 132.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 131.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 130.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 129.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 128.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 127.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 126.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 125.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 124.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 123.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 122.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 121.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 120.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 119.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 118.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 117.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 116.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 115.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 114.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 113.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 112.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 111.
% 1.44/1.63  155 back subsumes 110.
% 1.44/1.63  
% 1.44/1.63  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.44/1.67  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.44/1.67  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.44/1.67  number of clauses in intial UL: 104
% 1.44/1.67  number of clauses initially in problem: 107
% 1.44/1.67  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 97
% 1.44/1.67  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 1.44/1.67  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.44/1.67  absolute distinct symbol count: 40
% 1.44/1.67     distinct predicate count: 14
% 1.44/1.67     distinct function count: 26
% 1.44/1.67     distinct constant count: 0
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.44/1.67  
% 1.44/1.67  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  ============ end of search ============
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  true clauses given           1      (33.3%)
% 1.44/1.68  false clauses given          2
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.44/1.68  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.44/1.68  
% 1.44/1.68  Process 26092 finished Tue Jun  7 09:41:56 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------