TSTP Solution File: KRS013-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : KRS013-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 22:49:04 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8345/KRS/KRS013-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21] [nf = 0] [nu = 7] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 92] [nf = 0] [nu = 20] [ut = 8]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 428] [nf = 10] [nu = 53] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1530] [nf = 30] [nu = 164] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4454] [nf = 80] [nu = 517] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11528] [nf = 162] [nu = 1492] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31915] [nf = 518] [nu = 4443] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 89098] [nf = 1952] [nu = 14930] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 252374] [nf = 5806] [nu = 47473] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 747449] [nf = 16618] [nu = 144918] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2345449] [nf = 61460] [nu = 473067] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 19 secs [nr = 7224303] [nf = 205874] [nu = 1573810] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 59 secs [nr = 22480118] [nf = 607718] [nu = 4969539] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 47045755] [nf = 1282670] [nu = 10268394] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 47045828] [nf = 1282670] [nu = 10268409] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 47046164] [nf = 1282680] [nu = 10268442] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 47047266] [nf = 1282700] [nu = 10268553] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 47050190] [nf = 1282750] [nu = 10268906] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 47057264] [nf = 1282832] [nu = 10269881] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 47077651] [nf = 1283188] [nu = 10272832] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 47134834] [nf = 1284622] [nu = 10283319] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 47298110] [nf = 1288476] [nu = 10315862] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 47793185] [nf = 1299288] [nu = 10413307] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 49391185] [nf = 1344130] [nu = 10741456] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 141 secs [nr = 54270039] [nf = 1488544] [nu = 11842199] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 181 secs [nr = 69525854] [nf = 1890388] [nu = 15237928] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 120172817
% resolvents: 116940609 factors: 3232208
% Number of unit clauses generated: 25717886
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 21.40
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2 [1] = 5 [2] = 1 [3] = 1
% Total = 9
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 25717886 [2] = 53838083 [3] = 40616848
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] d_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] e_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] f_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] s1most_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] s2least_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] t1most_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [7] t2least_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [9] r_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [10] s_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [11] t_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)6 (-)3
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 9
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 169791385
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 37267109
% Number of successful unifications: 120172817
% Number of unification failures: 16500383
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 334010261
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1433470331
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 17659581
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 6
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 3
% Number of states in UCFA table: 27
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 27
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.00
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 58
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 136673200
% ConstructUnitClause() = 17659588
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 20.35 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 400576
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------