TSTP Solution File: KRS010-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : KRS010-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:29:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 30.22s 30.42s
% Output   : Refutation 30.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : KRS010-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 07:16:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Tue Jun  7 07:16:05 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 27640.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.43  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.43  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.43  number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.19/0.43  number of clauses initially in problem: 34
% 0.19/0.43  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 97
% 0.19/0.43  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.43  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.43  absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.19/0.43     distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.19/0.43     distinct function count: 8
% 0.19/0.43     distinct constant count: 1
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  
% 0.19/0.43  =========== start of search ===========
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Model 2 [ 1 1 191 ] (0.00 seconds, 66869 Inserts)
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Model 3 [ 1 0 502 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Model 4 [ 1 5 147922 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Model 5 [ 2 1 197 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Model 6 [ 2 0 509 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at  30.03 sec ----> 3672 [hyper,3232,20,35] {-} $F.
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Length of proof is 27.  Level of proof is 12.
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 30.22/30.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 30.22/30.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  1 [] {+} -f(exist).
% 30.22/30.42  2 [] {+} c(A)|d(A)| -a(A).
% 30.22/30.42  5 [] {+} equalish(A,B)| -e(C)| -r(C,A)| -r(C,B)| -c(A)| -c(B).
% 30.22/30.42  6 [] {+} r3least(A)| -e(A).
% 30.22/30.42  7 [] {+} a(A)| -e(B)| -r(B,A).
% 30.22/30.42  18 [] {+} -r3least(A)| -equalish(u2r2(A),u2r1(A)).
% 30.22/30.42  19 [] {+} -r3least(A)| -equalish(u2r3(A),u2r1(A)).
% 30.22/30.42  20 [] {+} -r3least(A)| -equalish(u2r3(A),u2r2(A)).
% 30.22/30.42  21 [] {+} r(A,u2r1(A))| -r3least(A).
% 30.22/30.42  22 [] {+} r(A,u2r2(A))| -r3least(A).
% 30.22/30.42  23 [] {+} r(A,u2r3(A))| -r3least(A).
% 30.22/30.42  30 [] {+} f(A)|equalish(B,C)| -r(A,B)| -r(A,C)| -d(B)| -d(C).
% 30.22/30.42  31 [factor,5.3.4,factor_simp] {+} equalish(A,A)| -e(B)| -r(B,A)| -c(A).
% 30.22/30.42  33 [factor,30.3.4,factor_simp] {+} f(A)|equalish(B,B)| -r(A,B)| -d(B).
% 30.22/30.42  34 [] {-} e(exist).
% 30.22/30.42  35 [hyper,34,6] {+} r3least(exist).
% 30.22/30.42  41 [hyper,35,23] {+} r(exist,u2r3(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  42 [hyper,35,22] {+} r(exist,u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  43 [hyper,35,21] {+} r(exist,u2r1(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  52 [hyper,41,7,34] {+} a(u2r3(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  68 [hyper,52,2] {+} c(u2r3(exist))|d(u2r3(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  77 [hyper,42,7,34] {+} a(u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  106 [hyper,77,2] {+} c(u2r2(exist))|d(u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  115 [hyper,43,7,34] {+} a(u2r1(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  131 [hyper,115,2] {+} c(u2r1(exist))|d(u2r1(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  286 [hyper,106,33,42,unit_del,1] {+} c(u2r2(exist))|equalish(u2r2(exist),u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  287 [hyper,106,30,41,42,68,unit_del,1] {+} c(u2r2(exist))|equalish(u2r3(exist),u2r2(exist))|c(u2r3(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  308 [hyper,131,33,43,unit_del,1] {+} c(u2r1(exist))|equalish(u2r1(exist),u2r1(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  309 [hyper,131,30,42,43,106,unit_del,1] {+} c(u2r1(exist))|equalish(u2r2(exist),u2r1(exist))|c(u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  310 [hyper,131,30,41,43,68,unit_del,1] {+} c(u2r1(exist))|equalish(u2r3(exist),u2r1(exist))|c(u2r3(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  388 [hyper,286,31,34,42,factor_simp] {+} equalish(u2r2(exist),u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  389 [hyper,308,31,34,43,factor_simp] {+} equalish(u2r1(exist),u2r1(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  561 [para_from,287.2.1,20.2.1,unit_del,35,388] {+} c(u2r2(exist))|c(u2r3(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  662 [para_from,309.2.1,18.2.1,unit_del,35,389] {+} c(u2r1(exist))|c(u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  663 [hyper,662,5,34,41,43,561,factor_simp] {+} c(u2r2(exist))|equalish(u2r3(exist),u2r1(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  758 [para_from,663.2.1,19.2.1,unit_del,35,389] {+} c(u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  835 [para_from,310.2.1,19.2.1,unit_del,35,389] {+} c(u2r1(exist))|c(u2r3(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  1154 [hyper,835,5,34,42,43,758] {+} c(u2r3(exist))|equalish(u2r2(exist),u2r1(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  1633 [para_from,1154.2.1,18.2.1,unit_del,35,389] {+} c(u2r3(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  3232 [hyper,1633,5,34,42,41,758,flip.1] {+} equalish(u2r3(exist),u2r2(exist)).
% 30.22/30.42  3672 [hyper,3232,20,35] {-} $F.
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  % SZS output end Refutation
% 30.22/30.42  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  ============ end of search ============
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  true clauses given          30      (61.2%)
% 30.22/30.42  false clauses given         19
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42        FALSE     TRUE
% 30.22/30.42     8  0         1
% 30.22/30.42    10  0         1
% 30.22/30.42    14  0         1
% 30.22/30.42    15  0         8
% 30.22/30.42    16  0         17
% 30.22/30.42    17  0         23
% 30.22/30.42    18  0         41
% 30.22/30.42    19  1         40
% 30.22/30.42    20  26        83
% 30.22/30.42    21  9         85
% 30.22/30.42    22  2         96
% 30.22/30.42    23  5         110
% 30.22/30.42    24  10        79
% 30.22/30.42    25  8         100
% 30.22/30.42    26  4         134
% 30.22/30.42    27  1         198
% 30.22/30.42    28  2         311
% 30.22/30.42    29  19        197
% 30.22/30.42    30  60        271
% 30.22/30.42    31  29        260
% 30.22/30.42    32  58        113
% 30.22/30.42    33  50        283
% 30.22/30.42    34  26        111
% 30.22/30.42    35  63        76
% 30.22/30.42    36  13        81
% 30.22/30.42    37  6         31
% 30.22/30.42    38  0         6
% 30.22/30.42  tot:  392       2757      (87.6% true)
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Model 6 [ 2 0 509 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 30.22/30.42  
% 30.22/30.42  Process 27640 finished Tue Jun  7 07:16:35 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------